Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

British Journal of Cancer
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. british journal of cancer
  3. regular article
  4. article
Radiation risk and mammographic screening of women from 40 to 49 years of age: effect on breast cancer rates and years of life
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Regular Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 10 December 1999

Radiation risk and mammographic screening of women from 40 to 49 years of age: effect on breast cancer rates and years of life

  • A Mattsson1,
  • W Leitz2 &
  • L E Rutqvist1 

British Journal of Cancer volume 82, pages 220–226 (2000)Cite this article

  • 883 Accesses

  • 21 Citations

  • 8 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

This article has been updated

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the carcinogenic risks associated with radiation in mass mammographic screening. Assessment was in terms of breast cancer mortality and years of life for a hypothetical cohort of 100 000 women. Data were obtained on incidence, mortality and life expectancy for the female population of Stockholm. With a screening interval of 18 months at ages 40–49 years, a total absorbed dose to the breast of 13 mGy per invited woman; and an annual breast cancer reduction of 25% per year 7 years from screening start, the net number of years gained was at least 2800. However, using the highest absorbed dose reported in routine mammographic screening in Sweden (≈3 mGy per view), and the highest reported radiation risk in the literature, a programme entailing annual screening with 2 views would require at least a 20% annual reduction in breast cancer mortality to give a net benefit in both the number of years of life gained and number of breast cancer deaths avoided. This observation supports the conclusion that exposures with low absorbed dose are essential when performing mass screening with mammography among young women. © 2000 Cancer Research Campaign

Similar content being viewed by others

Radiological features of screening-detected and interval breast cancers and subsequent survival in Eastern Finnish women

Article Open access 01 May 2024

A case-control study to evaluate the impact of the breast screening programme on mortality in England

Article Open access 23 November 2020

Breast cancer screening patterns and associated factors in Iranian women over 40 years

Article Open access 03 July 2024

Article PDF

Change history

  • 16 November 2011

    This paper was modified 12 months after initial publication to switch to Creative Commons licence terms, as noted at publication

References

  • Andersson I and Janzon L (1997) Reduced breast cancer mortality in women under age 50: updated results from the Malmo Mammographic Screening Program. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 22: 63–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berrino F, Sant M, Verdecchia A, Capocaccio R, Hakulinen T and Estève J (1995) Survival of Cancer Patients in Europe. IARC: Scientific Publications 132, IARC: Lyon

    Google Scholar 

  • Bjurstam N, Bjorneld L, Duffy SW, Smith TC, Cahlin E, Eriksson O, Hafstrom LO, Lingaas H, Mattsson J, Persson S, Rudenstam CM and Save-Soderbergh J (1997) The Gothenburg breast screening trial: first results on mortality, incidence, and mode of detection for women ages 39–49 years at randomization. Cancer 80: 2091–2094

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boice JD, Jr, Preston D, Davis FG and Monson RR (1991) Frequent chest X-ray fluoroscopy and breast cancer incidence among tuberculosis patients in Massachusetts. Radiat Res 125: 214–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher SW, Black W, Harris R, Rimer BK and Shapiro S (1993) Report of the International Workshop on Screening for Breast Cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 85: 1644–1656

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gordis L, Berry DA, Chu SY, Fajardo LL, Hoel DG and Laufman LR (1997) National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement: breast cancer screening for women ages 40–49, January 21–23, 1997. J Natl Cancer Inst 89: 1015–1026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IARC (1992). Cancer Incidence in Five Continents VI: International Agency for Research on Cancer: Lyon

  • Land CE (1980) Estimating cancer risks from low doses of ionizing radiation. Science 209: 1197–1203

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mattsson A, Ruden BI, Palmgren J and Rutqvist LE (1995) Dose- and time-response for breast cancer risk after radiation therapy for benign breast disease. Br J Cancer 72: 1054–1061

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • NIH (1985) Report of the National Institutes of Health ad hoc Working Group to Develop Radioepidemiological Tables. NIH Publication No. 85-2748, Office of the Director, National Institutes of Health: Washington, DC

  • Nystrom L, Rutqvist LE, Wall S, Lindgren A, Lindqvist M, Ryden S, Andersson I, Bjurstam N, Fagerberg G and Frisell J (1993) Breast cancer screening with mammography: overview of Swedish randomised trials. Lancet 341: 973–978

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rimer BK (1996) Breast cancer screening. In: Diseases of the Breast, Harris JR, Lippman ME, Morrow M, Hellman S (eds) pp. 307–322. Lippincott-Raven: Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro S, Venet W, Strax P and Venet L (1988) Current results of the breast cancer screening randomized trial: the Health Insurance Plan (HIP) of Greater New York Study. In: Screening for Breast Cancer, Day N, Miller A (eds) pp. 3–15. Hans Huber: Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  • Shore RE, Hildreth N, Woodard E, Dvoretsky P, Hempelmann L and Pasternack B (1986) Breast cancer among women given X-ray therapy for acute postpartum mastitis. J Natl Cancer Inst 77: 689–696

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stockholm Breast Cancer Study Group (1997). Breast Cancer: Diagnosis, Treatment and Follow-up in the Stockholm-Gotland Region, Onkologic Centre, Karolinska Hospital: Stockholm (in Swedish)

  • Tabar L, Larsson L-G, Andersson I, Duffy SW, Nyström L and Rutqvist LE (1996) Breast-cancer screening with mammography in women aged 40–49 years. International Journal of Cancer 68: 663–699

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tokunaga M, Land CE, Tokuoka S, Nishimori I, Soda M and Akiba S (1994) Incidence of female breast cancer among atomic bomb survivors, 1950–1985. Radiat Res 138: 209–223

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • UNSCEAR (1988) United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation. Sources, Effects and Risks of Ionizing Radiation. 1988 Report to the General Assembly, with scientific annexes, United Nations: New York

  • UNSCEAR (1993) United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation. Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation. UNSCEAR 1993 Report to the General Assembly, with scientific annexes, United Nations: New York

  • UNSCEAR (1994) United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation. Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation. UNSCEAR 1994 Report to the General Assembly, with scientific annexes, United Nations: New York

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Oncologic Centre M8:01, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, S-171 76, Sweden

    A Mattsson & L E Rutqvist

  2. Swedish Radiation Protection Institute, Stockholm, S-171 16, Sweden

    W Leitz

Authors
  1. A Mattsson
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. W Leitz
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. L E Rutqvist
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

From twelve months after its original publication, this work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mattsson, A., Leitz, W. & Rutqvist, L. Radiation risk and mammographic screening of women from 40 to 49 years of age: effect on breast cancer rates and years of life. Br J Cancer 82, 220–226 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1054/bjoc.1999.0903

Download citation

  • Received: 05 January 1999

  • Revised: 09 June 1999

  • Published: 10 December 1999

  • Issue date: 01 January 2000

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1054/bjoc.1999.0903

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • mammographic screening
  • radiation risk
  • life years

This article is cited by

  • Doubtful health benefit of screening from 40 years of age

    • Philippe Autier

    Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology (2015)

  • Population-based mammography screening below age 50: balancing radiation-induced vs prevented breast cancer deaths

    • R de Gelder
    • G Draisma
    • H J de Koning

    British Journal of Cancer (2011)

  • Mammographic screening before age 50 years in the UK: comparison of the radiation risks with the mortality benefits

    • A Berrington de González
    • G Reeves

    British Journal of Cancer (2005)

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Current issue
  • Collections
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Journal Information
  • Open access publishing
  • About the Editors
  • Contact
  • Special Issues
  • For Advertisers
  • Subscribe

Publish with us

  • For Authors & Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

British Journal of Cancer (Br J Cancer)

ISSN 1532-1827 (online)

ISSN 0007-0920 (print)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2025 Springer Nature Limited