Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

British Journal of Cancer
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. british journal of cancer
  3. regular article
  4. article
A unified definition of clinical anthracycline resistance breast cancer
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Regular Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 07 January 2000

A unified definition of clinical anthracycline resistance breast cancer

  • X Pivot1,
  • L Asmar2,
  • A U Buzdar2,
  • V Valero2 &
  • …
  • G Hortobagyi2 

British Journal of Cancer volume 82, pages 529–534 (2000)Cite this article

  • 1063 Accesses

  • 38 Citations

  • 3 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

This article has been updated

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to determine the response rates (RR) and duration to second- and third-line chemotherapy programmes in patients with anthracycline-resistant breast cancer, utilizing various definitions of anthracycline resistance. This was a retrospective analysis performed on 1335 patients with metastatic breast cancer who participated in consecutive clinical trials of first line, anthracycline-containing combination chemotherapy (ACCC) at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center between July 1973 and April 1980. Anthracycline-resistant groups were identified using definitions of anthracycline resistance found in the literature: progressive disease as best response to ACCC (Group 1, n = 56 patients); progressive disease while receiving ACCC after an intervening response to the drug (Group 2, n = 84); progressive disease within 6 months of last dose of ACCC (Group 3, n = 233); and progressive disease within 12 months of last dose of ACCC (Group 4, n = 272). Second- and third-line therapies administered to these patients included methotrexate, doxorubicin, mitoxantrone, bisantrene, vinblastine, vindesine, melphalan, mitomycin, cisplatin, etoposide and others, but not taxanes. The distribution of patients' characteristics was similar between the four groups, as was the use of second- and third-line regimens. Response rate (RR) to second-line chemotherapy were 5% and 7.7% for Group 1 and Group 2 respectively. In contrast, RR to second-line chemotherapy were 21.6% and 15% for Group 3 and 4. The differences in response rate between the combination of Groups 1 and 2 and Groups 3 or 4 were significant (P = 0.005 and P = 0.04 respectively). These results indicate that strictly defined anthracycline resistance as defined in Groups 1 and 2 is associated with resistance to many other cytotoxic drugs. The definitions used in Groups 3 and 4 include many patients with responsive tumours, and a more favourable prognosis. © 2000 Cancer Research Campaign

Similar content being viewed by others

Anthracycline-containing regimens or taxane versus S-1 as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer

Article 03 September 2021

The impact of anthracyclines in intermediate and high-risk HER2-negative early breast cancer—a pooled analysis of the randomised clinical trials PlanB and SUCCESS C

Article Open access 22 February 2022

A careful reassessment of anthracycline use in curable breast cancer

Article Open access 08 October 2021

Article PDF

Change history

  • 16 November 2011

    This paper was modified 12 months after initial publication to switch to Creative Commons licence terms, as noted at publication

References

  • Creech R, Catalano R, Shah M and Dayal H (1993) An effective low-dose mitomycin regimen for hormonal- and chemotherapy-refractory patients with metastatic breast cancer. Cancer 51: 1034–1040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Degardin M, Bonneterre J, Hecquet B, Pion JM, Adenis A, Horner D and Demaille A (1994) Vinorelbine (Navelbine) as a salvage treatment for advanced breast cancer. Ann Oncol 5: 423–426

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • De Vita V (1993) Biochemical resistance to chemotherapy is the major impediment to successful treatment. In: Cancer: Principles and Practice of Oncology, De Vita V, Hellman S, Rosenberg S (eds), pp. 281–283. Lippincott: Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson C (1991) Chemotherapy for metastatic disease. In: Breast Disease, Harris J, Hellman S, Henderson C, Kinne D (eds), pp. 604–665. Lippincott: Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes A, Valero V, Walters R, Theriault R, Booser D, Fraschini G, Buzdar A, Frye D, Gibbs H and Hortobagyi G (1993) The MD Anderson Cancer Center experience with Taxol in metastatic breast cancer. Cancer 15: 161–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Hortobagyi G (1995 a) Management of breast cancer: status and future trends. Semin Oncol 22: 101–107

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hortobagyi G (1995 b) Future directions for vinorelbine (Navelbine). [Review]. Semin Oncol 22: suppl 2: 80–86

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hortobagyi G and Buzdar A (1991) Locally advanced breast cancer: a review including the MD Anderson experience. In: High-risk Breast Cancer, Ragaz J, Ariel I (eds pp. 382–415. Springer-Verlag: Berlin

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hortobagyi G and Buzdar A (1993) Present status of anthracyclines in adjuvant treatment of breast cancer [Review]. Drugs 45, suppl 2: 10–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hortobagyi G and Buzdar A (1995) Current status of adjuvant systemic therapy for primary breast cancer: progress and controversy. CA Cancer 45: 199–226

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hortobagyi G, Smith T, Legha S, Swenerton K, Gehan E, Yap H, Buzdar A and Blumenschein G (1983) Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors in metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 12: 776–786

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones S, Winner E, Vogel C, Laufman L, Hutchins L, O'Rourke M, Lembersky B, Budman D, Bigley J and Hohneker J (1995) Randomized comparison of vinorelbine and melphalan in anthracycline-refractory advanced breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 13: 2567–2574

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan E and Meier P (1958) Non-parametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc 53: 457–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mantel N (1966) Evaluation of survival data and two new rank order statistics arising in its consideration. Cancer Chemother Rep 50: 163–170

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Munzone E, Capri G, Fulfaro F, Tarenzi E, Caraceni A, Villani F, Spreafico C, Laffranchi A, Crabeels D and Gianni L (1994) Paclitaxel by 3 H schedule in relapsed breast cancer resistant to anthracycline. Ann Oncol 5: 43 (abstract 212)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nabholtz J, Gelmon K, Bontenal M, Spielmann M, Clavel M, Seeber S, Conte P, Boneterre J, Fumoleua P, Slukes A, Sauter C, Roche H, Calvert H, Kaufman J, Chazard M, Diergarten K, Gallant G, Thompson M, Winograd B and Onetto N Bristol-Myers Squibb Taxol Study Group (1993) Randomized trial of two doses of taxol in metastatic breast cancer: an interim analysis. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 12: 60 (abstract 42)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pivot X, Asmar L and Hortobagyi G (1999) The efficacy of chemotherapy with docetaxel and paclitaxel in anthracycline-resistant breast cancer. Int J Oncol 15: 381–386

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Radvin P, Burris H, Cook G, Eisenberg P, Kane M, Bierman W, Mortimer J, Genevois E and Gellet R (1995) Phase II trial of docetaxel in advanced anthracycline-resistant or anthracenedione-resistant breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 13: 2879–2885

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seidman A, Norton L, Reichman B, Crown J, Yao T, Heelan R, Hakes T, Lebwohl D, Gilewski T and Surbone A (1993) Preliminary experience with paclitaxel plus recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in the treatment of breast cancer. Semin Oncol 20: 40–45

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Valero V, Holmes F, Waters R, Theriault R, Esparza L, Fraschini G, Fonseca G, Bellet R, Buzdar A and Hortobagyi G (1995) Phase II trial of docetaxel: a new, highly effective antineoplasic agent in the management of patients with anthracycline-resistant metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 13: 2886–2894

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vermoken JB, Ten Bokkel Huinink W, Mandjes I, Postman T, Huizing T, Heimans J, Beijnen J, Bierhorst F, Winograd B and Pinedo H (1995) High dose paclitaxel with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in patients with advanced breast carcinoma refractory to anthracycline therapy: a European Cancer Center trial. Semin Oncol 22: 16–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters R, Frye D, Buzdar A, Holmes F and Hortobagyi G (1992) A randomized trial of two dosage schedules of mitomycin C in advanced breast carcinoma. Cancer 69: 476–481

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson W, Berg S, Bryant G, Wittes R, Bates S, Fojo A, Steinberg S, Goldspiel B, Herdt J, O'Shaughnessy J, Balis F and Chabner B (1994) Paclitaxel in doxorubicin-refractory or mitaxantrone refractory breast cancer: a phase I/II trial of 96-hour infusion. J Clin Oncol 12: 1621–1629

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yau J, Yap Y, Buzdar A, Hortobagyi G, Bodey G and Blumenschein G (1985) A comparative randomized trial of vinca-alcaloïds in patients with metastatic breast carcinoma. Cancer 55: 337–340

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre Antoine Lacassagne, 33 avenue de Vallombrose, Nice, cedex 2, 06189, France

    X Pivot

  2. Department of Breast Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA

    L Asmar, A U Buzdar, V Valero & G Hortobagyi

Authors
  1. X Pivot
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. L Asmar
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. A U Buzdar
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. V Valero
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. G Hortobagyi
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

From twelve months after its original publication, this work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pivot, X., Asmar, L., Buzdar, A. et al. A unified definition of clinical anthracycline resistance breast cancer. Br J Cancer 82, 529–534 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1054/bjoc.1999.0958

Download citation

  • Received: 11 May 1999

  • Revised: 01 September 1999

  • Accepted: 14 September 1999

  • Published: 07 January 2000

  • Issue date: 01 February 2000

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1054/bjoc.1999.0958

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • anthracycline resistance
  • breast cancer
  • clinical definition

This article is cited by

  • CTCs-oriented adjuvant personalized cytostatic therapy non-metastatic breast cancer patients: continuous non-randomized prospective study and prospective randomized controlled study

    • Ya A. Shliakhtunou

    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment (2021)

  • Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer: 8-year experience of a single center

    • Salah Mabrouk Khallaf
    • Jasmine Roshdy
    • Abeer Ibrahim

    Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute (2020)

  • Chemotherapy in Patients with Anthracycline and Taxane-Pretreated Metastatic Breast Cancer: An Overview

    • Eleni Andreopoulou
    • Joseph A. Sparano

    Current Breast Cancer Reports (2013)

  • New Microtubule Inhibitors in Breast Cancer

    • Cristian B. Villanueva
    • Fernando F. Bazan
    • Xavier B. Pivot

    Current Breast Cancer Reports (2013)

  • A multicenter phase II trial of docetaxel plus gemcitabine as salvage treatment in anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer

    • N. Karachaliou
    • Ch. Kouroussis
    • D. Mavroudis

    Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology (2012)

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Current issue
  • Collections
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Journal Information
  • Open access publishing
  • About the Editors
  • Contact
  • Special Issues
  • For Advertisers
  • Subscribe

Publish with us

  • For Authors & Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

British Journal of Cancer (Br J Cancer)

ISSN 1532-1827 (online)

ISSN 0007-0920 (print)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2025 Springer Nature Limited