Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

British Journal of Cancer
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. british journal of cancer
  3. regular article
  4. article
Persistent gestational trophoblastic disease: results of MEA (methotrexate, etoposide and dactinomycin) as first-line chemotherapy in high risk disease and EA (etoposide and dactinomycin) as second-line therapy for low risk disease
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Regular Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 04 April 2000

Persistent gestational trophoblastic disease: results of MEA (methotrexate, etoposide and dactinomycin) as first-line chemotherapy in high risk disease and EA (etoposide and dactinomycin) as second-line therapy for low risk disease

  • L S Dobson1,
  • P C Lorigan1,
  • R E Coleman1 &
  • …
  • B W Hancock1 

British Journal of Cancer volume 82, pages 1547–1552 (2000)Cite this article

  • 2222 Accesses

  • 43 Citations

  • 6 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

This article has been updated

Abstract

Persistent gestational trophoblastic disease is potentially fatal, but the majority of patients are cured with chemotherapy. Any developments in treatment are therefore being directed towards maintaining efficacy and reducing toxicity. We evaluated efficacy and toxicity of methotrexate, etoposide and dactinomycin (MEA) as first-line therapy for high risk disease and etoposide and dactinomycin (EA) as second-line therapy for methotrexate-refractory low risk disease in a retrospective analysis of 73 patients (38 MEA, 35 EA) treated since 1986 at a supra-regional centre. The median follow-up period was 5.5 years and the median number of cycles received was 7. The overall complete response rate was 85% (97% for EA, 75% for MEA). Of eight patients who failed to respond, four have since died and four were cured with platinum-based chemotherapy. Alopecia was universal. Grade II or worse nausea, emesis, or stomatitis was observed in 29%, 30% and 37% respectively. Fifty-one per cent experienced grade II/III anaemia, 8% grade II or higher thrombocytopenia and 64% grade III or IV neutropenia; in six cases this was complicated by sepsis. Fifty-four per cent of patients went on to have a normal pregnancy. No patient has developed a second malignancy. In conclusion, the MEA and EA chemotherapy regimens for persistent trophoblastic disease are very well tolerated, do not appear to affect future fertility and are associated with excellent, sustained complete response rates. © 2000 Cancer Research Campaign

Similar content being viewed by others

Global disparities in drug-related adverse events of patients with multiple myeloma: a pharmacovigilance study

Article Open access 20 December 2024

Efficacies of FAEV and EMA/CO regimens as primary treatment for gestational trophoblastic neoplasia

Article 22 April 2022

Single-agent belantamab mafodotin for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: analysis of the lyophilised presentation cohort from the pivotal DREAMM-2 study

Article Open access 23 October 2020

Article PDF

Change history

  • 16 November 2011

    This paper was modified 12 months after initial publication to switch to Creative Commons licence terms, as noted at publication

References

  • Ayhan A, Yapar EG and Deren O et al (1992) Remission rates and significance of prognostic factors in gestational trophoblastic tumours. J Reprod Med 37: 461–465

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bagshawe KD (1976) Risk and prognostic factors in trophoblastic neoplasia. Cancer 38: 1373–1385

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bagshawe KD, Dent J and Newlands ES et al (1989) The role of low-dose methotrexate and folinic acid in gestational trophoblastic tumours. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 96: 795–802

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berkowitz RS and Goldstein DP (1997) Presentation and management of persistent gestational trophoblastic disease and gestational trophoblastic tumours in the USA. In: Gestational Trophoblastic Disease, 1st edn, Hancock BW, Newlands ES, Berkowitz RS (eds), pp 159–172, Chapman and Hall: London

    Google Scholar 

  • Bower M, Newlands ES and Holden L et al (1997) EMA/CO for high-risk gestational trophoblastic tumours: results from a cohort of 272 patients. J Clin Oncol 15: 2636–2643

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Doreen MS (1993) Gestational trophoblastic diseases: a review of their presentation and management. Clin Oncol 5: 46–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DuBreschter B, Berkowitz RS and Goldstein DP et al (1987) Metastatic gestational trophoblastic disease: experience at the New England Trophoblastic Disease Centre, 1965–1985. Obstet Gynaecol 69: 390–395

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubuc-Lissor J, Sweizig S and Schlaerth JB et al (1989) Metastatic gestational trophoblastic disease: a comparison of prognostic classification systems. Gynaecol Oncol 45: 40–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FIGO Oncology Committee Report (1992) Int J Gynaecol 39: 149–150

  • Gillespie AM, Siddiqui N, Coleman RE and Hancock BW (1999) Gestational trophoblastic disease: does central nervous system chemoprophylaxis have a role? Br J Cancer 79: 1270–1272

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein DP and Berkowitz RS (1995) Prophylactic chemotherapy of complete molar pregnancy. Semin Oncol 22: 157–160

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hammond CB, Borchert LG and Tyrey L et al (1973) Treatment of metastatic disease: good and poor prognosis. Am J Obstet Gynaecol 115: 451–457

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hancock BW (1997) Difference in management and treatment: a critical appraisal. In: Gestational Trophoblastic Disease, 1st edn, Hancock BW, Newlands ES, Berkowitz RS (eds), pp 213–216, Chapman and Hall: London

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy AW (1995) Persistent non-metastatic gestational trophoblastic disease. Semin Oncol 22: 161–165

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lurain JR (1994) High-risk metastatic gestational trophoblastic tumours: current management. J Reprod Med 39: 217–222

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Newlands ES (1997) Presentation and management of persistent gestational trophoblastic disease and gestational trophoblastic tumours in the UK. In: Gestational Trophoblastic Disease, 1st edn., Hancock BW, Newlands ES, Berkowitz RS (eds), pp 143–156, Chapman and Hall: London

    Google Scholar 

  • Newlands ES, Bagshawe KD and Begent RHJ et al (1986) Developments in chemotherapy for medium and high risk patients with gestational trophoblastic tumours, 1979–84. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 93: 63–69

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Newlands ES, Bagshawe KD and Begent RHJ et al (1991) Results with the EMA/CO (etoposide, methotrexate, actinomycin D, cyclophosphamide, vincristine) regimen in high risk gestational trophoblastic tumours, 1979–1989. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 98: 550–557

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn M, Murray J and Friedlander M et al (1994) EMACO in high-risk gestational trophoblastic disease; the Australian experience. Aust NZ J Obstet Gynaecol 34: 90–92

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sheridan E, Hancock BW and Smith SC et al (1993) Gestational trophoblastic disease: experience of the Sheffield (United Kingdom) supra regional screening and treatment service. Int J Oncol 3: 149–155

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Soper JT, Clarke-Pearson DL and Berchuck A et al (1994a) 5-day methotrexate for women with metastatic gestational trophoblastic disease. Gynaecol Oncol 54: 76–79

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Soper JT, Evans AC and Clarke-Pearson DL et al (1994b) Alternating weekly chemotherapy with etoposide-methotrexate-dactinomycin/cyclophosphamide-vincristine for high risk gestational trophoblastic disease. Obstet Gynaecol 83: 113–117

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Welsh E, Gillespie AM and Hancock BW (1999) Assessing and staging trophoblastic tumours – a comparison of the various systems. Br J Cancer 80: 110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WHO World Health Organization Geneva (1987) Trophoblastic diseases. WHO Tech Rep Ser 692

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Gestational Trophoblastic Disease Centre, Weston Park Hospital, Sheffield, UK

    L S Dobson, P C Lorigan, R E Coleman & B W Hancock

Authors
  1. L S Dobson
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. P C Lorigan
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. R E Coleman
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. B W Hancock
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

From twelve months after its original publication, this work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dobson, L., Lorigan, P., Coleman, R. et al. Persistent gestational trophoblastic disease: results of MEA (methotrexate, etoposide and dactinomycin) as first-line chemotherapy in high risk disease and EA (etoposide and dactinomycin) as second-line therapy for low risk disease. Br J Cancer 82, 1547–1552 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1054/bjoc.2000.1176

Download citation

  • Received: 20 September 1999

  • Revised: 14 January 2000

  • Accepted: 25 January 2000

  • Published: 04 April 2000

  • Issue date: 03 April 2000

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1054/bjoc.2000.1176

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • gestational trophoblastic disease
  • combination chemotherapy

This article is cited by

  • The efficacy and toxicity of 4-day chemotherapy with methotrexate, etoposide and actinomycin D in patients with choriocarcinoma and high-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia

    • Shizuka Sato
    • Eiko Yamamoto
    • Fumitaka Kikkawa

    International Journal of Clinical Oncology (2020)

  • External validation of serum hCG cutoff levels for prediction of resistance to single-agent chemotherapy in patients with persistent trophoblastic disease

    • L G Kerkmeijer
    • C M Thomas
    • M J Seckl

    British Journal of Cancer (2009)

  • A comparison of patients with relapsed and chemo-refractory gestational trophoblastic neoplasia

    • T Powles
    • P M Savage
    • M J Seckl

    British Journal of Cancer (2007)

  • Gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: The management of relapsing patients and other recent advances

    • Naveed Sarwar
    • Edward S. Newlands
    • Michael J. Seckl

    Current Oncology Reports (2004)

  • Low-risk persistent gestational trophoblastic disease treated with low-dose methotrexate: efficacy, acute and long-term effects

    • F Khan
    • J Everard
    • B W Hancock

    British Journal of Cancer (2003)

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Current issue
  • Collections
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Journal Information
  • Open access publishing
  • About the Editors
  • Contact
  • Special Issues
  • For Advertisers
  • Subscribe

Publish with us

  • For Authors & Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

British Journal of Cancer (Br J Cancer)

ISSN 1532-1827 (online)

ISSN 0007-0920 (print)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2025 Springer Nature Limited