Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

British Journal of Cancer
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. british journal of cancer
  3. regular article
  4. article
Dose-dense epirubicin and paclitaxel with G-CSF: a study of decreasing intervals in metastatic breast cancer
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Regular Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 23 May 2000

Dose-dense epirubicin and paclitaxel with G-CSF: a study of decreasing intervals in metastatic breast cancer

  • R I Lalisang1,
  • E E Voest2,
  • J A Wils3,
  • J W Nortier4,
  • F L Erdkamp5,
  • H F Hillen1,
  • J Wals6,
  • H C Schouten1 &
  • …
  • G H Blijham2 

British Journal of Cancer volume 82, pages 1914–1919 (2000)Cite this article

  • 736 Accesses

  • 14 Citations

  • Metrics details

This article has been updated

Abstract

Anthracyclines and taxanes are very effective drugs in the treatment of advanced breast cancer. With G-CSF support, the dose-intensity of this combination can be increased by reducing the interval between chemotherapy cycles, the so-called ‘shortening of cycle time’. We treated 36 patients with advanced breast cancer in a multicentre phase I/II study. The treatment regimen consisted of epirubicin 75 mg m–2 followed by paclitaxel 135 mg m–2 (3 h) in combination with G-CSF. At least six patients were treated in each cohort and were evaluated over the first three cycles. Starting at an interval of 14 days, in subsequent cohorts of patients the interval could be shortened to 10 days. An 8-day interval was not feasible due mainly to incomplete neutrophil recovery at the day of the next scheduled cycle. In the 10-day interval cohort it was feasible to increase the paclitaxel dose to 175 mg m–2. The haematological and non-haematological toxicity was relatively mild. No cumulative myelosuppression was observed over at least three consecutive cycles. In combination with G-CSF, epirubicin 75 mg m–2 and paclitaxel 175 mg m–2 could be safely administered every 10 days over at least three cycles, enabling a dose intensity of 52 and 122 mg m–2 per week, respectively. © 2000 Cancer Research Campaign

Similar content being viewed by others

Dose-dense sequential adjuvant chemotherapy in the trastuzumab era: final long-term results of the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group Phase III HE10/05 Trial

Article 24 May 2022

Impact of dose-dense neoadjuvant chemotherapy on pathologic response and survival for HER2-positive breast cancer patients who receive trastuzumab

Article Open access 11 June 2021

Conventional versus reverse sequence of neoadjuvant epirubicin/cyclophosphamide and docetaxel: sequencing results from ABCSG-34

Article 24 March 2021

Article PDF

Change history

  • 16 November 2011

    This paper was modified 12 months after initial publication to switch to Creative Commons licence terms, as noted at publication

References

  • Brambilla C, Rossi A, Bonfante V, Ferrari L, Villani F, Crippa F and Bonadonna G (1986) Phase II study of doxorubicin versus epirubicin in advanced breast cancer. Cancer Treatment Report 70: 261–266

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Catimel G, Spielmann M, Dieras V, Kayitalire L, Pouillart P, Guastalla JP, Soler-Michel P, Graffand N, Garet F, Dumortier A, Pellae-Cosset B and Chazard M (1996) Phase I study of paclitaxel and epirubicin in patients with metastatic breast cancer: a preliminary report on safety. Semin Oncol 23: 24–27

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Conte PF, Michelotti A, Baldini E, Salvadori B, Gennari A, Da Prato M, Tibaldi C, Salzano E and Gentile A (1996) A dose-finding study of epirubicin in combination with paclitaxel in the treatment of advanced breast cancer. Semin Oncol 21: 28–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Conte PF, Baldini E, Gennari A, Michelotti A, Salvadori B, Tibaldi C, Danesi R, Innocenti F, Gentile A, Dell’Anna R, Biadi O, Mariani M and Del Tacca M (1997) Dose-finding study and pharmacokinetics of epirubicin and paclitaxel over 3 hours: a regimen with high activity and low cardiotoxicity in advanced breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 15: 2510–2517

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • de Wit R, Verweij J, Bontenbal M, Kruit WH, Seynaeve C, Schmitz PI and Stoter G (1996) Adverse effect on bone marrow protection of prechemotherapy granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support [see comments]. J Natl Cancer Inst 88: 1393–1398

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhauer EA, ten Bokkel Huinink WW, Swenerton KD, Gianni L, Myles J, van der Burg ME, Kerr I, Vermorken JB, Buser K and Colombo N (1994) European-Canadian randomized trial of paclitaxel in relapsed ovarian cancer: high-dose versus low-dose and long versus short infusion. J Clin Oncol 12: 2654–2666

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fisherman JS, McCabe M, Noone M, Ognibene FP, Goldspiel B, Venzon DJ, Cowan KH and O’Shaughnessy JA (1993) Phase I study of Taxol, doxorubicin, plus granulocyte-colony stimulating factor in patients with metastatic breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst Monograph 189–194

  • Gehl J, Boesgaard M, Paaske T, Vittrup Jensen B and Dombernowsky P (1996) Combined doxorubicin and paclitaxel in advanced breast cancer: effective and cardiotoxic. Ann Oncol 7: 687–693

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gennari A, Salvadori B, Donati S, Bengala C, Orlandini C, Danesi R, Del Tacca M, Bruzzi P and Conte PF (1999) Cardiotoxicity of epirubicin/paclitaxel-containing regimens: role of cardiac risk factors. J Clin Oncol 17: 3596–3602

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gianni L, Munzone E, Capri G, Villani F, Spreafico C, Tarenzi E, Fulfaro F, Caraceni A, Martini C and Laffranchi A 1995 a) Paclitaxel in metastatic breast cancer: a trial of two doses by a 3-hour infusion in patients with disease recurrence after prior therapy with anthracyclines. J Natl Cancer Inst 87: 1169–1175

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gianni L 1995 b) Theoretical and practical aspects of paclitaxel scheduling. Ann Oncol 6: 861–863

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gianni L, Munzone E, Capri G, Fulfaro F, Tarenzi E, Villani F, Spreafico C, Laffranchi A, Caraceni A and Martini C 1995 c) Paclitaxel by 3-hour infusion in combination with bolus doxorubicin in women with untreated metastatic breast cancer: high antitumor efficacy and cardiac effects in a dose-finding and sequence-finding study. J Clin Oncol 13: 2688–2699

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gilewski TA and Norton L (1996) Cytokinetics and breast cancer chemotherapy. In: Diseases of the Breast Harris JR, Lippman ME, Morrow M, Hellman S (eds) pp 751–768, Lippincott-Raven: Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson IC, Hayes DF and Gelman R (1988) Dose-response in the treatment of breast cancer: a critical review. J Clin Oncol 6: 1501–1515

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hortobagyi GN, Willey J, Rahman Z, Holmes FA, Theriault RL and Buzdar AU (1997) Prospective assessment of cardiac toxicity during a randomized phase II trial of doxorubicin and paclitaxel in metastatic breast cancer. Semin Oncol 24: 65–68

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jain KK, Casper ES, Geller NL, Hakes TB, Kaufman RJ, Currie V, Schwartz W, Cassidy C, Petroni GR and Young CW (1985) A prospective randomized comparison of epirubicin and doxorubicin in patients with advanced breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 3: 818–826

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kobrinsky NL, Sjolander DE, Cheang MS, Levitt R and Steen PD (1999) Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor treatment before doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide chemotherapy priming in women with early-stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 17: 3426–3430

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lalisang RI, Wils JA, Nortier HW, Burghouts JT, Hupperets PS, Erdkamp FL, Schouten HC and Blijham GH (1997) Comparative study of dose escalation versus interval reduction to obtain dose-intensification of epirubicin and cyclophosphamide with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in advanced breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 15: 1367–1376

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Luck HJ, Thomssen C, du Bois A, Untch M, Lisboa B, Kohler G and Diergarten K (1997) Phase II study of paclitaxel and epirubicin as first-line therapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Semin Oncol 24: 35–39

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Miller AB, Hoogstraten B, Staquet M and Winkler A (1981) Reporting results of cancer treatment. Cancer 47: 207–214

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nabholtz JM, Gelmon K, Bontenbal M, Spielmann M, Catimel G, Conte P, Klaassen U, Namer M, Bonneterre J, Fumoleau P and Winograd B (1996) Multicenter, randomized comparative study of two doses of paclitaxel in patients with metastatic breast cancer (see comments). J Clin Oncol 14: 1858–1867

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sledge Jr GW, Robert N, Sparano JA, Cobeligh M, Goldstein LJ, Neuberg D, Rowinsky E, Baughman C and McCaskill-Stevens W (1994) Paclitaxel (Taxol)/doxorubicin combinations in advanced breast cancer: the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group experience. Semin Oncol 21: 15–18

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tjan-Heijnen VC, Biesma B, Festen J, Splinter TA, Cox A, Wagener DJ and Postmus PE (1998) Enhanced myelotoxicity due to granulocyte colony-stimulating factor administration until 48 hours before the next chemotherapy course in patients with small-cell lung carcinoma (see comments). J Clin Oncol 16: 2708–2714

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vadhan-Raj S, Broxmeyer HE, Hittelman WN, Papadopoulos NE, Chawla SP, Fenoglio C, Cooper S, Buescher ES, Frenck RWJ and Holian A (1992) Abrogating chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression by recombinant granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor in patients with sarcoma: protection at the progenitor cell level. J Clin Oncol 10: 1266–1277

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Departments of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Hospital, PO Box 5800, Maastricht, 6202, AZ

    R I Lalisang, H F Hillen & H C Schouten

  2. Utrecht University Hospital, PO Box 85500, Utrecht, 3508, GA

    E E Voest & G H Blijham

  3. St. Laurentius Hospital, PO Box 620, Roermond, 6040, AX

    J A Wils

  4. Diaconessen Hospital, PO Box 80250, Utrecht, 3508, GA

    J W Nortier

  5. Maasland Hospital, PO Box 5500, Sittard, 6130, MB

    F L Erdkamp

  6. Atrium Medical Centre, PO Box 255, Brunssum, 6440, AG, The Netherlands

    J Wals

Authors
  1. R I Lalisang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. E E Voest
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. J A Wils
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. J W Nortier
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. F L Erdkamp
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. H F Hillen
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. J Wals
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. H C Schouten
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. G H Blijham
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

From twelve months after its original publication, this work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lalisang, R., Voest, E., Wils, J. et al. Dose-dense epirubicin and paclitaxel with G-CSF: a study of decreasing intervals in metastatic breast cancer. Br J Cancer 82, 1914–1919 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1054/bjoc.2000.1202

Download citation

  • Received: 07 April 1999

  • Revised: 23 November 1999

  • Accepted: 24 February 2000

  • Published: 23 May 2000

  • Issue date: 01 June 2000

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1054/bjoc.2000.1202

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • combination chemotherapy
  • breast neoplasms
  • dose-intensive
  • epirubicin
  • paclitaxel

This article is cited by

  • Epirubicin and paclitaxel with G-CSF support in first line metastatic breast cancer: a randomized phase II study of dose-dense and dose-escalated chemotherapy

    • R. I. Lalisang
    • F. L. G. Erdkamp
    • H. C. Schouten

    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment (2011)

  • Epidemiology of treatment-associated mucosal injury after treatment with newer regimens for lymphoma, breast, lung, or colorectal cancer

    • Jeffrey A. Jones
    • Elenir B. C. Avritscher
    • Linda S. Elting

    Supportive Care in Cancer (2006)

  • High-dose epirubicin, preceded by dexrazoxane, given in combination with paclitaxel plus filgrastim provides an effective mobilizing regimen to support three courses of high-dose dense chemotherapy in patients with high-risk stage II–IIIA breast cancer

    • U De Giorgi
    • G Rosti
    • M Marangolo

    Bone Marrow Transplantation (2003)

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Current issue
  • Collections
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Journal Information
  • Open access publishing
  • About the Editors
  • Contact
  • Special Issues
  • For Advertisers
  • Subscribe

Publish with us

  • For Authors & Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

British Journal of Cancer (Br J Cancer)

ISSN 1532-1827 (online)

ISSN 0007-0920 (print)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2025 Springer Nature Limited