Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

British Journal of Cancer
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. british journal of cancer
  3. regular article
  4. article
C-myc amplification in breast cancer: a meta-analysis of its occurrence and prognostic relevance
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Regular Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 05 December 2000

C-myc amplification in breast cancer: a meta-analysis of its occurrence and prognostic relevance

  • S L Deming1,
  • S J Nass2,
  • R B Dickson1 &
  • …
  • B J Trock1 

British Journal of Cancer volume 83, pages 1688–1695 (2000)Cite this article

  • 3913 Accesses

  • 256 Citations

  • 3 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

This article has been updated

Abstract

Data from basic research suggests that amplification of the proto-oncogene c-myc is important in breast cancer pathogenesis, but its frequency of amplification and prognostic relevance in human studies have been inconsistent. In an effort to clarify the clinical significance of c-myc amplification in breast cancer, we conducted a comprehensive literature search and a meta-analysis in which 29 studies were evaluated. The weighted average frequency of c-myc amplification in breast tumours was 15.7% (95% CI = 12.5–18.8%), although estimates in individual studies exhibited significant heterogeneity, P<0.0001. C-myc amplification exhibited significant but weak associations with tumour grade (RR = 1.61), lymph-node metastasis (RR = 1.24), negative progesterone receptor status (RR = 1.27), and postmenopausal status (RR = 0.82). Amplification was significantly associated with risk of relapse and death, with pooled estimates RR = 2.05 (95% CI = 1.51–2.78) and RR = 1.74 (95% CI = 1.27–2.39), respectively. This effect did not appear to be merely a surrogate for other prognostic factors. These results suggest that c-myc amplification is relatively common in breast cancer and may provide independent prognostic information. More rigorous studies with consistent methodology are required to validate this association, and to investigate its potential as a molecular predictor of specific therapy response. © 2000 Cancer Research Campaign http://www.bjcancer.com

Similar content being viewed by others

Clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic significance of casting-type calcifications in patients with invasive breast cancer presenting with microcalcification

Article Open access 10 June 2024

A UK prospective multicentre decision impact, decision conflict and economic evaluation of the 21-gene assay in women with node+ve, hormone receptor+ve, HER2-ve breast cancer

Article Open access 02 February 2024

Clinical impact of primary tumour location, early tumour shrinkage, and depth of response in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer with first-line chemotherapy plus cetuximab or bevacizumab

Article Open access 13 November 2020

Article PDF

Change history

  • 16 November 2011

    This paper was modified 12 months after initial publication to switch to Creative Commons licence terms, as noted at publication

References

  • Adnane J, Gaudray P, Simon MP, Simony-Lafontaine J, Jeanteur P and Theillet C (1989) Proto-oncogene amplification and human breast tumor phenotype. Oncogene 4: 1389–1395

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Alitalo K, Schwab M and Lin CC (1983) Homogeneously staining chromosomal regions contain amplified copies of an abundantly expressed cellular oncogene (c-myc) in colon carcinoma. PNAS 80: 1707–1711

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Berns EMJJ, Klijn JGM, van Puten WLJ, van Staveren IL, Portengen H and Foekens JA (1992 a) C-myc amplification is a better prognostic factor than HER2/neu amplification in primary breast cancer. Cancer Res 52: 1101–1113

    Google Scholar 

  • Berns EMJJ, Klijn JGM, van Staveren IL, Portengen H, Noordegraaf E and Foekens JA (1992 b) Prevalence of amplification of the oncogenes c-myc, HER2/neu, and int-2 in one thousand human breast tumors: Correlation with steroid receptors. Eur J Cancer 28: 697–700

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bieche I, Champeme MH and Liderau R (1994) A tumor suppressor gene on chromosome 1p32-pter controls the amplification of MYC family genes in breast cancer. Cancer Res 54: 4274–4276

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bonilla M, Ramirez M, Lopez-Cueto J and Gariglio P (1988) In vivo amplification and rearrangement of c-myc oncogene in human breast tumors. J Natl Cancer Inst 80: 665–671

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Borg A, Baldetorp B, Ferno M, Olsson H and Sigurdsson H (1992) c-myc is an independent prognostic factor in postmenopausal breast cancer. Int J Cancer 51: 687–691

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Breslow NE and Day NE (1987) Statistical methods in cancer research, Vol II. IARC Scientific Publication 94–2789, pp 110–112. IARC: Lyon, France

    Google Scholar 

  • Brouillet JP, Theillet C, Maudelonde T, Defrenne A, Simony-Lafontaine J, Sertour J, Pujol H, Jeanteur P and Rochefort H (1990) Cathepsin D assay in primary breast cancer and lymph nodes: Relationship with c-myc, c-erbB-2, and int-2 oncogene amplification and node invasiveness. Eur J Cancer 26: 437–441

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Champeme MH, Bieche I, Hacen K and Lidereau R (1994) Oncogene amplification per se: an independent prognostic factor in human breast cancer. Mol Carcinog 11: 189–191

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cline M, Battifora H and Yokota J (1987) Proto-oncogene abnormalities in human breast cancer: Correlations with anatomic features and clinical course of disease. J Clin Oncol 5: 999–1006

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Contegiacomo A, Pizzi C, Demarchis L, Alimandi M, Delrio P, Dipalma E, Petrella G, Ottini L, French D, Frati L and Bianco AR (1995) High cell kinetics is associated with amplification of the Int-2, Bcl-1, Myc and ErbB-2 protooncogenes and loss of heterozygosity at the DF3 locus in primary breast cancers. Int J Cancer 61: 1–6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Courjal F, Cuny M and Simony-Lafontaine J (1997) Mapping of DNA amplification at 15 chromosomal localizations in 1875 breast tumors: Definition of phenotypic groups. Cancer Res 57: 4360–4367

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dalla-Farera R, Wong-Staal F and Gallo RC (1985) One gene amplification in promyelocytic leukaemaia cell line HL-60 and primary leukaemic cells of the same patient. Nature 299: 61–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Dang CV (1999) C-myc target genes involved in cell growth, apoptosis, and metabolism. Mol Cell Biol 19: 1–14

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Dickersin K and Berlin JA (1992) Meta-analysis: state-of-the-science. Epidemiologic Rev 14: 154–176

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards PA, Ward JL and Bradbury JM (1988) Alteration of morphogenesis by the c-myc oncogene in transplants of mammary gland. Oncogene 2: 407–412

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Escot C, Theillet C, Linderiau R, Spyratos F, Champeme MH, Gest J and Callahan R (1986) Genetic alteration of the c-myc protooncogene (MYC) in human primary breast carcinomas. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 83: 4834–4839

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Fleiss JL (1981) Statistical methods for rates and proportions. John Wiley and Sons: New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia I, Dietrich PY, Aapro M, Vauthier G, Vadas L and Engel F (1989) Genetic alteration of c-myc, c-erbB-2, and c-Ha-ras protooncogenes and clinical associations in human breast carcinomas. Cancer Res 49: 6675–6679

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • George SL and Desu MM (1974) Planning the size and duration of a clinical trial studying the time to some critical event. J Chronic Dis 27: 15–24

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Guerin M, Barrois M, Terrier MJ, Spielmann M and Riou G (1988) Overexpression of either c-myc or c-erbB-2/neu proto-oncogenes in human breast carcinomas: correlation with poor prognosis. Oncogene Res 3: 21–31

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harada Y, Katagiri T, Ito I, Akiyama F, Sakamoto G, Kasumi F, Nakamura Y and Emi M (1994) Genetic studies of 457 breast cancers, clinicopathologic parameters compared with genetic alterations. Cancer 74: 2281–2286

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes DF, Trock B and Harris AL (1998) Assessing the clinical impact of prognostic factors: when is ‘statistically significant’ clinically useful?. Breast Cancer Res Treat 52: 305–319

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Janocko LE and Lucke JF (1995) Assessing sequential oncogene amplification in human breast cancer. Cytometry 21: 18–22

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins RB, Qian J, Lieger MM and Bostwick DG (1997) Detection of c-myc oncogene amplification and chromosomal anomalies in metastatic prostatic carcinoma by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Cancer Res 57: 524–31

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kleinbaum DG, Kupper LL and Morgenstern H (1982) Epidemiologic Research, p 359. Van Nostrand Reinhold Co: New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreipe H, Fischer L, Felgner J, Heidorn K, Mettler L and Parwaresch R (1993) Amplification of c-myc, but not c-erbB2 is associated with high proliferative capacity in breast cancer. Cancer Res 53: 1956–1961

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Leder A, Pattengale PK, Kuo A, Stewart T and Leder P (1986) Consequences of widespread deregulation of the c-myc gene in transgenic mice: multiple noeoplasms and normal development. Cell 45: 485–495

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Little CD, Nau MM and Carney DN (1985) Amplification and expression of the c-myc oncogene in human lung cancer cell lines. Nature 306: 194–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lonn U, Lonn S, Nilsson B and Stenkvist B (1995) Prognositic value of the erbB-2 and myc amplification in breast cancer imprints. Cancer 75: 2681–2687

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mertens F, Johansson B, Hoglund M and Mitelman F (1997) Chromosomal imbalance maps of malignant solid tumors: a cytogenetic survey of 3185 neoplasms. Cancer Res 57: 2765–2780

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Meyers S, O'Brien M, Smith T and Dudley J (1990) Analysis of the int-1, int-2, c-myc, and neu oncogenes in human breast carcinomas. Cancer Res 50: 5911–5918

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Munzel P, Marx D, Kochei H, Schauer A and Bock KW (1991) Genomic alterations of the c-myc proto-oncogene in relation to the overexpression of c-erbB-2 and KI-67 in human breast and cervix carcinomas. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 117: 603–607

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nagayama K and Watatani M (1993) Analysis of genetic alterations related to the development and progression of breast carcinoma. Jpn J Cancer Res 84: 1159–1164

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Nass SJ and Dickson RB (1997) Defining a role for c-myc in breast tumorigenesis. Breast Cancer Res Treat 44: 1–22

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ottestad L, Andersen T, Hesland J, Skrede M, Tveit K, Nustad K and Borresen AL (1993) Amplification of c-erbB-2, int-2 and c-myc genes in node-negative breast carcinomas. Acta Oncologica 3: 289–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prados J, Melguizo C, Fernandez A, Aranega AE, Alvarez L and Aranega A (1996) Inverse expression of mdr 1 and c-myc genes in a rhabdomyosarcoma cell line resistant to actinomycin D. J Pathol 180: 86–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riva-Lavielle C (1994) Drug resistance, oncogenes, and anti-oncogenes in epithelial tumours. Bull Cancer 81: 105s–111s

    Google Scholar 

  • Roux-Dosseto M, Romain S, Dussault N, Desideri C, Piana L, Bonnier P, Tubiana N and Martin PM (1992) C-myc gene amplification in selected node-negative breast cancer patients correlates with high rate of early relapse. Eur J Cancer 28A: 1600–1604

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scorilas A, Yotis J, Gouriotis D, Keramopoulos A, Ampela K, Trangas T and Talieri M (1993) Cathepsin-D and c-erb-B2 have an additive prognostic value for breast cancer patients. Anticancer Res 13: 1895–1900

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scorilas A, Yotis J, Stravolemos K, Gouriotis D, Keramopolous A, Ampela K, Talieri M and Trangas T (1995) c-erbB-2 overexpression may be used as an independent prognostic factor for breast cancer patients. Anticancer Res 15: 1543–1548

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sierra A, Castellsague X, Escobedo A, Moreno A, Drudis T and Fabra A (1999) Synergistic cooperation between c-Myc and Bcl-2 in lymph node progression of T1 human breast carcinomas. Breast Cancer Res Treat 54: 39–45

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Soengas MS, Alarcon RM, Yoshida H, Giaccia AJ, Hakem R, Mak TW and Lowe SW (1999) Apaf-1 and Caspase-9 in p53 dependent apoptosis and tumor inhibition. Science 284: 156–159

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tavassoli M, Quirke P, Farzaneh F, Lock NJ, Mayne LV and Kirkham N (1989) C-erbB-2/cerbA coamplification indicative of lymph node metastais, and c-myc amplification of high tumor grade, in human breast carcinoma. Br J Cancer 60: 505–510

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Trock BJ, Leonessa F and Clarke R (1997) Multidrug resistance in breast cancer: a meta-analysis of MDR1/gp 170 expression and its possible functional significance. J Natl Cancer Inst 13: 917–931

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsuda H, Hirahashi S, Shiomosata Y, Hirota T, Tsugane S, Yamamoto H, Miyajima N, Toyoshima K, Yamamoto T, Yokota J, Yoshida T, Sakamura H, Terada M and Sugimura T (1989) Correlation between long-term survival in breast cancer patients and amplification of two putative oncogene-coamplification units hst-1/int-2 c-erbB-2/ear-1. Cancer Res 49: 3104–3108

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Varley JM, Swallow JE, Brammar WJ, Whittaker JL and Walker RA (1987) Alteration to either c-erbB-2 (neu) or c-myc proto-oncogenes in breast carcinomas correlate with poor short-term prognosis. Oncogene 1: 423–430

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Varmus HE (1984) The molecular genetics of cellular oncogenes. Annu Rev Genet 15: 553–612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker TL, White JD, Esdale WJ, Burton MA and De Cruz EE (1996) Tumour cells surviving in vivo cisplatin chemotherapy display elevated c-myc expression. Br J Cancer 73: 610–614

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Watson PH, Safneck JR, Lee K, Dubik D and Shiu RPC (1993) Relationship of c-myc amplification to progression of breast cancer from in situ to invasive tumor and lymph node metastasis. J Natl Cancer Inst, 902–907

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Watson PH, Singh R and Hole A (1996) Influence of c-myc on the preogression of human breast cancer. Curr Topic Microbiol Immunol 213: 267–283

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yamashita H, Kobayashi S, Iwase H, Itoh Y, Kuzushima T, Iwata H, Itoh K, Naito A, Yamashita T, Masaoka A and Kimura N (1993) Analysis of oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes in human breast cancer. Jpn J Cancer Res 84: 871–878

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou DJ, Ahuja H and Cline MJ (1989) Proto-oncogene abnormalities in human breast cancer: c-erbB-2 amplification does not correlate with recurrence of disease. Oncogene 4: 105–108

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Oncology and Lombardi Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Wisconsin Avenue, Washington, 20007, DC

    S L Deming, R B Dickson & B J Trock

  2. Oncology Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, 21231, MD, USA

    S J Nass

Authors
  1. S L Deming
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. S J Nass
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. R B Dickson
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. B J Trock
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

From twelve months after its original publication, this work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Deming, S., Nass, S., Dickson, R. et al. C-myc amplification in breast cancer: a meta-analysis of its occurrence and prognostic relevance. Br J Cancer 83, 1688–1695 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1054/bjoc.2000.1522

Download citation

  • Received: 10 February 2000

  • Revised: 22 August 2000

  • Accepted: 24 August 2000

  • Published: 05 December 2000

  • Issue date: 01 December 2000

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1054/bjoc.2000.1522

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • c-myc
  • amplification
  • breast cancer
  • prognostic markers
  • meta-analysis

This article is cited by

  • Integrative multi-omic sequencing reveals the MMTV-Myc mouse model mimics human breast cancer heterogeneity

    • Carson D. Broeker
    • Mylena M. O. Ortiz
    • Eran R. Andrechek

    Breast Cancer Research (2023)

  • Pan-cancer pseudogene RNA analysis reveals a regulatory network promoting cancer cell proliferation

    • Mengbiao Guo
    • Jingkai Zhang
    • Yuanyan Xiong

    Genome Instability & Disease (2023)

  • A MYC-ZNF148-ID1/3 regulatory axis modulating cancer stem cell traits in aggressive breast cancer

    • Mijeong Kim
    • Manjot Singh
    • Andrew J. Woo

    Oncogenesis (2022)

  • Prognostic value of glutaminase 1 in breast cancer depends on H3K27me3 expression and menopausal status

    • Meng Zhou
    • Qian-xin Chen
    • Ze-fang Ren

    Virchows Archiv (2022)

  • Assessment of the WAP-Myc mouse mammary tumor model for spontaneous metastasis

    • Begüm Utz
    • Rita Turpin
    • Juha Klefström

    Scientific Reports (2020)

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Current issue
  • Collections
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Journal Information
  • Open access publishing
  • About the Editors
  • Contact
  • Special Issues
  • For Advertisers
  • Subscribe

Publish with us

  • For Authors & Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

British Journal of Cancer (Br J Cancer)

ISSN 1532-1827 (online)

ISSN 0007-0920 (print)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2025 Springer Nature Limited