Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

British Journal of Cancer
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. british journal of cancer
  3. regular article
  4. article
Results of three-year mass screening programme for lung cancer using mobile low-dose spiral computed tomography scanner
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Regular Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 03 January 2001

Results of three-year mass screening programme for lung cancer using mobile low-dose spiral computed tomography scanner

  • S Sone1,5,6,
  • F Li1,5,
  • Z-G Yang1,5,
  • T Honda2,
  • Y Maruyama1,
  • S Takashima1,
  • M Hasegawa1,
  • S Kawakami1,
  • K Kubo3,
  • M Haniuda4 &
  • …
  • T Yamanda4 

British Journal of Cancer volume 84, pages 25–32 (2001)Cite this article

  • 3438 Accesses

  • 457 Citations

  • 15 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

This article has been updated

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of annual screening for lung cancer by low-dose computed tomography (CT) and the characteristics of identified lung cancers. Subjects consisted of 5483 general population aged 40–74 years, who received initial CT scans in 1996, followed by repeat annual scans for most subjects in 1997 and 1998, with a total of 13 786 scans taken during 1996–1998. Work-up examinations for patients with suspicious lesions were conducted using diagnostic CTs. The initial screening in 1996 detected suspicious nodules in 279 (5.1%) of 5483 subjects, and 22 (8%) were confirmed surgically to have lung cancer. Corresponding figures in 1997 and 1998 screening studies were 173 (3.9%) of 4425 and 25 (14%) of 173, and 136 (3.5%) of 3878 and 9 (7%) of 136, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of detecting surgically confirmed lung cancer were 55% (22/40) and 95% (4960/5199) in 1996 and 83% (25/30) and 97% (4113/4252) in 1997 screening, respectively. 88% (55/60) of lung cancers identified on screening and surgically confirmed were AJCC stage IA. Our trial allowed detection of nearly 11 times the expected annual number of early lung cancers. Repeat CT allowed the detection of more aggressive, rapidly growing lung cancers, compared to those in the initial screening. © 2001 Cancer Research Campaign

Similar content being viewed by others

LDCT screening results among eligible and ineligible screening candidates in preventive health check-ups population: a real world study in West China

Article Open access 28 February 2024

China Protocol for early screening, precise diagnosis, and individualized treatment of lung cancer

Article Open access 27 May 2025

Risk-based lung cancer screening performance in a universal healthcare setting

Article 19 April 2024

Article PDF

Change history

  • 16 November 2011

    This paper was modified 12 months after initial publication to switch to Creative Commons licence terms, as noted at publication

References

  • Eddy DM (1981) The economics of cancer prevention and detection: Getting more or less. Cancer 47: 1200–1209

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Flehinger BJ, Kimmel M, Polyak T and Melamed MR (1993) Screening for lung cancer. The Mayo lung cancer project revisited. Cancer 72: 1573–1580

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Henschke CI, Miettinen OS, Yankelevitz DF, Libby DM and Smith JP (1994) Radiographic screening for cancer. Proposed paradigm for requisite research. Clinical Imaging 18: 16–20

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Henschke CI, MacCauley DI, Yankelevitz DF, Naidich DP, McGuinness, Miettinen OS, Libby DM, Pasmantier MW, Koizumi J, Altorki NK and Smith JP (1999) Early lung cancer action project: Overall design and findings from baseline screening. Lancet 354: 99–105

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kaneko M, Eguchi K, Ohmatsu H, Kakinuma R, Naruke T, Suemasu K and Moriyama N (1996) Peripheral lung cancer: screening and detection with low-dose spiral CT versus radiography. Radiology 201: 798–802

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Landis SH, Murray T, Bolden S and Wingo PA (1998) Cancer Statistics. California. Cancer J Clin 48: 6–29

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mountain CF (1997) Revisions in the international system for staging lung cancer. Chest 111: 1710–1717

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nishizawa K, Iwai K, Matsumoto T, Sakashita K, Iinuma TA, Tateno Y, Miyamoto T, Shimura A and Takagi H (1996) Estimation of the exposure and a risk-benefit analysis for a CT system designed for a lung cancer mass screening unit. Radiation Protection Dosimetry 67: 101–108

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oda M, Watanabe Y, Shimizu J, Murakami S, Ohta Y, Sekido N, Watanabe S, Ishikawa N and Nonomura A (1998) Extent of mediastinal node metastasis in clinical stage 1 non-small-cell lung cancer: The role of systematic nodal dissection. Lung Cancer 22: 23–30

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sagawa M, Saito Y, Takahashi S, Takahashi S, Usuda K, Kamma K, Sato M, Ota S, Nagamoto N, Fujimura S, Nakada N, Hashimoto K, Suda H, Imai T and Saito H (1990) Clinical and prognostic assessment of patients with resected small peripheral lung cancer lesions. Cancer 66: 2653–2657

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Soda H, Tomita H, Kohno S and Oka M (1993) Limitation of annual screening chest radiography for the diagnosis of lung cancer. Cancer 72: 2341–2346

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sone S, Takashima S, Li F, Yang Z-G, Honda T, Maruyama Y, Hasegawa M, Yamanda T, Kubo K, Hanamura K and Asakura K (1998) Mass screening for lung cancer with a mobile spiral computed tomography scanner. Lancet 351: 1242–1245

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sone S, Li F, Yang Z-G, Takashima S, Maruyama Y, Hasegawa M, Wang JC, Kawakami S and Honda T (2000) Characteristics of small lung cancers invisible on conventional chest radiography and detected by population-based screening using spiral CT. Br J Radiol 73: 137–145

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiology, 3-1-1 Asahi, Matsumoto, 390-8621, Japan

    S Sone, F Li, Z-G Yang, Y Maruyama, S Takashima, M Hasegawa & S Kawakami

  2. Department of Laboratory Medicine, 3-1-1 Asahi, Matsumoto, 390-8621, Japan

    T Honda

  3. Department of Internal Medicine, 3-1-1 Asahi, Matsumoto, 390-8621, Japan

    K Kubo

  4. Department of Surgery, Shinshu University School of Medicine, 3-1-1 Asahi, Matsumoto, 390-8621, Japan

    M Haniuda & T Yamanda

  5. Telecommunications Advancement Organisation of Japan, Matsumoto Research Centre, Shinshu University School of Medicine, 3-1-1 Asahi, Matsumoto, 390-8621, Japan

    S Sone, F Li & Z-G Yang

  6. JA Azumi General Hospital, 3207-1 Ikeda, Nagano, 399-8695, Japan

    S Sone

Authors
  1. S Sone
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. F Li
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Z-G Yang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. T Honda
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Y Maruyama
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. S Takashima
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. M Hasegawa
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. S Kawakami
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. K Kubo
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  10. M Haniuda
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  11. T Yamanda
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

From twelve months after its original publication, this work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sone, S., Li, F., Yang, ZG. et al. Results of three-year mass screening programme for lung cancer using mobile low-dose spiral computed tomography scanner. Br J Cancer 84, 25–32 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1054/bjoc.2000.1531

Download citation

  • Received: 27 April 2000

  • Revised: 31 August 2000

  • Accepted: 13 September 2000

  • Published: 03 January 2001

  • Issue date: 05 January 2001

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1054/bjoc.2000.1531

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • lung cancer
  • screening
  • low-dose computed tomography (CT)

This article is cited by

  • Review of carcinogenicity of asbestos and proposal of approval standards of an occupational cancer caused by asbestos in Korea

    • Sanghyuk Im
    • Kan-woo Youn
    • Sang-Jun Choi

    Annals of Occupational and Environmental Medicine (2015)

  • Multiparametric PET/CT-perfusion does not add significant additional information for initial staging in lung cancer compared with standard PET/CT

    • Martin W Huellner
    • Timothy D Collen
    • Patrick Veit-Haibach

    EJNMMI Research (2014)

  • Lung cancer screening: from imaging to biomarker

    • Dong Xiang
    • Bicheng Zhang
    • Carl Freter

    Biomarker Research (2013)

  • Small peripheral lung carcinomas with five-year post-surgical follow-up: assessment by semi-automated volumetric measurement of tumour size, CT value and growth rate on TSCT

    • Shusuke Sone
    • Takaomi Hanaoka
    • Takayuki Honda

    European Radiology (2012)

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Current issue
  • Collections
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Journal Information
  • Open access publishing
  • About the Editors
  • Contact
  • Special Issues
  • For Advertisers
  • Subscribe

Publish with us

  • For Authors & Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

British Journal of Cancer (Br J Cancer)

ISSN 1532-1827 (online)

ISSN 0007-0920 (print)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2025 Springer Nature Limited