Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

British Journal of Cancer
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. british journal of cancer
  3. regular article
  4. article
Predicted long-term mortality reduction associated with the second round of breast screening in East Anglia
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Regular Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 30 January 2001

Predicted long-term mortality reduction associated with the second round of breast screening in East Anglia

  • J McCann1,
  • S Duffy2 &
  • N Day3 

British Journal of Cancer volume 84, pages 423–428 (2001)Cite this article

  • 611 Accesses

  • 24 Citations

  • Metrics details

This article has been updated

Abstract

Randomized trials have demonstrated that mammographic screening can reduce breast cancer mortality. Our aim was to estimate the reduction in mortality expected from the East Anglian breast screening programme. Breast screening achieves benefit by improving cancer prognosis (reducing tumour size, nodal involvement and possibly grade) through earlier diagnosis. We compared cancer prognosis between women invited for screening and those not yet invited in East Anglia, UK, in order to predict the mortality reduction achievable by screening, independently of any reduction due to changes in treatment and underlying disease. Participants (both invited and not-yet invited) were women eligible for invitation to first and second screens and diagnosed with invasive breast cancer in 1989–96. Death rates were predicted based on the observed distribution of tumour grade, size and node status amongst 950 cancers diagnosed following first invitation, up to and including at second screen (excluding those detected at first screening), and 451 cancers presenting symptomatically in women awaiting first invitation during the staggered introduction of screening, after adjustment for lead time amongst screen detected cases. For all ages, the ratio of predicted breast cancer mortality in the invited compared with the uninvited group was 0.85 (95% CI 0.78, 0.93). It was 0.93 (0.80, 1.08) for women aged 50–54 at diagnosis and 0.81 (0.72, 0.91) for those aged 55–64. We conclude that, by 2004, the second round of screening in East Anglia should reduce mortality by around 7% in women below age 55 at diagnosis, and by around 19% in those aged 55–64. © 2001 Cancer Research Campaign http://www.bjcancer.com

Similar content being viewed by others

A case-control study to evaluate the impact of the breast screening programme on mortality in England

Article Open access 23 November 2020

An updated PREDICT breast cancer prognostic model including the benefits and harms of radiotherapy

Article Open access 15 January 2024

The cost-effectiveness of risk-stratified breast cancer screening in the UK

Article Open access 17 October 2023

Article PDF

Change history

  • 16 November 2011

    This paper was modified 12 months after initial publication to switch to Creative Commons licence terms, as noted at publication

References

  • Beral V, Herman C, Reeves G and Peto R (1995) Sudden fall in breast cancer death rates in England and Wales. Lancet 345: 1642–1643

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blanks RG, Moss SM, McGahan C, Quinn M and Babb PJ (2000) Effect of NHS breast screening programme on mortality from breast cancer in England and Wales 1990–98: Comparison of observed with predicted mortality. Br Med J 321: 665–669

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen HH, Duffy S, Tabar L and Day NE (1997) Markov chain models for the progression of breast cancer, part 1: tumour attributes and the preclinical screen-detectable phase. J Epidemiol Biostat 2: 9–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman MP, Babbs P, Damiecki P, Grosclaude P, Honjo S, Jones J, Knerer G, Pitard A, Quinn M, Sloggett A and De Stavola B (1999). Cancer survival trends in England and Wales 1971–1995: deprivation and NHS region. Office for National Statistics: London

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox DR (1972) Regression model and life tables. J R Stat Soc B 34: 187–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Day NE and Duffy S (1996) Trial design based on surrogate endpoints: application to a trial of different breast screening frequencies. J R Stat Soc A 159: 49–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day NE, McCann J, Camilleri-Ferrante C, Britton P, Hurst G, Cush S and Duffy S (1995) Monitoring interval cancers in breast screening programmes: the East Anglian experience. J Med Screening 2: 180–185

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Duffy S, Chen HH, Tabar L, Fagerberg G and Paci E (1996) Sojourn time, sensitivity and positive predictive value of mammography screening for breast cancer in women aged 40–49. Int J Epidemiol 25: 1139–1145

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gøtzsche PC and Olsen O (2000) Is screening for breast cancer with mammography justifiable?. Lancet 355: 129–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson BE, Pike MC, Bernstein L and Ross RK (1996) Breast cancer. In: Cancer epidemiology and prevention. Schottenfeld D Fraumeni Jr JF (eds), Oxford University Press: New York, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • McCann J, Stockton D and Day NE (1998) Breast cancer in East Anglia: the impact of the breast screening programme on stage at diagnosis. J Med Screening 5: 42–48

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison AS (1992) Early detection: sensitivity and lead time. In: Screening in Chronic Disease, pp 43–73. Oxford University Press: New York, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Organising committee collaborators and FM (1996) Breast cancer screening with mammography in women aged 40–49 years. Int J Cancer 68: 693–699

  • Peto R, Boreham J, Clarke M, Davies C and Beral V (2000) UK and USA breast cancer deaths down 25% in year 2000 at ages 20–69 years. Lancet 355: 1822–1830

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Secretary of State for Health (1992) The Health of the Nation. A strategy for health in England. London, HMSO.

  • Sjönell G and Ståhle L (1999) Mammography screening does not significantly reduce breast cancer mortality in Swedish daily practice. Lakartidningen 96: 904–913

    Google Scholar 

  • Stockton D, Davies T, Day NE and McCann J (1997) Retrospective study of reasons for improved survival in patients with breast cancer in East Anglia: earlier diagnosis or better treatment?. BMJ 314: 472–475

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tabar L, Gad A, Holmberg LH, Ljungquist U, Eklund G, Fagerberg CJG, Baldetorp L, Gröntoft O, Lundström B, Månson JC and Day NE (1985) Reduction in breast cancer mortality by mass screening with mammography: first results of a randomised trial in two Swedish counties. Lancet 1: 829–832

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tabar L, Fagerberg CJG, Day NE and Holmberg L (1987) What is the optimum interval between mammographic screening examinations? An analysis based on the latest results of the Swedish two county breast cancer screening trial. Br J Cancer 55: 547–551

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tabar L, Fagerberg CJG, Duffy S, Day NE, Gad A and Grontoft O (1992) Update of the Swedish two-county program of mammographic screening for breast cancer. Radiol Clin North Am 30: 187–209

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tabar L, Fagerberg G, Chen HH, Duffy S, Smart C, Gad A and Smith RA (1995) Efficacy of breast cancer screening by age. Cancer 75: 2507–2517

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tabar L, Duffy S, Chen HH, Vitak B and Prevost T (1999) The natural history of breast carcinoma. What have we learned from screening?. Cancer 86: 449–462

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Woodman CBJ, Threlfall AG and Boggis CRM (1995) Is the three year breast screening interval too long? Occurrence of interval cancers in the NHS breast screening programme’s north western region. BMJ 310: 224–226

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organisation (1990). International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems. World Health Organisation: Geneva

  • Young KC, Wallis MG, Blanks RG and Moss SM (1997) Influence of number of views and mammographic film density on the detection of invasive cancers: results from the NHS breast screening programme. British Journal of Radiology 70: 487–488

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Cancer Intelligence Unit, University of Cambridge Institute of Public Health, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Worts Causeway, Cambridge, CB1 8RN, UK

    J McCann

  2. Department of Mathematics, Statistics and Epidemiology, Imperial Cancer Research Fund, PO Box 123, Lincoln’s Inn Fields, London, WC2A 3PX, UK

    S Duffy

  3. Strangeways Research Laboratory, Worts Causeway, Cambridge, CB1 8RN, UK

    N Day

Authors
  1. J McCann
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. S Duffy
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. N Day
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

From twelve months after its original publication, this work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McCann, J., Duffy, S. & Day, N. Predicted long-term mortality reduction associated with the second round of breast screening in East Anglia. Br J Cancer 84, 423–428 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1054/bjoc.2000.1609

Download citation

  • Received: 13 July 2000

  • Revised: 11 September 2000

  • Accepted: 25 October 2000

  • Published: 30 January 2001

  • Issue date: 02 February 2001

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1054/bjoc.2000.1609

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • breast cancer screening
  • prognosis
  • detection mode
  • mortality

This article is cited by

  • Reduction in rate of node metastases with breast screening: consistency of association with tumor size

    • I. D. Nagtegaal
    • S. W. Duffy

    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment (2013)

  • The NHS breast cancer screening programme

    • N E Day

    British Journal of Cancer (2003)

  • Impact of false-positive mammography on subsequent screening attendance and risk of cancer

    • Jenny McCann
    • Diane Stockton
    • Sara Godward

    Breast Cancer Research (2002)

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Current issue
  • Collections
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Journal Information
  • Open access publishing
  • About the Editors
  • Contact
  • Special Issues
  • For Advertisers
  • Subscribe

Publish with us

  • For Authors & Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

British Journal of Cancer (Br J Cancer)

ISSN 1532-1827 (online)

ISSN 0007-0920 (print)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2025 Springer Nature Limited