Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

British Journal of Cancer
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. british journal of cancer
  3. regular article
  4. article
Direct evidence for a bystander effect of ionizing radiation in primary human fibroblasts
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Regular Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 27 February 2001

Direct evidence for a bystander effect of ionizing radiation in primary human fibroblasts

  • O V Belyakov1,
  • A M Malcolmson1,
  • M Folkard1,
  • K M Prise1 &
  • …
  • B D Michael1 

British Journal of Cancer volume 84, pages 674–679 (2001)Cite this article

  • 1968 Accesses

  • 198 Citations

  • 6 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

This article has been updated

Abstract

Bystander responses underlie some of the current efforts to develop gene therapy approaches for cancer treatment. Similarly, they may have a role in strategies to treat tumours with targeted radioisotopes. In this study we show direct evidence for the production of a radiation-induced bystander response in primary human fibroblasts. We utilize a novel approach of using a charged-particle microbeam, which allows individual cells within a population to be selected and targeted with counted charged particles. Individual primary human fibroblasts within a population of 600–800 cells were targeted with between 1 and 15 helium ions (effectively, α-particles). The charged particles were delivered through the centre of the nucleus with an accuracy of ± 2 μm and a detection and counting efficiency of greater than 99%. When scored 3 days later, even though only a single cell had been targeted, typically an additional 80–100 damaged cells were observed in the surviving population of about 5000 cells. The yield of damaged cells was independent of the number of charged particles delivered to the targeted cell. Similar results of a 2–3-fold increase in the background level of damage present in the population were observed whether 1 or 4 cells were targeted within the dish. Also, when 200 cells within one quadrant of the dish were exposed to radiation, there was a 2–3-fold increase in the damage level in an unexposed quadrant of the dish. This effect was independent of the presence of serum in the culture medium and was only observed when a cell was targeted, but not when only the medium was exposed, confirming that a cell-mediated response is involved. © 2001 Cancer Research Campaign

Similar content being viewed by others

Detecting radio- and chemoresistant cells in 3D cancer co-cultures using chromatin biomarkers

Article Open access 24 November 2023

The effects of cell displacement on DNA damages in targeted radiation therapy using Geant4-DNA

Article Open access 03 December 2024

Ionizing radiation triggers mitophagy to enhance DNA damage in cancer cells

Article Open access 28 July 2023

Article PDF

Change history

  • 16 November 2011

    This paper was modified 12 months after initial publication to switch to Creative Commons licence terms, as noted at publication

References

  • Abend M, Kehe K, Riedel M and Van Beuningen D (2000) Correlation of micronucleus and apoptosis assays with reproductive cell death can be improved by considering other modes of death. Int J Radiat Biol 76: 249–259

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Azzam EI, de Toledo SM, Gooding T and Little JB (1998) Intercellular communication is involved in the bystander regulation of gene expression in human cells exposed to very low fluences of alpha particles. Radiat Res 150: 497–504

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Belyakov OV, Prise KM, Mothersill C, Folkard M and Michael BD (2000) Studies of bystander effects in primary urothelial cells using a charged-particle microbeam. Radiat Res 153: 235

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishayee A, Rao DV and Howell RW (1999) Evidence for pronounced bystander effects caused by nonuniform distributions of radioactivity using a novel three-dimensional tissue culture model. Radiat Res 152: 88–97

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd M, Cunningham SH, Brown MM, Mairs RJ and Wheldon TE (1999) Noradrenaline transporter gene for radiation kill by 131I meta-iodobenzylguanidine. Gene Ther 6: 1147–1152

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Deshpande A, Goodwin EH, Bailey SM, Marrone BL and Lehnert BE (1996) Alpha-particle-induced sister chromatid exchange in normal human lung fibroblasts: Evidence for an extranuclear target. Radiat Res 145: 260–267

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Emerit I (1994) Reactive oxygen species, chromosome mutation, and cancer: possible role of clastogenic factors in carcinogenesis. Free Rad Biol Med 16: 99–109

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Folkard M, Vojnovic B, Hollis KJ, Bowey AG, Watts SJ, Schettino G, Prise KM and Michael BD (1997a) A charged particle microbeam: II A single-particle micro-collimation and detection system. Int J Radiat Biol 72: 387–395

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Folkard M, Vojnovic B, Prise KM, Bowey AG, Locke RJ, Schettino G and Michael BD (1997b) A charged-particle microbeam. I. Development of an experimental system for targeting cells individually with counted particles. Int J Radiat Biol 72: 375–385

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • ICRP: Human respiratory tract model for radiological protection A report of a Task Group of the International Commission on Radiological Protection, (1994). Ann ICRP 24: 1–482

  • Iyer R and Lehnert BE (2000) Factors underlying the cell growth-related bystander responses to alpha particles. Cancer Res 60: 1290–1298

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Khan MA, Hill RP and Van Dyk J (1998) Partial volume rat lung irradiation: an evaluation of early DNA damage. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 40: 467–476

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kerr JF, Wyllie AH and Currie AR (1972) Apoptosis: a basic biological phenomenon with wide-ranging implications in tissue kinetics. Br J Cancer 26: 239–257

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lehnert BE and Goodwin EH (1997) Extracellular factor(s) following exposure to α-particles can cause sister chromatid exchanges in normal human cells. Cancer Res 57: 2164–2171

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Little JB (2000) Radiation carcinogenesis. Carcinogenesis 21: 397–404

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lorimore SA, Kadhim MA, Pocock DA, Papworth D, Stevens DL, Goodhead DT and Wright EG (1998) Chromosomal instability in the descendants of unirradiated surviving cells after alpha-particle irradiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95: 5730–5733

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mesnil M, Piccoli C, Tiraby G, Willecke K and Yamasaki H (1996) Bystander killing of cancer cells by herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase gene is mediated by connexins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93: 1831–1835

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Michael BD, Belyakov OV, Folkard M, Malcolmson AM, Ozols A and Prise KM (2000) Implications of bystander effects for radiobiology. In: M Moriarty, C Mothersill, C Seymour, M Edington, JF Ward, R JM Fry (Eds) Radiation Research Vol. 2, Allen Press: Lawrence, KS. pp. 397–402

    Google Scholar 

  • Mothersill C and Seymour CB (1998) Cell–cell contact during gamma irradiation is not required to induce a bystander effect in normal human keratinocytes: evidence for release during irradiation of a signal controlling survival into the medium. Radiat Res 149: 256–262

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mothersill C, Stamato TD, Perez ML, Cummins R, Mooney R and Seymour CB (2000) Involvement of energy metabolism in the production of ‘bystander effects’ by radiation. Br J Cancer 82: 1740–1746

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nagasawa H and Little JB (1992) Induction of sister chromatid exchanges by extremely low doses of α-particles. Cancer Res 52: 6394–6396

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nagasawa H and Little JB (1999) Unexpected sensitivity to the induction of mutations by very low doses of alpha-particle radiation: evidence for a bystander effect. Radiat Res 152: 552–557

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Narayanan PK, Goodwin EH and Lehnert BE (1997) α-particles initiate biological production of superoxide anions and hydrogen peroxide in human cells. Cancer Res 57: 3963–3971

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Narayanan PK, LaRue KE, Goodwin EH and Lehnert BE (1999) Alpha particles induce the production of interleukin-8 by human cells. Radiat Res 152: 57–63

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ozols A, Prise KM, Trott K-R, Folkard M and Michael BD (2000) The role of oxidative stress and DNA damage in genomic instability: targeted microbeam studies in primary human fibroblasts. Radiat Res 153: 229–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Prise KM, Belyakov OV, Folkard M and Michael BD (1998) Studies of bystander effects in human fibroblasts using a charged particle microbeam. Int J Radiat Biol 74: 793–798

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Seymour CB and Mothersill C (1997) Delayed expression of lethal mutations and genomic instability in the progeny of human epithelial cells that survived in a bystander-killing environment. Radiat Oncol Invest 5: 106–110

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Seymour C and Mothersill C (1999) Cell communication and the “bystander effect”. Radiat Res 151: 505–506

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ward JF (2000) Non-DNA targeted effects and DNA models. In: M Moriarty, C Mothersill, C Seymour, M Edington, JF Ward, R JM Fry (Eds) Radiation Research, Allen Press: Lawrence, KS. pp. 336–341

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou H, Randers-Pehrson G, Waldren CA, Vannais D, Hall EJ and Hei TK (2000) Induction of a bystander mutagenic effect of alpha particles in mammalian cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97: 2099–2104

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Gray Laboratory Cancer Research Trust, Mount Vernon Hospital, PO Box 100, Northwood, HA6 2JR, Middlesex, UK

    O V Belyakov, A M Malcolmson, M Folkard, K M Prise & B D Michael

Authors
  1. O V Belyakov
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A M Malcolmson
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. M Folkard
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. K M Prise
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. B D Michael
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

From twelve months after its original publication, this work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Belyakov, O., Malcolmson, A., Folkard, M. et al. Direct evidence for a bystander effect of ionizing radiation in primary human fibroblasts. Br J Cancer 84, 674–679 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1054/bjoc.2000.1665

Download citation

  • Received: 19 July 2000

  • Revised: 13 November 2000

  • Accepted: 17 November 2000

  • Published: 27 February 2001

  • Issue date: 02 March 2001

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1054/bjoc.2000.1665

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • ionizing radiation
  • bystander effect
  • primary fibroblast
  • micronucleus

This article is cited by

  • The role of connexin proteins and their channels in radiation-induced atherosclerosis

    • Raghda Ramadan
    • Sarah Baatout
    • Luc Leybaert

    Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences (2021)

  • An Integrated Preprocessing Approach for Exploring Single-Cell Gene Expression in Rare Cells

    • Junyi Shang
    • David Welch
    • Qiao Lin

    Scientific Reports (2019)

  • Voxel model of individual cells and its implementation in microdosimetric calculations using GEANT4

    • Lembit Sihver
    • Jie Ni
    • Siyi Gu

    Radiation and Environmental Biophysics (2014)

  • Double-strand breaks and the concept of short- and long-term epigenetic memory

    • Christian Orlowski
    • Li-Jeen Mah
    • Tom C. Karagiannis

    Chromosoma (2011)

  • Processing of abasic DNA clusters in hApeI-silenced primary fibroblasts exposed to low doses of X-irradiation

    • Prolay Das
    • Betsy M Sutherland

    Journal of Biosciences (2011)

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Current issue
  • Collections
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Journal Information
  • Open access publishing
  • About the Editors
  • Contact
  • Special Issues
  • For Advertisers
  • Subscribe

Publish with us

  • For Authors & Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

British Journal of Cancer (Br J Cancer)

ISSN 1532-1827 (online)

ISSN 0007-0920 (print)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2025 Springer Nature Limited