Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

British Journal of Cancer
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. british journal of cancer
  3. regular article
  4. article
Randomized double-blind phase II survival study comparing immunization with the anti-idiotypic monoclonal antibody 105AD7 against placebo in advanced colorectal cancer
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Regular Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 29 May 2001

Randomized double-blind phase II survival study comparing immunization with the anti-idiotypic monoclonal antibody 105AD7 against placebo in advanced colorectal cancer

  • C A Maxwell-Armstrong1,
  • L G Durrant2,
  • T J D Buckley1,
  • J H Scholefield1,
  • R A Robins3,
  • K Fielding4,
  • J R T Monson5,
  • P Guillou6,
  • H Calvert7,
  • J Carmichael2 &
  • …
  • J D Hardcastle1 

British Journal of Cancer volume 84, pages 1443–1446 (2001)Cite this article

  • 751 Accesses

  • 40 Citations

  • 3 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

This article has been updated

Abstract

The cancer vaccine 105AD7 is an anti-idiotypic monoclonal antibody that mimics the tumour-associated antigen 791T/gp72 (CD55, Decay Accelerating Factor) on colorectal cancer cells. Phase I studies in patients with advanced disease confirmed that 105AD7 is non-toxic, and that T cell responses could be generated. A prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled survival study in patients with advanced colorectal cancer was performed. 162 patients were enrolled between April 1994 and October 1996. Patients attended at trial entry, and at 6 and 12 weeks, where they received 105AD7 or placebo. Study groups were comparable in terms of patient demographics, and time from diagnosis of advanced colorectal cancer (277.1 v 278.6 days). Baseline disease was similar, with 50% of patients having malignancy in at least 2 anatomic sites. Compliance with treatment was poor, with only 50% of patients receiving 3 planned vaccinations. Median survival from randomization date was 124 and 184 days in 105AD7 and placebo arms respectively (P=0.38), and 456 and 486 days from the date of diagnosis of advanced disease (P=0.82). 105AD7 vaccination does not prolong survival in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. The reasons for lack of efficacy are unclear, but may reflect the high tumour burden in the patient population, and poor compliance with immunization. Further vaccine studies should concentrate on patients with minimal residual disease. © 2001 Cancer Research Campaign http://www.bjcancer.com

Similar content being viewed by others

To explore the prognostic characteristics of colon cancer based on tertiary lymphoid structure-related genes and reveal the characteristics of tumor microenvironment and drug prediction

Article Open access 12 June 2024

A mitophagy-related gene signature associated with prognosis and immune microenvironment in colorectal cancer

Article Open access 04 November 2022

Co-administered antibody improves penetration of antibody–dye conjugate into human cancers with implications for antibody–drug conjugates

Article Open access 09 November 2020

Article PDF

Change history

  • 16 November 2011

    This paper was modified 12 months after initial publication to switch to Creative Commons licence terms, as noted at publication

References

  • Amin S, Robins RA, Maxwell-Armstrong CA, Galvin A, Scholefield JH and Durrant LG (2000) Vaccine induced apoptosis – A novel clinical trial end point?. Cancer Res 60: 3132–3136

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Austin EB, Robins RA and Durrant LG (1989) Human monoclonal anti-idiotypic antibody to the tumour-associated antibody 791T/36. Immunology 67: 525–530

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Buckley TJD, Robins RA and Durrant LG (1995) Clinical evidence that the human monoclonal anti-idiotypic antibody 105AD7 delays tumour growth by stimulating anti-tumor T cell responses. Hum Antibod Hybridomas 6: 68–72

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Denton GWL, Durrant LG and Hardcastle JD (1994) Clinical outcome of colorectal cancer patients treated with human monoclonal anti-idiotypic antibody. Int J Cancer 57: 10–14

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Durrant LG, Buckley TJD and Denton GWL (1994) Enhanced cell-mediated killing in patients immunized with a human monoclonal anti-idiotypic antibody 105AD7. Cancer Res 54: 4837–4840

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Durrant LG, Buckley DJ and Robins RA (2000a) 105AD7 cancer vaccine stimulates anti-tumour helper and cytotoxic T cell responses in colorectal cancer patients but repeated immunisations are required to maintain these responses. Int J Cancer 85: 87–92

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Durrant LG, Maxwell-Armstrong CA and Buckley D (2000b) A neoadjuvant clinical trial in colorectal cancer patients of the human anti-idiotypic antibody 105AD7, that mimics CD55. Clinical Cancer Research 6: 422–430

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jacob L, Somasundaram R and Smith W (1997) Cytotoxic T cell clone against rectal carcinoma induced by stimulation of a patients peripheral blood mononuclear cells with autologous cultured tumour cells. Int J Cancer 71: 325–332

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell-Armstrong CA and Durrant LG et al Robins RA et al (1999) Increased activation of lymphocytes infiltrating primary colorectal cancers following immunisation with the anti-idiotypic monoclonal antibody 105AD7. Gut 45: 593–598

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Robins RA, Denton GWL and Hardcastle JD (1991) Antitumor immune response and Interleukin-2 production induced in colorectal cancer patienta by immunisation with human monoclonal anti-idiotypic antibody. Cancer Res 51: 5425–5429

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spendlove I, Li L and Carmichael J (1999) Decay Accelerating Factor (CD55): A Target for Cancer Vaccines. Cancer Res 59: 2282–2286

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, University Hospital, Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK

    C A Maxwell-Armstrong, T J D Buckley, J H Scholefield & J D Hardcastle

  2. University Department of Clinical Oncology, City Hospital, Hucknall Road, Nottingham, UK

    L G Durrant & J Carmichael

  3. University Department of Immunology, Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK

    R A Robins

  4. Trent Institute for Health Services Research, Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK

    K Fielding

  5. Department of Surgery, Castle Hill Hospital, Cottingham, Hull, UK

    J R T Monson

  6. University Department of Surgery, St James Hospital, Leeds, UK

    P Guillou

  7. University Department of Clinical Oncology, Newcastle General Hospital, Newcastle, UK

    H Calvert

Authors
  1. C A Maxwell-Armstrong
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. L G Durrant
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. T J D Buckley
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. J H Scholefield
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. R A Robins
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. K Fielding
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. J R T Monson
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. P Guillou
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. H Calvert
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  10. J Carmichael
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  11. J D Hardcastle
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

From twelve months after its original publication, this work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Maxwell-Armstrong, C., Durrant, L., Buckley, T. et al. Randomized double-blind phase II survival study comparing immunization with the anti-idiotypic monoclonal antibody 105AD7 against placebo in advanced colorectal cancer. Br J Cancer 84, 1443–1446 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1054/bjoc.2001.1725

Download citation

  • Received: 16 August 2000

  • Revised: 14 December 2000

  • Accepted: 22 January 2001

  • Published: 29 May 2001

  • Issue date: 01 June 2001

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1054/bjoc.2001.1725

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • anti-idiotypic antibody
  • colorectal cancer
  • immunotherapy
  • 105AD7

This article is cited by

  • Cancer vaccines as a therapeutic modality: the long trek

    • A. G. Dalgleish
    • M. A. Whelan

    Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy (2006)

  • Immune responses to the 105AD7 human anti-idiotypic vaccine after intensive chemotherapy, for osteosarcoma

    • K Pritchard-Jones
    • I Spendlove
    • L G Durrant

    British Journal of Cancer (2005)

  • Immune responses in advanced colorectal cancer following repeated intradermal vaccination with the anti-CEA murine monoclonal antibody, PR1A3: results of a phase I study

    • A. P. Zbar
    • H. Thomas
    • W. F. Bodmer

    International Journal of Colorectal Disease (2005)

  • Decay accelerating factor and colorectal cancer

    • Xue-qin Gao
    • Yan-qin Lu
    • Jin-xiang Han

    Chinese Journal of Cancer Research (2004)

  • The Inhibitory Effect of CD46, CD55, and CD59 on Complement Activation After Immunotherapeutic Treatment of Cervical Carcinoma Cells with Monoclonal Antibodies or Bispecific Monoclonal Antibodies

    • Kyra A Gelderman
    • Vanessa T Blok
    • Arko Gorter

    Laboratory Investigation (2002)

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Current issue
  • Collections
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Journal Information
  • Open access publishing
  • About the Editors
  • Contact
  • Special Issues
  • For Advertisers
  • Subscribe

Publish with us

  • For Authors & Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

British Journal of Cancer (Br J Cancer)

ISSN 1532-1827 (online)

ISSN 0007-0920 (print)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2025 Springer Nature Limited