Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

British Journal of Cancer
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. british journal of cancer
  3. regular article
  4. article
Clinical relevance of single item quality of life indicators in cancer clinical trials
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Regular Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 01 May 2001

Clinical relevance of single item quality of life indicators in cancer clinical trials

  • J Bernhard1,
  • M Sullivan2,
  • C Hürny3,
  • A S Coates4 &
  • …
  • C-M Rudenstam5 

British Journal of Cancer volume 84, pages 1156–1165 (2001)Cite this article

  • 1404 Accesses

  • 85 Citations

  • 3 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

This article has been updated

Abstract

We investigated the hypothesis that global single-item quality-of-life indicators are less precise for specific treatment effects (discriminant validity) than multi-item scales but similarly efficient for overall treatment comparisons and changes over time (responsiveness) because they reflect the summation of the individual meaning and importance of various factors. Linear analogue self-assessment (LASA) indicators for physical well-being, mood and coping were compared with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HAD), the Mood Adjective Check List (MACL) and the emotional behaviour and social interaction scales of the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP) in 84 patients with early breast cancer receiving adjuvant therapy. Discriminant validity was investigated by multitrait-multimethod correlation, responsiveness by standardized response mean (SRM). Discriminant validity of the indicators was present at baseline but less under treatment. Responsiveness was demonstrated by the expected pattern among treatments (P = 0.008). In patients without chemotherapy, the SRMs indicated moderate (0.5–0.8) to large (>0.8) improvements in physical well-being (0.70), coping (0.92), HAD anxiety (0.89) and depression (1.19), and MACL mental well-being (0.68). In patients with chemotherapy for the first 3 months, small but clinically significant improvements (>).2) included mood (0.38), coping (0.41), HAD axiety (0.31) and MACL mental well-being (0.35). Patients with 6 months chemotherapy showed no changes. The indicators also reflected mood disorders (HAD) and marked psychosocial dysfunction (SIP) at baseline and under treatment according to pre-defined cut-off levels. Global indicators were confirmed to be efficient for evaluating treatments overall and changes over time. The lower reliability of single as opposed to multi-item scales affects primarily their discriminant validity. This is less decisive in large sample sizes. © 2001 Cancer Research Campaign http://www.bjcancer.com

Similar content being viewed by others

Feasibility of online managing cancer and living meaningfully (CALM) in Chinese patients with metastatic breast cancer: a pilot randomized control trial

Article Open access 28 February 2024

A risk stratification model to predict chemotherapy benefit in medullary carcinoma of the breast: a population-based SEER database

Article Open access 03 July 2023

Mitigating long-term and delayed adverse events associated with cancer treatment: implications for survivorship

Article 25 May 2023

Article PDF

Change history

  • 16 November 2011

    This paper was modified 12 months after initial publication to switch to Creative Commons licence terms, as noted at publication

References

  • Ahlmén EM, Bengtsson CB, Sullivan BM and Bjelle A (1990) A comparison of overall health between patients with rheumatoid arthritis and a population with and without rheumatoid arthritis. Scand J Rheumatol 19: 413–421

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Augustinsson LE, Sullivan L and Sullivan M (1989) Chronic pain in functional neurosurgery: Function and mood in various diagnostic groups with reference to epidural spinal electrical stimulation. Schmerz/Pain/Douleur 10: 30–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergner M, Bobbit RA, Carter WB and Gilson BS (1981) The Sickness Impact Profile: development and final revision of a health status measure. Med Care 19: 787–805

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bernhard J, Hürny C, Coates AS, Peterson HF, Castiglione Gertsch M, Gelber RD, Goldhirsch A, Senn HJ and Rudenstam CM (1997) Quality of life assessment in patients receiving adjuvant therapy for breast cancer: the IBCSG approach. The International Breast Cancer Study Group. Ann Oncol 8: 825–835

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bernhard J, Castiglione Gertsch M, Schmitz SF, Thürlimann B, Cavalli F, Morant R, Fey MF, Bonnefoi H, Goldhirsch A and Hürny C (1999a) Quality of life in postmenopausal patients with breast cancer after failure of tamoxifen: formestane versus megestrol acetate as second-line hormonal treatment. Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (Sakk). Eur J Cancer 35: 913–920

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bernhard J, Thürlimann B, Schmitz SF, Castiglione Gertsch M, Cavalli F, Morant R, Fey MF, Bonnefoi H, Goldhirsch A and Hürny C (1999b) Defining clinical benefit in postmenopausal patients with breast cancer under second-line endocrine treatment: does quality of life matter? J Clin Oncol 17: 1672–1679

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Butow P, Coates A, Dunn S, Bernhard J and Hürny C (1991) On the receiving end IV: Validation of quality of life indicators. Ann Oncol 2: 597–603

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Coates A, Gebski V, Bishop JF, Jeal PN, Woods RL and Snyder R (1987) Improving the quality of life during chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer. A comparison of intermittent and continuous treatment strategies. N Engl J Med 317: 1490–1495

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Coates A, Glasziou P and McNeil D (1990) On the receiving end – III. Measurement of quality of life during cancer chemotherapy. Ann Oncol 1: 213–217

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Coates A, Gebski V, Signorini D, Murray P and McNeil D (1992) Prognostic value of quality-of-life scores during chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 10: 1833–1838

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Coates A, Thomson D, McLeod GR, Hersey P, Gill PG, Olver IN, Kefford R, Lowenthal RM Beadle G and Walpole E (1993) Prognostic value of quality of life scores in a trial of chemotherapy with or without interferon in patients with metastatic malignant melanoma. Eur J Cancer 29A: 1731–1734

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen J (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, Academic Press: New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunny KA and Perri M (1991) Single-item vs multiple-item measures of health-related quality of life. Psychological Reports 69: 127–130

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fallowfield LJ, Hall A and Maguire GP MB (1990) Psychological outcomes of different treatment policies in women with early breast cancer outside a clinical trial. Br Med J 301: 575–580

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hall A, A'Hern R and Fallowfield L (1999) Are we using appropriate self-report questionnaires for detecting anxiety and depression in women with early breast cancer? Eur J Cancer 35: 79–85

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hürny C, Bernhard J, Gelber RD, Coates A, Castiglione M, Isley M, Dreher D, Peterson H, Goldhirsch A and Senn HJ (1992) Quality of life measures for patients receiving adjuvant therapy for breast cancer: an international trial. The International Breast Cancer Study Group. Eur J Cancer 28: 118–124

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hürny C, Bernhard J, Bacchi M, van Wegberg B, Tomamichel M, Spek U, Coates A, Castiglione M and Goldhirsch A (1993) The Perceived Adjustment to Chronic Illness Scale (PACIS): a global indicator of coping for operable breast cancer patients in clinical trials. Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK) and the International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG). Support Care Cancer 1: 200–208

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hürny C, Bernhard J, Coates A, Peterson HF, Castiglione-Gertsch M, Gelber RD, Rudenstam CM, Collins J, Lindtner J, Goldhirsch A and Senn HJ (1996a) Responsiveness of a single-item indicator versus a multi-item scale: assessment of emotional well-being in an international adjuvant breast cancer trial. Med Care 34: 234–248

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hürny C, Bernhard J, Coates AS, Castiglione Gertsch M, Peterson HF, Gelber RD, Forbes JF, Rudenstam CM, Simoncini E, Crivellari D, Goldhirsch A and Senn HJ (1996b) Impact of adjuvant therapy on quality of life in women with node-positive operable breast cancer. International Breast Cancer Study Group. Lancet 347: 1279–1284

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Katz JN, Larson MG, Phillips CB, Fossel AH and Liang MH (1992) Comparative measurement sensitivity of short and longer health status instruments. Med Care 30: 917–925

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Liang MH, Fossel AH and Larson MG (1990) Comparisons of five health status instruments for orthopedic evaluation. Med Care 28: 632–642

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Manne SL, Sabbioni M, Bovbjerg DH, Jacobsen PB, Taylor KL and Redd WH (1994) Coping with chemotherapy for breast cancer. J Behav Med 17: 41–55

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maraste R, Brandt L, Olsson H and Ryde Brandt B (1992) Anxiety and depression in breast cancer patients at start of adjuvant radiotherapy. Relations to age and type of surgery. Acta Oncol 31: 641–643

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maunsell E, Brisson J and Deschênes L (1992) Psychological distress after initial treatment of breast cancer. Cancer 70: 120–125

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maunsell E, Brisson J, Deschenes L and Frasure Smith N (1996) Randomized trial of a psychologic distress screening program after breast cancer: effects on quality of life. J Clin Oncol 14: 2747–2755

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McCormack HM de L Horne DJ and Sheather S (1988) Clinical applications of visual analogue scales: a critical review. Psych Med 18: 1007–1019

    Google Scholar 

  • McHorney CA, Ware JE and Rogers WH (1992) The validity and relative precision of MOS Short- and Long-Form Health Status Scales and Dartmouth COOP charts: Results from the medical outcomes study. Med Care 30: MS253–MS265

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Priestman TJ and Baum M (1976) Evaluation of quality of life in patients receiving treatment for advanced breast cancer. Lancet i: 899–900

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjöberg L, Svensson E and Persson LO (1979) The measurement of mood. Scand J Psychol 20: 1–18

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan BM, Ahlmén M, Archenholtz B and Svensson G (1986) Measuring health in rheumatic disorders by means of a Swedish version of the sickness impact profile. Scand J Rheumatol 15: 193–200

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan M, Karlsson J, Sjöström L, Backman L, Bengtsson C, Bouchard C, Dahlgren S, Jonsson E, Larsson B, Lindstedt S, Näslund I, Olbe L and Wedel H (1993) Swedish obese subjects (SOS) – an intervention study of obesity. Baseline evaluation of health and psychosocial functioning in the first 1743 subjects examined. Int J Obes 17: 503–512

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ware JE, Snow KK, Kosinski M and Gandek B (1993). SF-36 Health Survey. Manual and interpretation guide, The Health Institute, New England Medical Center: Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson D and Pennebaker JW (1989) Health complaints, stress, and distress: Exploring the central role of negative affectivity. Psychol Rev 96: 234–254

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Watson M, Greer S, Rowden L, Gorman C, Robertson B, Bliss JM and Tunmore R (1991) Relationships between emotional control, adjustment to cancer and depression and anxiety in breast cancer patients. Psychol Med 21: 51–57

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zerssen Dv (1986) Clinical self-rating scales (CSRS) of the Munich Psychiatric Information System (PSYCHIS München). Assessment of depression, Sartorius N, Ban TA (eds). 270–303, Springer: Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Zigmond AS and Snaith RP (1983) The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Acta Psychiatrica Scand 67: 362–370

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. IBCSG Coordinating Center, Effingerstr. 40, Bern, CH-3008, Switzerland

    J Bernhard

  2. Health Care Research Unit, Institute of Internal Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg, SE 413 45, Sweden

    M Sullivan

  3. Geriatrics, Bürgerspital, Rorschacher Strasse 94, St. Gallen, 9000, Switzerland

    C Hürny

  4. Australian Cancer Society and University of Sydney, Sydney, GPO Box 4708, NSW, 2001, Australia

    A S Coates

  5. Department of Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg, SE 413 45, Sweden

    C-M Rudenstam

Authors
  1. J Bernhard
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M Sullivan
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. C Hürny
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. A S Coates
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. C-M Rudenstam
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

From twelve months after its original publication, this work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bernhard, J., Sullivan, M., Hürny, C. et al. Clinical relevance of single item quality of life indicators in cancer clinical trials. Br J Cancer 84, 1156–1165 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1054/bjoc.2001.1785

Download citation

  • Received: 14 August 2000

  • Revised: 19 January 2001

  • Accepted: 09 February 2001

  • Published: 01 May 2001

  • Issue date: 04 May 2001

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1054/bjoc.2001.1785

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • breast cancer
  • quality of life
  • scale comparison
  • responsiveness
  • global indicators
  • randomized controlled trials

This article is cited by

  • Effects of financial empowerment and self-confidence in financial empowerment on financial well-being

    • Su-Jung Nam

    Current Psychology (2023)

  • Quality of life of patients with rare cancer: a comparison with patients with colorectal cancer and the association with disease trajectory-related factors

    • Esmee Driehuis
    • Eline de Heus
    • Saskia F. A. Duijts

    Journal of Cancer Survivorship (2023)

  • Treatment-induced symptoms, depression and age as predictors of sexual problems in premenopausal women with early breast cancer receiving adjuvant endocrine therapy

    • Karin Ribi
    • Weixiu Luo
    • Jürg Bernhard

    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment (2020)

  • Quality of life under extended continuous versus intermittent adjuvant letrozole in lymph node-positive, early breast cancer patients: the SOLE randomised phase 3 trial

    • Karin Ribi
    • Weixiu Luo
    • Jürg Bernhard

    British Journal of Cancer (2019)

  • When do patient reported quality of life indicators become prognostic in breast cancer?

    • Chee Khoon Lee
    • Malcolm Hudson
    • Alan S. Coates

    Health and Quality of Life Outcomes (2018)

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Current issue
  • Collections
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Journal Information
  • Open access publishing
  • About the Editors
  • Contact
  • Special Issues
  • For Advertisers
  • Subscribe

Publish with us

  • For Authors & Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

British Journal of Cancer (Br J Cancer)

ISSN 1532-1827 (online)

ISSN 0007-0920 (print)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2025 Springer Nature Limited