Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

British Journal of Cancer
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. british journal of cancer
  3. regular article
  4. article
Accelerated cisplatin and high-dose epirubicin with G-CSF support in patients with relapsed non-small-cell lung cancer: feasibility and efficacy
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Regular Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 13 November 2001

Accelerated cisplatin and high-dose epirubicin with G-CSF support in patients with relapsed non-small-cell lung cancer: feasibility and efficacy

  • C Huisman1,3,
  • B Biesma2,
  • P E Postmus1,
  • G Giaccone3,
  • F M N H Schramel4 &
  • …
  • E F Smit1 

British Journal of Cancer volume 85, pages 1456–1461 (2001)Cite this article

  • 782 Accesses

  • 16 Citations

  • Metrics details

This article has been updated

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to determine whether it is feasible to administer high-dose epirubicin (135 mg m–2) combined with a fixed dose of cisplatin every 2 weeks with G-CSF support in patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Subsequently, the efficacy of the recommended dose of this regimen was tested in a phase II study in patients with relapsed NSCLC. In the initial feasibility study at least 6 patients were entered at each of the 4 dose levels tested. A fixed dose of cisplatin 60 mg m–2was given. Epirubicin was administered at 120 mg m–2on dose level 1, 135 mg m–2on dose level 2 and 3 and 135 mg m–2on dose level 4. Patients treated at dose level 3 and 4 received G-CSF support on days 3–12. Cycles were repeated every 3 weeks on the first 3 dose levels and every 2 weeks on the fourth dose level. A total of 27 patients were then treated on dose level 4, which appeared to be feasible in the initial study. In the initial study, a total of 86 courses were administered. Haematological toxicity was the principal side effect. None of the patients encountered dose-limiting toxicity in the first course, which confirmed that epirubicin 135 mg m–2could be combined with cisplatin 60 mg m–2and accelerated by G-CSF support to a 14-day-schedule. In the subsequent phase II study with this schedule, 89 courses were administered. The relative dose intensity of cisplatin and epirubicin was 0.90 and 0.91, respectively. Myelosuppression was frequent with 70% and 63% of patients experiencing WHO grade III or IV leukocytopenia and thrombocytopenia, respectively. 6 cases of febrile neutropenia were observed, with 2 treatment-related deaths. Non-haematological toxicity consisted mainly of nausea and vomiting, which was grade III in 22% of patients. Renal toxicity grade I and II occurred in 37% and 4% of patients, respectively. 55% of these patients had received prior cisplatin-containing chemotherapy. On an intention-to-treat basis 9 partial responses were recorded in 27 patients (33%; 95% confidence interval, 15%–51%). Accelerated cisplatin and high-dose epirubicin with G-CSF support is a feasible and promising regimen in relapsed NSCLC. Myelosuppression limits the use of this regimen in the second-line setting to a selected group of patients with a good performance status. Since the activity of this regimen is encouraging, it is probably best studied in untreated patients. © 2001 Cancer Research Campaign http://www.bjcancer.com

Similar content being viewed by others

A pivotal bridging study of lurbinectedin as second-line therapy in Chinese patients with small cell lung cancer

Article Open access 13 February 2024

Erlotinib versus gemcitabine plus cisplatin as neoadjuvant treatment of stage IIIA-N2 EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer: final overall survival analysis of the EMERGING-CTONG 1103 randomised phase II trial

Article Open access 24 February 2023

Caspase 3/GSDME-dependent pyroptosis contributes to chemotherapy drug-induced nephrotoxicity

Article Open access 15 February 2021

Article PDF

Change history

  • 16 November 2011

    This paper was modified 12 months after initial publication to switch to Creative Commons licence terms, as noted at publication

References

  • ASCO (1997) Clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of unresectable non-small cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 15: 2996–3018

  • Crinò L, Scagliotti G and Marangolo M et al (1997) Cisplatin-gemcitabine combination in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a phase II study. J Clin Oncol 15: 297–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feld R, Wierzbicki R and Walde PLD et al (1992) Phase I-II study of high-dose epirubicin in advanced non-small cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 10: 297–303

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fossella FV, DeVore R and Kerr Ret al (2000) Randomized phase III trial of docetaxel versus vinorelbine or ifosfamide in patients with non-small cell lung cancer previously treated with platinum-containing chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 18: 2354–2362

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fountzilas G, Skarlos D and Giannakakis T et al (1994) Intensive chemotherapy with high-dose epirubicin every 2 weeks and prophylactic administration of filgastrim in advanced breast cancer. Eur J Cancer 30: 965–969

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gridelli C, Airoma G and Incoronato P et al (1992) Mitomycin C plus vindesine or cisplatin plus epirubicin in previously treated patients with symptomatic advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 30: 212–214

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huisman C, Smit EF, Giaccone G and Postmus PE (2000) Second-line chemotherapy in relapsing or refractory non-small cell lung cancer patients – a review. J Clin Oncol 18: 3722–3730

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Joss RA, Hansen HH and Hansen M et al (1984) Phase II clinical trial of epirubicin in advanced squamous, adeno-and large cell carcinoma of the lung. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol 20: 495–499

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kalman LA, Kris MG and Gralla RJ et al (1983) Phase II trial of 4’-epidoxorubicin in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Treat Rep 67: 591–592

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lalisang RI, Voest EE and Wils JA et al (2000) Dose-dense epirubicin and paclitaxel with G-CSF: a study of decreasing intervals in metastatic breast cancer. Br J Cancer 82: 1914–1919

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lelli G, Farris A and Casadio M et al (1986) 4’-epidoxorubicin and cisdiamminedichloroplatinum in advanced non-small cell bronchogenic carcinoma: a phase II study. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 5: 185–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Martoni A, Giovanni M and Tomasi L (1984) A phase II clinical trial of 4’-epidoxorubicin in advanced solid tumours. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 12: 179–182

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Martoni A, Melotti B and Guaraldi M et al (1991) Activity of high-dose epirubicin in advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Eur J Cancer 27: 1231–1234

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Martoni A, Guaraldi M and Casadio L et al (1992) A phase II study of high-dose epirubicin plus cisplatinum in advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Ann Oncol 3: 864–866

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Martoni A, Guaraldi M and Piana E et al (1998) Multicenter randomized clinical trial on high-dose epirubicin plus cisplatinum versus vinorelbine plus cisplatinum in advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer 22: 31–38

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Meyers FJ, Cardiff RD and Quadro R et al (1986) Epirubicin in non-oat cell lung cancer-response rates and the importance of immunopathology: a northern California oncology group study. Cancer Treat Rep, (1986). 70: 805–806

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Non-small cell lung cancer collaborative group (1995) Chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis using updated data on individual patients from 52 randomized trials. BMJ 311: 899–909

  • Rossel R, Gómez-Codina J and Anton A et al (1994) Escalating high-dose epirubicin plus cisplatin in small cell lung cancer with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor use when appropriate. Semin Onc 21, (Suppl 1):48–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd FA, Dancey J and Ramlau R et al (2000) Prospective randomized trial of docetaxel versus best supportive care in patients with non-small cell lung cancer previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 18: 2095–2103

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smit EF, Berendsen HH and Piers DA et al (1992) A phase II study of high dose epirubicin in unresectable non small cell lung cancer. Br J Cancer 65: 405–408

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wils J, Utama I and Sala L et al (1990) Phase II study of high dose epirubicin in non-small cell lung cancer. Eur J Cancer 26: 1140–1141

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Pulmonary Diseases, University Hospital Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    C Huisman, P E Postmus & E F Smit

  2. Department of Pulmonary Diseases, Bosch Medisch Centrum, Den Bosch, The Netherlands

    B Biesma

  3. Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    C Huisman & G Giaccone

  4. Department of Pulmonary Diseases, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands

    F M N H Schramel

Authors
  1. C Huisman
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. B Biesma
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. P E Postmus
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. G Giaccone
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. F M N H Schramel
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. E F Smit
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

From twelve months after its original publication, this work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Huisman, C., Biesma, B., Postmus, P. et al. Accelerated cisplatin and high-dose epirubicin with G-CSF support in patients with relapsed non-small-cell lung cancer: feasibility and efficacy. Br J Cancer 85, 1456–1461 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1054/bjoc.2001.2013

Download citation

  • Received: 09 March 2001

  • Revised: 03 June 2001

  • Accepted: 05 July 2001

  • Published: 13 November 2001

  • Issue date: 16 November 2001

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1054/bjoc.2001.2013

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • non-small-cell lung cancer
  • chemotherapy
  • second-line
  • cisplatin
  • epirubicin

This article is cited by

  • Multiple cycles of PBPC-supported high-dose carboplatin and paclitaxel following mobilization with epirubicin and cisplatin are feasible but ineffective in treating patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

    • U De Giorgi
    • G Rosti
    • M Marangolo

    Bone Marrow Transplantation (2007)

  • Multicenter phase II trial of accelerated cisplatin and high-dose epirubicin followed by surgery or radiotherapy in patients with stage IIIa non-small-cell lung cancer with mediastinal lymph node involvement (N2-disease)

    • E C J Phernambucq
    • B Biesma
    • P E Postmus

    British Journal of Cancer (2006)

  • Second-line treatment with irinotecan plus cisplatin vs cisplatin of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer pretreated with taxanes and gemcitabine: a multicenter randomised phase II study

    • V Georgoulias
    • A Agelidou
    • D Mavroudis

    British Journal of Cancer (2005)

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Current issue
  • Collections
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Journal Information
  • Open access publishing
  • About the Editors
  • Contact
  • Special Issues
  • For Advertisers
  • Subscribe

Publish with us

  • For Authors & Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

British Journal of Cancer (Br J Cancer)

ISSN 1532-1827 (online)

ISSN 0007-0920 (print)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2025 Springer Nature Limited