Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

British Journal of Cancer
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. british journal of cancer
  3. regular article
  4. article
Routine breast screening for women aged 65–69: results from evaluation of the demonstration sites
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Regular Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 30 October 2001

Routine breast screening for women aged 65–69: results from evaluation of the demonstration sites

  • S M Moss1,
  • J Brown2,
  • L Garvican3,
  • D A Coleman1,
  • L E Johns1,
  • R G Blanks1,
  • G Rubin4,
  • J Oswald4,
  • A Page4,
  • A Evans5,
  • R Wilson5,
  • L Lee5,
  • J Liston6,
  • L Sturdy6,
  • G Sutton7,
  • G Wardman8,
  • J Patnick9 &
  • …
  • R Winder9 

British Journal of Cancer volume 85, pages 1289–1294 (2001)Cite this article

  • 954 Accesses

  • 9 Citations

  • Metrics details

This article has been updated

Abstract

Routine programme data and specially designed surveys from 3 demonstration sites were analysed to determine the implications of extending the NHS Breast Screening Programme (NHSBSP), to include routine invitations for women up to 69 years. All women aged 65–69 and registered with GPs in these areas received routine invitations for breast screening along with those aged 50–64. Overall uptake was 71% in women aged 65–69 compared with 78% in younger women, but was ≥ 90% in both groups who had previously attended within 5 years. Recall rates were lower for older women, but with a higher positive predictive value for cancer. The percentages of invasive cancer in different prognostic categories were similar in the 2 age groups. Older women took no longer to screen than younger women. The costs per woman invited or per woman screened were also similar to those for women aged 50–64, whilst the cost per cancer detected was some 34% lower in older women. Breast screening is as cost effective for women aged 65–69 as for those aged 50–64, with a higher cancer detection rate balancing shorter life expectancy. The proposed extension to the national programme will have considerable workforce implications for the NHSBSP and require additional resources. © 2001 Cancer Research Campaign http://www.bjcancer.com

Similar content being viewed by others

A case-control study to evaluate the impact of the breast screening programme on mortality in England

Article Open access 23 November 2020

Benefits and harms of annual, biennial, or triennial breast cancer mammography screening for women at average risk of breast cancer: a systematic review for the European Commission Initiative on Breast Cancer (ECIBC)

Article Open access 26 November 2021

Forecast of a future leveling of the incidence trends of female breast cancer in Taiwan: an age-period-cohort analysis

Article Open access 21 July 2022

Article PDF

Change history

  • 16 November 2011

    This paper was modified 12 months after initial publication to switch to Creative Commons licence terms, as noted at publication

References

  • Chen HH, Tabar L, Fagerberg G and Duffy SW (1995) Effect of breast cancer screening after age 65. J Med Screening 2: 10–14

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Department of Health The NHS Cancer Plan. A plan for investment. A plan for reform. 1–98 (2000). London

  • Forrest APM (1986). Breast cancer screening: report to the health ministers of England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland, London: HMSO

    Google Scholar 

  • Fracheboud J, de Koning HJ, Beemsterboer PM, Boer R, Hendriks JH, Verbeek AL, van Ineveld BM, de Bruyn AE and van der Maas P (1998) Nation-wide breast cancer screening in the Netherlands: results of initial and subsequent screening 1990–1995. Int J Cancer 75: 694–698

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Galea MH, Blamey RW, Elston CE and Ellis IO (1992) The Nottingham Prognostic Index in primary breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 22: 207–219

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hendry PJ and Entwhistle C (1996) Effect of issuing an invitation for breast cancer screening to women aged 65 to 69. J Med Screening 3: 88–89

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs P, Kay C, Friedman EH, St Leger AS, Lambert C, Boggis CR, Howard TM, Owen AW and Asbury DL (1990) Response by women aged 65–79 to invitation for screening for breast cancer by mammography: a pilot study. BJM 301: 1314–1316

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Horton-Taylor D, McPherson K, Parbhoo S and Perry N (1996) Response of women aged 65–74 to invitation for screening for breast cancer by mammography: a pilot study in London, U.K. J Epidemiol Community Health 50: 77–80

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston K, Gerard K, Morton A and Brown J (1996) NHS costs for the Breast Screening Frequency and Age Trials. HERG Discussion Paper November No 16,

  • Johnston K, Gerard K and Brown J (1998) Analyzing center selection bias in a breast screening trial. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 14: 494–504

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • National Evaluation Team for Breast Cancer Screening Llandelijke evaluatie van bevolkingsonderzoek naar borstkanker in Nederland. 2000. Rotterdam, Erasmus University, Catholic University, Nijmegen.

  • NHS Executive (1997) Health Service Cost Index (HCHS Specific Price Inflation). Leeds: Department of Health

  • Rubin G, Garvican L and Moss S (1998) Routine invitation of women aged 65–69 for breast cancer screening: results of the first year at the East Sussex Brighton & Hove Screening Service pilot site. BMJ 317: 388–389

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro S, Coleman EA, Broeders M, Codd M, de Koning H, Fracheboud J, Moss S, Paci E, Stachenko S and Ballard-Barbash R (1998) For the International Breast Cancer Screening Network (IBSN) and the European Network of Pilot Projects for Breast Cancer Screening. Breast cancer screening programmes in 22 countries: current policies, administration and guidelines. Int J Epidemiol 27: 735–742

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • van Dijck JAAM, Verbeek AL, Hendricks JHCL, Holland R and Mravunac M (1996) Mammographic screening after the age of 65 years: early outcomes in the Nijmegen programme. Br J Cancer 74: 1838–1842

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Cancer Screening Evaluation Unit, Section of Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, Block D, Cotswold Road, Sutton, SM2 5NG, Surrey

    S M Moss, D A Coleman, L E Johns & R G Blanks

  2. Department of Social Medicine, MRC HSRC, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, Whiteladies Road, Bristol, BS8 2PR

    J Brown

  3. Honorary Research Fellow, Centre for Health Service Studies at Tunbridge Wells, University of Kent, Oak Lodge, David Salomon's Estate, Broomehill Road, Tonbridge Wells, TN3 0TG, Kent, East Sussex

    L Garvican

  4. Brighton and Hove Breast Screening Service,

    G Rubin, J Oswald & A Page

  5. Helen Garrod Breast Screening Unit, City Hospital, Nottingham

    A Evans, R Wilson & L Lee

  6. Leeds and Wakefield Breast Screening Service,

    J Liston & L Sturdy

  7. Wakefield Health Authority,

    G Sutton

  8. Calderdale and Kirklees Health Authority,

    G Wardman

  9. NHS Breast Screening Programme,

    J Patnick & R Winder

Authors
  1. S M Moss
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. J Brown
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. L Garvican
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. D A Coleman
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. L E Johns
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. R G Blanks
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. G Rubin
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. J Oswald
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. A Page
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  10. A Evans
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  11. R Wilson
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  12. L Lee
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  13. J Liston
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  14. L Sturdy
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  15. G Sutton
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  16. G Wardman
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  17. J Patnick
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  18. R Winder
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

From twelve months after its original publication, this work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Moss, S., Brown, J., Garvican, L. et al. Routine breast screening for women aged 65–69: results from evaluation of the demonstration sites. Br J Cancer 85, 1289–1294 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1054/bjoc.2001.2047

Download citation

  • Received: 02 May 2001

  • Revised: 17 July 2001

  • Accepted: 17 July 2001

  • Published: 30 October 2001

  • Issue date: 02 November 2001

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1054/bjoc.2001.2047

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • breast cancer
  • screening
  • older women

This article is cited by

  • Evaluation of extension of breast screening to women aged 65–70 in England using screening performance measures

    • R L Bennett
    • R G Blanks
    • S M Moss

    British Journal of Cancer (2009)

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Current issue
  • Collections
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Journal Information
  • Open access publishing
  • About the Editors
  • Contact
  • Special Issues
  • For Advertisers
  • Subscribe

Publish with us

  • For Authors & Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

British Journal of Cancer (Br J Cancer)

ISSN 1532-1827 (online)

ISSN 0007-0920 (print)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2025 Springer Nature Limited