Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

British Journal of Cancer
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. british journal of cancer
  3. regular article
  4. article
Validating automated screening for psychological distress by means of computer touchscreens for use in routine oncology practice
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Regular Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 11 December 2001

Validating automated screening for psychological distress by means of computer touchscreens for use in routine oncology practice

  • A Cull1,
  • A Gould2,
  • A House3,
  • A Smith4,
  • V Strong1,
  • G Velikova4,
  • P Wright4 &
  • …
  • P Selby4 

British Journal of Cancer volume 85, pages 1842–1849 (2001)Cite this article

  • 1200 Accesses

  • 71 Citations

  • 6 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

This article has been updated

Abstract

The aim of the study was to confirm the validity of using touchscreen computers for screening for clinically significant levels of distress among cancer patients in routine oncology practice. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), EORTC Quality of Life questionnaire (QLQ-C30), Mental Health Inventory-MHI5 and a Concerns Checklist were administered via touchscreen computer to 172 chemotherapy out-patients, twice, 2–4 weeks apart. A standard psychiatric interview (Present State Examination – PSE) was conducted within a week of the second assessment. On interview, 23% of patients were identified as ‘cases’. Using the available data (questionnaires, sociodemographic details, self-reported past psychiatric history), the best screening strategy combined scores from MHI-5 and HADS from a single time-point with the following rules: if MHI-5 < 11 = non-case; if MHI-5 ≥ 11 then use HADS; then, if HADS ≥ 9 = ‘case’ (sensitivity 85%; specificity 71%; misclassification rate 26%; positive predictive value 47%). The computerized screening system enabled data to be collected, scored, collated and reported in real time to identify patients who warrant further clinical assessment. It offers the potential for improving ‘case’ detection in routine oncology practice while reducing the burden of questions put to ‘non-cases’. Further work is needed to develop optimal choice of screening questions for this purpose. © 2001 Cancer Research Campaign http://www.bjcancer.com

Similar content being viewed by others

A feasibility study of distress screening with psychometric evaluation and referral of cancer patients

Article Open access 26 March 2025

Patients' preferences in therapeutic decision-making in digestive oncology: a single centre cross-sectional observational study

Article Open access 26 May 2023

Interactive exploration of a global clinical network from a large breast cancer cohort

Article Open access 10 August 2022

Article PDF

Change history

  • 16 November 2011

    This paper was modified 12 months after initial publication to switch to Creative Commons licence terms, as noted at publication

References

  • Aapro M and Cull A (1999) Depression in breast cancer patients: the need for treatment. Annal Oncol 10: 627–636

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S and Bergman B (1993) The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC): A quality of life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst 85: 365–376

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Armitage P (1971) Statistical Methods in Medical Research. Blackwell: Oxford

  • Berard RMF, Boer Meester F and Viljoen G (1998) Depressive disorders in an outpatient oncology Setting: Prevalence Assessment and Management. PsychoOncology 7: 112, 120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berwick DM, Murphy JM and Goldman PA (1991) Performance of a five item mental health screening test. Medical Care 29: 169–176

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carstairs V and Morris R (1991) Deprivation and Health in Scotland. Aberdeen University Press: Aberdeen

  • Chochinov HM, Wilson KG and Enns M (1997) Are you depressed? Screening for depression in the terminally ill. Am J Psychiatry 154: 674–676

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cull A, Stewart M and Altman DG (1995) Assessment of and Intervention for Psychosocial Problems in Routine Oncology Practice. Brit J Cancer 72: 229–235

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Detmar SB and Aaronson NK (1998) Quality of Life Assessment in Daily Clinical Oncology Practice: A feasibility study. Eur J Cancer 34(8): 1181–1186

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fallowfield L, Lipkin M and Hall A (1998) Helping senior oncologists communication skills: Results from Phase 1 of a Comprehensive Longitudinal Program in the United Kingdom. J Clin Oncol 16: 1961–1968

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fallowfield L, Ratcliffe D and Jenkins V (2001) Psychiatric morbidity and its recognition by doctors in patients with cancer. Brit J Cancer 84: 1011–1015

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbody SM, House AO and Sheldon TA (2001) Routinely administered questionnaires for depression and anxiety: systematic review. Brit Med J 322: 406–409

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hall A, A’Hern R and Fallowfield L (1999) Are we using appropriate self report questionnaires for detecting anxiety and depression in women with early breast cancer. Eur J Cancer 35: 79–85

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harrell FE, Margolis PA and Gove S (1998) Development of a clinical prediction model for ordinal outcomes. Statistics in Medicine 17: 909–944

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrell FE (2000). Regression Modeling Strategies with Applications to Survival Analysis, and Logistic Regression, Springer-Verlag: New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison J, Maguire P and Ibbotson T (1994) Concerns cofiding and psychiatric disorder in newly diagnosed cancer patients: A descriptive study. PsychoOncology 3: 173–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopwood P, Howell A and Maguire P (1991a) Psychiatric morbidity in patients with advanced cancer of the breast: prevalence by two self rating questionnaires. Brit J Cancer 64: 349–352

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hopwood P, Howell A and Maguire P (1991b) Screening for psychiatric morbidity in patients with advanced breast cancer: validation of two self report questionnaires. Brit J Cancer 64: 353–356

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ibbotson T, Maguire P and Selby P (1994) Screening for Anxiety and Depression in Cancer Patients: The effects of disease and treatment. Eur J Cancer 30A: 37–40

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maguire P (1985) Psychological morbidity associated with cancer and cancer treatment. Clin Oncol 4: 559–575

    Google Scholar 

  • Maguire P, Faulkner A and Booth K (1996) Helping cancer patients disclose their concerns. Eur J Cancer 32A: 78–81

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McCullagh P and Nelder JA (1989) Generalised Liner Models. Chapman and Hall: London

  • Meyer TJ and Mark MM (1995) Effects of psychosocial interventions with adult cancer patients: A meta analysis of randomised experiments. Health Psychology 14: 101–108

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy J, Berwick D and Weinstein M (1987) Performance of screening and diagnostic tests: application of receiver operating characteristic analysis. Arch Gen Psychiatr 44: 550–555

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Newell S, Samson-Fisher R and Girgis A (1998) How well do medical oncologists perceptions reflect their patients reported physical and psychosocial problems?. Cancer 83: 1640–1651

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pinder KL, Ramirez AJ and Black E (1993) Psychiatric disorders in patients with advanced breast cancer: prevalence and associated factors. Eur J Cancer 29A: 524–527

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ramirez AJ and House A (1997) Common mental health problems in hospital. Brit Med J 314: 1679–1681

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ramirez AJ, Richards MA and Jarrett SR (1995) Can mood disorder in women with breast cancer be identified pre-operatively?. Brit J Cancer 72: 1509–1512

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Razavi D, Delvaux N and Faracques C (1990) Screening for adjustment disorders and major depressive disorders in cancer in patients. Brit J Psychiatry 156: 79–83

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Razavi D, Delvaux N and Bredart A (1992) Screening for psychiatric disorders in a lymphoma outpatient population. Eur J Cancer 28A: 1869–1872

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Revicki DA and Cella DF (1997) Health status assessment for the twenty-first century: Item response theory, item banking and computer adaptive testing. Quality of Life Research 6: 595–600

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson MM and Katona CC (1997) Depression and Physical Illness. John Wiley and Sons: Chichester

  • S-Plus User’s Guide. (1997) Data Analysis Products Division, Mathsoft: Seattle

  • Velikova G, Wright EP and Smith (1999) Automated collection of quality of life data: A comparison of paper and computer touchscreen questionnaires. J Clin Oncol 17: 998–1007

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Venables WN and Ripley BD (1997) Modern Applied Statistics with S-Plus. Springer: New York

  • Ware JE (1993) SF-36 Health Survey: Manual and Interpretation Guide. New England Medical Center: Boston, MA

  • Wing J, Cooper J and Sartorious N (1974). Measurement and Classification of Psychiatric Symptoms, Cambridge,Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Zigmond A and Snaith R (1983) The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand 67: 361–367

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Imperial Cancer Research Fund, Medical Oncology Unit, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK

    A Cull & V Strong

  2. Information and Statistics Division, NHS in Scotland, Edinburgh, UK

    A Gould

  3. Department of Liaison Psychiatry, University of Leeds, UK

    A House

  4. Imperial Cancer Research Fund, Cancer Medicine Research Unit, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK

    A Smith, G Velikova, P Wright & P Selby

Authors
  1. A Cull
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A Gould
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. A House
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. A Smith
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. V Strong
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. G Velikova
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. P Wright
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. P Selby
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

From twelve months after its original publication, this work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cull, A., Gould, A., House, A. et al. Validating automated screening for psychological distress by means of computer touchscreens for use in routine oncology practice. Br J Cancer 85, 1842–1849 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1054/bjoc.2001.2182

Download citation

  • Received: 21 March 2001

  • Revised: 02 August 2001

  • Accepted: 18 September 2001

  • Published: 11 December 2001

  • Issue date: 14 December 2001

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1054/bjoc.2001.2182

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • screening
  • psychological distress
  • computer touchscreens
  • routine practice
  • oncology

This article is cited by

  • Acceptability of a Touch Screen Tablet Psychosocial Survey Administered to Radiation Therapy Patients in Japan

    • Eiji Suzuki
    • Lisa Mackenzie
    • Masakazu Toi

    International Journal of Behavioral Medicine (2016)

  • Feasibility and acceptance of electronic monitoring of symptoms and syndromes using a handheld computer in patients with advanced cancer in daily oncology practice

    • D. Blum
    • D. Koeberle
    • K. Ribi

    Supportive Care in Cancer (2014)

  • No personalization without participation: on the active contribution of psychiatric patients to the development of a mobile application for mental health

    • Jean-François Pelletier
    • Michael Rowe
    • Sonia Lupien

    BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making (2013)

  • A mixed methods approach to adapting health-related quality of life measures for use in routine oncology clinical practice

    • Clare Harley
    • Elena Takeuchi
    • Galina Velikova

    Quality of Life Research (2012)

  • Accuracy of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale as a screening tool in cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    • Andrea Vodermaier
    • Roanne D. Millman

    Supportive Care in Cancer (2011)

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Current issue
  • Collections
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Journal Information
  • Open access publishing
  • About the Editors
  • Contact
  • Special Issues
  • For Advertisers
  • Subscribe

Publish with us

  • For Authors & Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

British Journal of Cancer (Br J Cancer)

ISSN 1532-1827 (online)

ISSN 0007-0920 (print)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2025 Springer Nature Limited