Table 6 Inheritance of homostyly in later generation crosses
Cross | Short | Homo | Long | G | P | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(a) ‘F 2 s’ tested against expected ratio of 3 homostyle: 1 long | ||||||
K12Lmho-4 H selfed | (SHs × SHs) | 0 | 65 | 16 | 1.25 | 0.26 |
K12Lmho-3 H selfed | (SHs × SHs) | 0 | 18 | 3 | 1.45 | 0.23 |
Pooled | 0 | 83 | 19 | 2.36 | 0.13 | |
Heterogeneity | 0.35 | 0.55 | ||||
(b) ‘Backcrosses’ into T. krapovickasii genetic background, tested against expected ratio of 1 homostyle: 1 long | ||||||
K12L × K12Lmho-4H | (ss × SHs) | 0 | 16 | 10 | 1.40 | 0.24 |
K12L × K12Lmho-3H | (ss × SHs) | 0 | 41 | 36 | 0.32 | 0.57 |
Pooled | 0 | 57 | 46 | 1.18 | 0.28 | |
Heterogeneity | 0.55 | 0.46 | ||||
(c) ‘Backcrosses’ into T. subulata genetic background, tested against expected ratio of 1 short : 1 homostyle | ||||||
(i) Pollen parent heterozygous, SSH | ||||||
S16L × Mhbry-9Sa | (ss × SHS) | 133 | 36 | 0 | 59.22 | <0.001 |
S16L × Mhbry-9Sb | (ss × SHS) | 95 | 13 | 0 | 70.30 | <0.001 |
S16L × Mhbry-14S | (ss × SHS) | 83 | 23 | 0 | 36.06 | <0.001 |
Pooled | 311 | 72 | 0 | 160.07 | <0.001 | |
Heterogeneity | — | — | — | 4.84 | 0.09 | |
(ii) Ovule parent heterozygous, SSH | ||||||
Mhbry-9S × S16L | (SHS × ss) | 59 | 29 | 0 | 10.44 | <0.001 |
Mhbry-9S × S16Lb | (SHS × ss) | 121 | 118 | 0 | 0.01 | 0.95 |
Pooled | 180 | 147 | 0 | 3.34 | 0.07 | |
Heterogeneity | — | — | 0 | 7.14 | 0.008 | |
Pooled reciprocals | 491 | 219 | 0 | 106.91 | <0.001 | |
Heterogeneity comparing pooled reciprocals | — | — | 57.17 | <0.001 | ||
Heterogeneity for all 5 crosses | — | — | — | 69.14 | <0.001 |