Table 3 Distribution of progeny types produced by maternal hermaphroditic and female plants. (a) Summarized data and (b) hierarchical contingency analysis
Parental population | Maternal hermaphrodite | Maternal female | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Â | N | % All female | % All hermaphrodite | % Mixed gender | N | % All female | % All hermaphrodite | % Mixed gender |
(a) Summarized data | ||||||||
 Weston (SF) | 18 | 0 | 50.0 | 50.0 | 19 | 57.9 | 10.5 | 31.6 |
 Hooper branch (LF) | 25 | 0 | 88.0 | 12.0 | 24 | 8.3 | 0 | 91.7 |
 Witter's (SH) | 37 | 0 | 27.0 | 73.0 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 100.0 |
 Revis (LH) | 29 | 0 | 75.9 | 24.1 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 100.0 |
Model effect | df | LLR | P-value | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
(b) Hierarchical contingency analysis | ||||||||
 Pop size × pop sex ratio × maternal gender × progeny type | 2 | 0.00 | 1.0000 |  |  |  |  |  |
 Pop sex ratio × maternal gender × progeny type | 4 | 1.51 | 0.8249 |  |  |  |  |  |
 Pop size × maternal gender × progeny type | 4 | 10.73 | 0.0298 |  |  |  |  |  |
Maternal gender × progeny type (S) | 2 | 31.12 | <0.0000 |  |  |  |  |  |
Maternal gender × progeny type (L) | 2 | 69.93 | <0.0000 |  |  |  |  |  |
Pop size × progeny type (H) | 1 | 25.79 | <0.0000 |  |  |  |  |  |
Pop size × progeny type (F) | 2 | 14.90 | 0.0006 |  |  |  |  |  |
 Pop size × pop sex ratio × progeny type | 4 | 0.02 | 1.0000 |  |  |  |  |  |
 Pop sex ratio × progeny type | 8 | 20.42 | 0.0089 |  |  |  |  |  |
