Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Commentary
  • Published:

Earlier markers for cerebral palsy and clinical research in premature infants

Abstract

The diagnosis of cerebral palsy is based on evidence of impairment of the motor system, but symptoms become evident only as a premature infant matures. The diagnosis is made typically at 18 to 24 months of age, corrected for gestational age at birth. An earlier and more accurate way to identify infants destined to develop cerebral palsy may help improve the prognosis for this vulnerable population. For now, no antenatal, perinatal or postnatal test can predict cerebral palsy with a degree of certainty high enough to help providers or parents plan for an infant's future or make the best use of early intervention resources.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Bax M . Terminology and classification of cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol 1964; 6: 295–297.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Blauw-Hospers CH, Hadders-Algra M . A systematic review of the effects of early intervention on motor development. Dev Med Child Neurol 2005; 47: 421–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. CDC. Economic costs associated with mental retardation, cerebral palsy, hearing loss, and vision impairment – United States, 2003. MMWR 2004; 53 (3): 57–59.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dunst CJ, Hamby DW, Fromewick J . Status and trends in the number of infants and toddlers served in the IDEA Part C Early Intervention Program (1994–2002). Snapshots 2004; 1 (1): 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Palmer FB . Strategies for the early diagnosis of cerebral palsy. J Pediatr 2004; 145: S8–S11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Nelson KB, Ellenberg JH . Neonatal signs as predictors of cerebral palsy. Pediatrics 1979; 64: 225–232.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. DiPietro JA . Neurobehavioral assessment before birth. Mental Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev 2005; 11: 4–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wood NS, Costeloe K, Gibson AT, Hennessy EM, Marlow N, Wilkinson AR et al. EPICure study: associations and antecedents of neurological and developmental disability at 30 months of age following extremely preterm birth. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2005; 90: F134–F140.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Huppi PS, Murphy B, Maier SE, Zientara GP, Inder TE, Barnes PD et al. Microstructural brain development after perinatal cerebral white matter injury assessed by diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging. Pediatrics 2001; 107: 455–460.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Dalal PG, Murray D, Cox T, McAllister J, Snider R . Sedation and anesthesia protocols used for magnetic resonance imaging studies in infants: provider and pharmacologic considerations. Anesth Analg 2006; 103: 863–868.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P K Donohue.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Donohue, P., Graham, E. Earlier markers for cerebral palsy and clinical research in premature infants. J Perinatol 27, 259–261 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jp.7211741

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jp.7211741

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links