Abstract
In linkage studies, errors in pedigree structure will often be uncovered through Mendelian inconsistencies. In affected sib pair analysis of diseases with late onset, however, such mistakes will usually go undetected since parental genotypes are commonly not known. Cases of nonpaternity, unrecorded adoption or accidental sample swap in the laboratory will then not be noticed. Typically, such relationship errors lead to a decrease in power for linkage. In this paper, a method is presented which allows verification of the relationship between stated sibs using their marker genotypes. The method is likelihood-based and incorporates a Bayesian approach to compute posterior relationship probabilities. It is shown that sibs, half-sibs and unrelated individuals can be distinguished from each other quite reliably using numbers of markers that should be available in most sib pair studies. It is demonstrated that elimination of false sib pairs increases the power to detect linkage in affected sib pair studies. The gain in power may be large if relationship errors occur quite frequently; the gain will be only moderate if relationship errors are very infrequent. Software for relationship estimation is provided.
Similar content being viewed by others
Log in or create a free account to read this content
Gain free access to this article, as well as selected content from this journal and more on nature.com
or
References
Suarez BK, Reich T, Fishman PM: Variability in sib pair genetic identity. Hum Hered 1979; 29:37–41.
Risch N, Lange K: Application of a recombination model in calculating the variance of sib pair genetic identity. Ann Hum Genet 1979;43: 177–186.
Rasmuson M: Variation in genetic identity within kinships. Heredity 1993;70:266–268.
Guo S-W: Variation in genetic identity among relatives. Hum Hered 1996;46:61–70.
Chakraborty R, Jin L: Determination of relat-edness between individuals using DNA fingerprinting. Hum Biol 1993;65:875–895.
Thompson EA: The estimation of pairwise relationships. Ann Hum Genet 1975;39:173–188.
Thompson EA: Pedigree analysis in human genetics. Baltimore, Hopkins, 1986.
Thompson EA: Estimation of relationship from genetic data; in Rao CR, Chakraborty R (eds): Handbook of statistics. North Holland, Amsterdam, 1991, vol 8, pp 255–269.
Mérette C, Ott J: Estimating parental relationship in linkage analysis of recessive traits. Am J Med Genet 1996;63:386–391.
Ehm MG, Wagner M: Test statistic to detect errors in sib-pair relationships. Am J Hum Genet 1996;59:A217 (abstract).
Cotterman CW: A calculus for statistico-genet-ics; PhD thesis, Ohio State University, 1940; in Ballonoff P (ed): Genetics and Social Structure. Benchmark Papers in Genetics. Dowden, Hutchinson & Ross, 1975, pp 157–272.
Haseman JK, Elston RC: The investigation of linkage between a quantitative trait and a marker locus. Behav Genet 1972;2:3–19.
Bishop DT, Williamson JA: The power of identity-by-state methods for linkage analysis. Am J Hum Genet 1990;46:254–265.
Elston RC: Probability and paternity testing. Am J Hum Genet 1986;39:112–122.
Goldgar DE, Thompson EA: Bayesian interval estimation of genetic relationships: Application to paternity testing. Am J Hum Genet 1988;42:135–142.
Brzustowicz LM, Mérette C, Xie X, Townsend L, Gilliam TC, Ott J: Molecular and statistical approaches to the detection and correction of errors in genotype databases. Am J Hum Genet 1993;53:1137–1145.
Sasse G, Müller H, Chakraborty R, Ott J: Estimating the frequency of nonpaternity in Switzerland. Hum Hered 1994;44:337–343.
Blackwelder WC, Elston RC: A comparison of sib-pair linkage tests for disease susceptibility loci. Genet Epidemiol 1985;2:85–97.
Lander E, Kruglyak L: Genetic dissection of complex traits: Guidelines for interpreting and reporting linkage results. Nature Genet 1995; 11:241–247.
Holmans P: Asymptomatic properties of affected-sib-pair linkage analysis. Am J Hum Genet 1993;52:362–374.
Ott J:Strategies for characterization highly polymorphic markers in human gene mapping. Am J Hum Genet 1992;51:283–290.
Acknowledgments
This material is based upon work supported by US Army Medical Research Acquisition Activity under award No. DAMD17-94-J-4406. Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the view of the US Army Medical Research Acquisition Activity.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Göring, H.H.H., Ott, J. Relationship Estimation in Affected Sib Pair Analysis of Late-Onset Diseases. Eur J Hum Genet 5, 69–77 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03405880
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03405880
