Table 1 Impact of haematological cancer on QoL or HRQoL

From: Haematological cancer and quality of life: a systematic literature review

Article

Design

Population

Disease status/treatment

Procedure

Psychometrics instruments

Results

Cull et al.15

Comparative

Test group:

91 patients:

- 55 HL

- 36 NHL

No-test group:a 109 patientsb

Disease-free

Chemotherapy

Patients completed the instruments and returned them with a form giving preferred times for objective testing

QLQ-C30

HADS

MFI

BMFQ

Memory aids

NART

PASAT

RBMT

Poor QoL in complainers of memory problems

No-test group reported better cognitive functioning but more fatigue than the test group (U=2.0, P=0.05)

Test group: 30% patients reported difficulty in concentrating, 52% in remembering things, 63%, memory impairment, 13% possible anxiety and 10% possible depression

Zittoun et al.33

Longitudinal

179 acute leukaemia patients

Chemotherapy or BMT

T1: 1 day after the end of chemotherapy or BMT

T2: 10 days later the end of chemotherapy

T3: 21 days after the end of chemotherapy

QLQ-C30

HADS

Leukaemia/BMT module

Lack of appetite (T1=64%, T2=53%, T3=49%; P=0.03), fever (T1=24%, T2=47%, T3=22%; P0.001), nausea (T1=38%, T2=23%, T3=16%; P0.001), vomiting (T1=35%, T2=17%, T3=16%; P0.001), and hair loss (T1=19%, T2=54%, T3=60%; P0.001)

High frequency of anxiety and depression over time

Trend to improvement at the end of treatment

Heinonen et al.19

Longitudinal

109 patients:

- 32 CML

- 39 AML

- 15 ALL

- 13 MDS

- 5 MM

- 2 NHL

- 2 AA

- 1 myelofibrosis

Allogeneic BMT

T1: 12 months after BMT

T2: 12 to 36 months after BMT

T3: 36 to 60 months after BMT

T4: >60 months after BMT

FACT-BMT

POMS

ADL Scale

MOS-SS

SSQ6

T1: worse perception of physical well-being (P=0.000, PV=20%), anxiety (12: MS=9.8; s.d.=5.0; over 12: MS=7.6; s.d.=4.2; F= 4.1*) and mood disturbance (12: MS=49.1; s.d.=25.0; F=4.8*)

Deterioration of availability and satisfaction with social support

Most of patients could carry on with their daily activities without any help

Functional well-being negatively affected (T1=16.8%, T2=27.1%, T3=21.5%, T4=34.6%) because of lack of energy and sleeping disorders

Persson et al.25

Longitudinal

16 patients:

- 7 AL

- 9 HML

Chemotherapy

7 patients had no relapse

6 patients had a relapse

3 patients died before remission

T1: start of treatment

T2: 4 months after treatment

T3: 8 months

T4: 12 months

T5: 16 months

T6: 20 months

T7: 24 months

QLQ-C30

T1: Deterioration of QoL, role and social functioning (more important in AL than HML patients) with fatigue, dyspnoea and sleep disturbances

Deterioration of QoL in patients with relapses than those without relapse

T7: Deterioration of role, social, cognitive and emotional functioning and poor QoL, essentially in patients with relapses

Deterioration of role and social functioning more important in AL than HML patients

Wettergren et al.32

Comparative

357 subjects:

- 121 HL survivors

- 236 CG

Long-term survivors

Radiation, chemotherapy or combined modality

Scales sent by postal mail

Respondents were promised a movie ticket if they participated in the study

SEIQoL-DW

HL survivors reported leisure and finance less frequently than CG (leisure: HL survivors=31.4% and CG=47.9%; df=1; P=0.003; finance: HL survivors=29.8% and CG=41.5%; df=1; P=0.03)

Fatigue, loss of energy in HL patients (10.7%; N=13 on 121; MS=3.0; s.d.=1.0)

Sherman et al.29

Pilot

61 patients:

- 52 MM

- 5 MGUS

- 4 amyloid

Patients newly admitted to the transplant programme

Stage of diseases:c

- 13 for the stage I

- 10 for the stage II

- 32 for the stage III

- 6 unknown

Assessment prior to starting local protocols for conditioning and transplant

SF-12

POMS-F

PG-SGA

BPI

HADS

FACIT

Major symptoms: nutritional deficits, deterioration of physical functioning, fatigue and pain, emotional distress, disrupted sexual functioning and difficulties with body image

Rüffer et al.26

Comparative

1753 subjects:

- 818 HL survivors

- 935 CG

Long-term survivors

Radiotherapy, chemotherapy Combined modality treatment

In 1995, the authors had contacted 1981 patients, who were enrolled in the German Hodgkin Studies

Patients with a current status of complete remission were contacted to participate in this study

QLQ-S

QLQ-C30

LSQ

MFI

All levels of fatigue are high even years after treatment and higher than those of the CG:

GF: Patients: MS=37.6; s.d.=29.1/CG: MS=30.9; s.d.=23.2; P<0.001

PF: Patients: MS=32.6; s.d.=29.2/CG: MS=25.0; s.d.=24.2; P<0.001

RA: Patients: MS=28.0; s.d.=26.1/CG: MS=21.4; s.d.=21.8; P<0.001

MF: Patients: MS=26.6; s.d.=26.8/CG: MS=21.8; s.d.=23.5; P<0.001

RM: Patients: MS=19.8; s.d.=20.1/CG: MS=16.9; s.d.=18.1; P<0.001

Association between severe illnesses with fatigue

Gulbrandsen et al.18

Comparative

Data from two prospective Nordic Myeloma Study Group Trials:

- 221 patients <60 years treated with high-dose chemotherapy

- 203 patients >60 years treated with MP

Patients newly diagnosed with MM, with addition to low-dose IFN alpha 2b to conventional treatment with MP Comparison of results with the Norwegian population

Data obtained from prospective trials

QLQ-C30

At diagnosis, most distressing problems: pain, fatigue, reduced physical functioning, limitations in role functioning and reduced QoL

Frick et al.17

Comparative

46 MM

20 NHL

13 other diseasesd

Complete remission: 6 patients

Partial remission: 52 patients

No change: 15 patients

Progressive disease: 1 patient

Not available

PBSCT: 5 patients

Randomisation:

- individualised Psychodynamic short term Psychotherapy immediately after PBSCT until 6 months after PBSCT

- from 6 months after PBSCT until 1 year after

- to a CG receiving ‘treatment as usual’

QLQ-C30

SEIQoL-DW

Most frequent domains nominated by the patients: family (89%), hobbies/pastimes (74%), physical health (mobility) (70%), profession/occupation (51%), social life/friends (47%) and partnership (33%)

Merli et al.22

Longitudinal

91 aggressive NHL

Chemotherapy

T1: diagnosis and before treatment T2: during chemotherapy T3: 1 month after the end of chemotherapy

QLQ-C30

T1: association between anaemia and poor QoL

T2: improvements of QoL, pain (P=0.003), appetite (P=0.006), sleep (P=0.015) and GH (P=0.027), except diarrhoea and social activity

T3: improvements of QoL (P=0.05), global health (P=0.011), appetite (P=0.0001), emotional functioning (P=0.01) and role (P=0.05), reductions of pain (P=0.02), sleep disorders (P=0.007) and constipation (P=0.04)

Holzner et al.20

Longitudinal

76 CLL

152 HC

Chemotherapy

T1: baseline

T2: 3 months after baseline

T3: 6 months after baseline

T4: 12 months after baseline

QLQ-C30

Lower QoL in CLL patients compared with HC

Physical functioning: effect size medium (ES −0.56; P<0.001)

Role and cognitive functioning: effect size small (ES −0.43, P<0.01 and ES −0.27, P<0.1)

More symptoms in CLL patients compared with HC: fatigue (ES 0.81), nausea and vomiting (0.69), constipation (0.69), appetite loss (0.68) and dyspnoea (0.44)

Lower emotional and social QoL in female than in male patients

Vallance et al.31

Retrospective

438 NHL survivors:

- 255 indolent

- 183 agressive

- 283 with chemotherapy

- 68 with chemotherapy and radiation

- 47 with radiation

- 16 with surgery

- 4 with immunotherapy

- 36 with BMT

Questionnaire mailed to patients

FACT-An

Better QoL in NHL meeting public health exercise guidelines than NHL not meeting guidelines

Santos et al.27

Cross-sectional

107 patients:

- 54 NHL

- 18 AML

- 10 ALL

- 25 MM

In treatment:

- 42 with intravenous chemotherapy

- 5 with oral medication

- 5 with radiotherapy

- 55 with monitoring

Instruments applied during face-to-face interviews

QLQ-C30

Deterioration of QoL essentially in MM patients, contrary to patients with other cancers

Mols et al.24

Comparative

116 long-term HL survivorse

- 48 patients for the 5–9 year survivors

- 68 patients for the 10–15 year survivors

Off-treatment

Survey conducted at the ECRf

SF 36

QoL-CS

Better QoL in patients diagnosed 10–15 years ago compared with patients 5–9 years ago

Lower GH and lack of energy in patients diagnosed 10–15 years ago than patients diagnosed 5–9 years ago

Lower general and mental health, social functioning and vitality in patients diagnosed 5–9 years ago, compared with normative sample

Mols et al.23

Comparative

221 NHL

Sample size for population is not specified

Long-term survivors (5–15 years postdiagnosis)

Recruited from the ECR

SF-36

QoL-CS

Patients diagnosed from 10 to 15 years earlier reported better psychological (β= 0.17*) and social (β= 0.21**) well-being than patients diagnosed from 5 to 9 years earlier

Compared with population, patients reported worse GH (P<0.001), less vitality (P<0.001), higher scores for pain (P<0.001) and problems with work or obtaining health-care insurance and home mortgage

Shanafelt et al.28

Comparative

1482 CLL

Majority of patients with low-stage disease at diagnosis

40.3% of patients with chemotherapy and/or monoclonal antibody

Between June and October 2006

FACT-G

BFI

QoL and social and functional dimensions were similar to or better than population norms

QoL was worse in patients with advanced stage of disease

Lower emotional well-being in CLL patients, compared with population and patients with other types of cancer

Else et al.16

Comparative

431 CLL

Chemotherapy

Randomisation into the Leukaemia Research Fund CLL4 trial

Instruments given at the start of chemotherapy

QLQ-C30

Impaired HRQoL for the fatigue, sleep disturbance, role functioning and dyspnoea in CLL patients compared with population

Strasser-Weippl and Ludwig13

Randomized clinical trial

92 MM

Chemotherapy

Questionnaires presented to patients during the first study visit of the clinical trial

Conventional treatment

QLQ-C30

Impairment of QoL at onset on therapy

Courneya et al.14

Longitudinal

122 patients:

- 52 indolent NHL

- 48 aggressive NHL

- 22 HL

62 patients with UC

60 patients with AET

T0: baseline

T1: postintervention

T2: 6-month follow-up

FACT-An

Happiness Scale

Depression Short Form

Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression Scale

STAI

SF-12

T1: better physical functioning (mean group difference, +9.0; CI=2.0 to 16.0; P=0.012), cardiovascular fitness (P<0.001), QoL (P=0.021), happiness (P=0.004) and GH (P<0.001) and attenuation of fatigue (P=0.013) and depression (P=0.005) in AET compared with UC patients

T2: better happiness (P=0.034), and attenuation of depression (P=0.009) in AET, comparatively UC patients

Johnsen et al.21

Cross-

sectional

470 patients:

- 34 AML

- 132 CLL

- 34 CML

- 33 HL

- 164 NHL

- 54 MM

- 19 ALL, myelofibrosis or unclassified leukaemia

- 269 patients had lymphoma stage 1 or 2

- 60 patients had inaccessible lymphoma stage

- 99 patients had no treatment

- 358 patients had active antineoplastic treatment

Scales, information letter and consent form send by mail

QLQ-C30

Symptoms experienced by patients: fatigue (55%), insomnia (46%) and pain (37%)

Impairments: role (49%) and physical functions (34%)

More problems (physical, role, social functions, pain and constipation) in MM in comparison to other patients

More reduced in physical (OR2=1.53; 95% CL= 1.36–1.74; P<0.001) and role functions (OR2=1.32; 95% CL= 1.16–1.51; P<0.001), constipation (OR2=1.47; 95% CL=1.22–1.78; P<0.001), appetite loss (OR2=1.28; 95% CL=1.08–1.51; P=0.004) and pain (OR2=1.28; 95% CL=1.13–1.45; P<0.001) in older patients, compared with younger patients, but less financial difficulties (OR2=0.76; 95% CL=0.65–0.89; P<0.001) in older patients

More nausea (OR2=2.98; 95% CL=1.30–6.83; P=0.010) and appetite loss (OR2=3.14; 95% CL=1.33–7.41; P=0.009) in recently hospitalised patients than outpatients

Smith et al.30

Comparative

761 NHL survivors:

- 109 patients with ‘active disease’

- 150 ‘short-term survivors’

- 502 ‘long-term survivors’

STS (2–4 years postdiagnosis)

LTS (5 years postdiagnosis)

Scales send by mail

SF-36

FACT-G

FACT-LYM

IOC

Self-administered Comorbidity Questionnaire

PTSD Checklist

Lower QoL, physical (mean (s.d.), 41.1 (11.9)) and mental health (mean (s.d.), 45.4 (11.5)) (all P0.01) in individuals with active disease, compared with survivors

  1. Abbreviations: AA, acute amyloid; ADL, Activities of Daily Living Scale (Katz et al., 1970); AET, aerobic exercise training; AL, acute leukaemia; ALL, acute lymphoblastic leukaemia; AML, acute myeloid leukaemia; BFI, Brief Fatigue Inventory (Mendoza et al., 1999); BMFQ, Brief Mental Fatigue Questionnaire (Bentall et al., 1993); BMT, bone marrow transplantation; BPI, Brief Pain Inventory (Cleeland, 1989); CG, control group; CLL, chronic lymphocytic leukaemia; CML, chronic myelogenous leukaemia; ECR, Eindhoven Cancer Registry; FACT-An, Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy—Anaemia (Cella, 1997); FACT-BMT, Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy—Bone Marrow Transplant (McQuellon et al., 1197); FACT-G, Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (Cella et al., 2003); FACIT, Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (Cella, 1997); GF, general fatigue; GH, general health; HADS, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (Snaith et Zigmond, 1983); HRQoL, health-related quality of life; HL, Hodgkin’s lymphoma; HML, highly malignant lymphoma; IFN, interferon; IOC, Impact Of Cancer (Zebrack et al., 2008); LSQ, Life Situation Questionnaire (Joly et al., 1996); LTS, long-term survivors; MA, mean age; MCS, Mental Component Summary; MDS, myelodysplastic syndrome; MF, mental fatigue; MFI-20, Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (Smets et al., 2000); MM, multiple myeloma; MGUS, monoclonal gammopathy of unknown significance; MIRT, Myeloma Institute for Research and Therapy; MOS SS, Medical Outcome Study Social Support (Sherbourne & Stewart, 1991); MP, Melphalan and Prednisone; NART, National Adult Reading Test (Nelson, 1991); NHL, Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma; PASAT, Paced Auditory Serial Addition Task (Gronwall & Sampson, 1974); PF, Physical Fatigue; PBSCT, peripheral blood stem cell transplantation; PCS, Physical Component Summary; PG-SGA, Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (Ottery, 1996); POMS, Profile of Mood States (McNair et al., 1971); POMS-F, Profile of Mood States—Fatigue Scale (McNair et al., 1992); PTSD Checklist, PostTraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist (Weathers et al., 1993); QLQC30, Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 (Aaronson et al., 1983); QLQ-S, Quality of Life Questionnaire—Survivors (Sprangers et al., 1993); QoL, quality of life; QoL-CS, quality of life—cancer survivors; RA, reduced activity; RBMT, Rivermead Behavioural Memory Test (Wislon et al., 1991); RM, reduced motivation; SEIQoL-DW, Schedule for the Evaluation of the Individual Quality of Life-Direct Weighting (Browne et al., 1997); SF-12, Short Form 12 items (Ware, 1995); SF-36, Short-Form 36 items; SSQ6, Brief Measure of Social Support (Sarason et al., 1987); STAI, Spielberger State Anxiety Inventory (Spielberger, 1993); STS, short-term survivors; UC, usual care. *P<0.05; **P<0.01.
  2. aPatients who did not present for psychometric testing with respect to age, sex, employment, educational status, diagnosis, therapy received or duration of treatment.
  3. bMA not specified in the manuscript.
  4. cStaged using Durie and Salmon classification.
  5. dMA not specified, most patients are between 50 and 60 years.
  6. eMA not specified, most patients are between 35 and 49 years.
  7. fThis register identifies all patients newly diagnosed with cancer in the southern part of the Netherlands.