Key Points
-
A qualitative study of the meaning of oral health for people with visibly damaged teeth who did and did not go to the dentist.
-
The relevance of oral health varied between people and changed over time.
-
People constructed their own 'margins of relevance' of oral health, which influenced dental attendance.
-
Dentists can explore and challenge the margins of relevance to open new horizons for their patients.
Abstract
Background Low expectations of health mean that oral health becomes a low priority for some people, an appreciation of which would help dentists when a non-attender does come to the surgery.
Objective To provide an insight into why oral health is not important to some people and how this attitude might hinder access to dental care.
Method In this qualitative study, purposive sampling was used to recruit two groups of participants with sociably visible missing, decayed or broken teeth but apparently differing responses to that status. The data analysis used social systems theory as operationalised by grounded theory techniques.
Results The core category that emerged from the data was that people constructed their own 'margins of the relevance' of oral health. For some people oral health was highly relevant whilst for others it was not very relevant. The degree of relevance of oral health was organised along seven dimensions: the perceived 'normal' state of oral health, the perceived causes of oral health and disease, the degree of trust held in dentistry, perceptions of oral 'health' as a commodity, perceptions of the accessibility of oral health care, perceptions of 'natural' oral health and judgements of character.
Conclusions If certain aspects of oral health are not relevant, little that is said about those aspects will be meaningful to people. The key is to either emphasize or gently challenge those ideas and beliefs that allow or hinder the margins of relevance.
Similar content being viewed by others
Log in or create a free account to read this content
Gain free access to this article, as well as selected content from this journal and more on nature.com
or
References
Finch H, Keegan J, Ward K et al. Barriers to the receipt of dental care: a qualitative research study. London: Social and Community Planning Research, 1988.
Land T . What patients think of dental services. Br Dent J 2000; 189: 21–24.
Lahti S, Verkasalo M, Hausen H, Tuutti H . Ideal role behaviours as seen by dentists and patients themselves and by their role partners: do they differ? Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1996; 24: 245–248.
Carr A J, Gibson B J, Robinson P G . Measuring quality of life: is quality of life determined by expectations or experience? Br Med J 2001; 322: 1240–1243.
Todd J E, Lader D . Adult dental health 1988, United Kingdom. London: OPCS, 1991.
Blinkhorn A S, Hastings G B, Leathar D S . Attitudes towards dental care among young people in Scotland. Br Dent J 1983; 155: 311–313.
Nuttall N M . Initial development of a scale to measure dental indifference. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1996; 24: 112–126.
Hill K B, White D A, Morris A J, Goodwin N, Burke F J T . National evaluation of personal dental services: a qualitative investigation into patients' perception of dental services. Br Dent J 2003; 195: 654–656.
Luhmann N . Social systems. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1984.
Glaser B . Doing grounded theory. Mill Valley: Sociology Press, 1998.
Gregory J, Gibson B, Robinson P G . Variation and change in the meaning of oral health related quality of life: a 'grounded' systems approach. Soc Sci Med 2005; 60: 1859–1868.
Weiss M, Britten N . What is concordance? Pharm J 2003; 271: 493.
Gibson B J . Access to dental services. In Gulliford M, Morgan M (eds) Access to health care. pp 174–188. London: Routledge, 2003.
National Collaborating Centre for Acute Care. Dental recall. Recall interval between routine dental examinations. London: National Institute for Clinical Excellence, 2004. Clinical Guideline 19.
Higgs P, Hyde M, Wiggins R, Blane D . Researching quality of life in early old age: the importance of the sociological dimension. Soc Pol Admin 2003; 37: 239–252.
Gibson B J, Drennan J, Hanna S, Freeman R . An exploratory qualitative study examining the social and psychological processes involved in regular dental attendance. J Public Health Dent 2000; 60: 5–11.
Lupton D . The imperative of health. London: Sage Publications, 1995.
MacEntee M I, Hole R, Stolar E . The significance of the mouth in old age. Soc Sci Med 1997; 45: 1449–1458.
Crawford R . Healthism and the medicalisation of everyday life. Int J Health Sci 1980; 10: 365–368.
Bauman Z . Work, consumerism and the new poor. Buckingham: Open University Press, 1998.
Freire P . Pedagogy of the oppressed. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1972.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Refereed Paper
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gregory, J., Gibson, B. & Robinson, P. The relevance of oral health for attenders and non-attenders: a qualitative study. Br Dent J 202, E18 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/bdj.2007.150
Accepted:
Published:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/bdj.2007.150
This article is cited by
-
Trends and inequalities in realised access to NHS primary care dental services in England before, during and throughout recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic
British Dental Journal (2023)
-
Barrier to Access or Cost Share? Coinsurance and Dental-Care Utilization in Colombia
Applied Health Economics and Health Policy (2016)
-
Evidence summary: do people living in deprived areas define oral health differently from people who live in less deprived areas?
British Dental Journal (2010)
