Table a5 Sensitivity analyses for primary and secondary outcomes of mould-active vs fluconazole prophylaxis

From: Mould-active compared with fluconazole prophylaxis to prevent invasive fungal diseases in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy or haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

 

Analyses for all included studies

 

Sensitivity analysis-studies of itraconazole capsules removed ( Annaloro et al, 1995; Huijgens et al, 1999b)

Outcome

Risk ratio* (95% CI)

P -value

Risk ratio* (95% CI)

P- value

Proven or probable IFI

0.71 (0.52, 0.98)

0.03

0.68 (0.49, 0.94)

0.02

Invasive aspergillosis

0.53 (0.37, 0.75)

0.0004

0.50 (0.35, 0.71)

0.0001

Adverse events requiring antifungal treatment discontinuation or modification

1.95 (1.24, 3.07)

0.004

1.95 (1.24, 3.07)

0.004

IFI-related mortality

0.67 (0.47, 0.96)

0.03

0.62 (0.43, 0.90)

0.01

Invasive aspergillosis-related mortality

0.62 (0.23, 1.71)

0.36

0.41 (0.12, 1.39)

0.15

Overall mortality

1.00 (0.88, 1.13)

0.96

0.99 (0.87, 1.13)

0.85

   

Sensitivity analysis-studies of Itraconazole 200 mg per day removed ( Choi et al, 2005; Ito et al, 2007b; Ota et al, 2010)

Proven or probable IFI

0.71 (0.52, 0.98)

0.03

0.72 (0.53, 0.99)

0.05

Invasive aspergillosis

0.53 (0.37, 0.75)

0.0004

0.54 (0.38, 0.76)

0.0005

Adverse events requiring antifungal treatment discontinuation or modification

1.95 (1.24, 3.07)

0.004

1.85 (1.13, 3.03)

0.01

IFI-related mortality

0.67 (0.47, 0.96)

0.03

0.66 (0.46, 0.95)

0.02

Invasive aspergillosis-related mortality

0.62 (0.23, 1.71)

0.36

0.62 (0.23, 1.71)

0.36

Overall mortality

1.00 (0.88, 1.13)

0.96

1.00 (0.88, 1.14)

0.98

  1. Abbreviations: CI=confidence interval; IFI=invasive fungal infection. *RR<1 represents an advantage of mould-active coverage compared with fluconazole using a random-effects model.