Table 3 Summary of discordant results between different tests

From: Comparing the performance of six human papillomavirus tests in a screening population

 

BD HPV

Roche Cobas

Qiagen Hybrid Capture 2

Abbott RealTi m e High Risk HPV

Gen-Probe APTIMA

NorChip PreTect HPV-Proofer

BD HPV

0.83

0.78

0.81

0.65

0.33

Roche Cobas

(145, 134)a

0.75

0.85

0.64

0.35

 

1.1 (0.8, 1.4)

     

Qiagen Hybrid Capture 2

(204, 141)

(225, 174)

0.78

0.68

0.35

 

1.4 (1.2, 1.8)

1.3 (1.1, 1.6)

    

Abbott RealTime High Risk HPV

(227, 57)

(194, 35)

(216, 108)

0.70

0.39

 

4.0 (3.0, 5.4)

5.5 (3.9, 8.2)

2.0 (1.6, 2.5)

   

Gen-Probe APTIMA

(421, 70)

(414, 77)

(353, 68)

(279, 97)

0.45

 

6.0 (4.7, 7.9)

5.4 (4.2, 6.9)

5.2 (4.0, 6.8)

2.9 (2.3, 3.7)

  

NorChip PreTect HPV-Proofer

(684, 61)

(670, 54)

(625, 63)

(532, 65)

(375, 82)

 

11.2 (8.6, 14.8)

12.4 (9.4, 16.7)

9.9 (7.6, 13.1)

8.2 (6.3, 10.8)

4.6 (3.6, 5.9)

 
  1. Number in top half of Table represent kappa values. Numbers in bottom half of Table give discordant pairs (column positive/row negative vs column negative/row positive) and OR (95% CI).
  2. 145 Tested positive for BD HPV and negative for Roche Cobas, and 134 tested negative for BD HPV and positive for Roche Cobas.