Table a3 Distributions used in the probabilistic sensitivity analysis

From: Cost-effectiveness of sentinel lymph node biopsy vs inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy in women with vulval cancer

Parameter

Distribution

alpha

beta

Patients with metastasis*

Beta

135

268

Blue dye detection rate

Beta

202

92

99mTc detection rate

Beta

227

13

Blue dye + 99mTc detection rate

Beta

1050

25

Negative predictive value of H&E + ultrastaging*

Beta

253

6

Sensitivity of H&E

Beta

80

55

Local recurrence

Beta

34

242

Groin recurrence following IFL (no SLN biopsy)

Beta

1

31

Groin Recurrence following positive SLN biopsy and IFL

Beta

11

124

Death following a local recurrence

Beta

5

29

Death following a groin recurrence

Beta

9

2

RT following IFL in the comparison arm

Beta

26

30

RT with IFL following a true positive histopathology result

Beta

49

68

Short-term morbidity following IFL

Beta

22.6

24.4

Short-term morbidity following SLN biopsy

Beta

41.4

222.6

Long-term morbidity following IFL + RT

Beta

23.7

25.3

Long-term morbidity following IFL without RT

Beta

20.9

49.1

Long-term morbidity following SLN Biopsy

Beta

6.1

257.9

Bed days following a primary excision/SLN biopsy

Gamma

1.925

2.007

Bed days following a IFL

Gamma

3.504

1.6103

  1. Abbreviations: H&E=haematoxylin and eosin; IFL=inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy; SLN=sentinel lymph node.