Table 3 Subgroup analyses for evaluating clinicopathologic characteristics of endometriosis-associated ovarian cancer

From: Risk and prognosis of ovarian cancer in women with endometriosis: a meta-analysis

    

Heterogeneity

 

Category

No. of studies with references

RR

95% CI

P

I 2

Model used

FIGO stage I–II disease

Study design

 Case–control

2

1.983

1.683–2.336

0.973

0

Fixed effect

 Cohort

4

1.920

1.020–3.616

<0.001

91.975

Radom effects

Adjustment for potential confounding factors

 Age

5

1.973

1.297–3.003

<0.001

89.656

Random effects

Grade 1 disease

Study design

 Case–control

14

1.354

1.169–1.568

0.743

0

Fixed effect

Quality of study (NOS)

7

11

1.328

1.155–1.528

0.456

0

Fixed effect

 <7

4

1.087

0.518–2.280

0.963

0

Fixed effect

Assessment of endometriosis

 Histology

3

1.801

0.898–3.610

0.063

63.872

Random effects

 Self-report

12

1.303

1.121–1.515

0.945

0

Fixed effect

Adjustment for potential confounding factors

 Two factorsa

13

1.330

1.147–1.543

0.858

0

Fixed effect

 Eight factorsb

12

1.303

1.121–1.515

0.945

0

Fixed effect

Nulliparity

Assessment of endometriosis

 Histology

3

1.648

1.212–2.241

0.150

47.262

Fixed effect

Adjustment for potential confounding factors

 Age

3

1.319

1.237–1.407

0.308

15.038

Fixed effect

Optimal debulking surgery

Study design

 Case–control

2

1.739

0.630–4.799

<0.001

97.838

Random effects

 Cohort

3

1.147

0.973–1.352

0.239

30.192

Fixed effect

Adjustment for potential confounding factors

 Age

4

1.376

0.827–2.290

<0.001

94.729

Random effects

  1. Abbreviations: CI=confidence interval; FIGO= International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics; NOS=Newcastle–Ottawa Scale; RR=risk ratio.
  2. aAdjusted for age and race.
  3. bAge, body mass index, breastfeeding, family history of ovarian cancer, history of tubal ligation, parity, race, and use of oral contraceptive.