Table 1 Diagnosis of colon or rectal cancer following EP by patients’ socio-demographic characteristics (univariable analysis)

From: Do colorectal cancer patients diagnosed as an emergency differ from non-emergency patients in their consultation patterns and symptoms? A longitudinal data-linkage study in England

 

Colon cancer

Rectal cancer

 

Non-EP a

EP

Total

 

Non-EP a

EP

Total

 
 

N =668

N =361

N =1029

 

N =490

N =87

N =577

 
 

%

%

N

P -value b

%

%

N

P -value b

Gender

Men

67.8

32.2

537

0.044

87.5

12.5

336

0.041

Women

61.8

38.2

492

 

81.3

18.7

241

 

Age (years)

25–59

67.8

32.2

152

0.041

92.8

7.2

97

0.003

60–69

68.6

31.4

204

 

85.0

15.0

133

 

70–79

69.6

30.4

362

 

86.6

13.4

216

 

80+

55.6

44.4

311

 

76.3

23.7

131

 

Socio-economic deprivation quintile

1 (least deprived)

67.2

32.8

268

0.159

90.9

9.1

143

<0.001

2

63.0

37.0

211

 

86.4

13.6

125

 

3

69.3

30.7

228

 

87.2

12.8

125

 

4

63.4

36.6

205

 

81.1

18.9

111

 

5 (most deprived)

57.3

42.7

117

 

72.6

27.4

73

 

Geographic region

North

66.0

34.0

235

0.780

80.1

19.9

151

0.170

Midlands/East England

62.5

37.5

307

 

85.3

14.7

177

 

London

66.2

33.8

71

 

82.5

17.5

40

 

South

65.9

34.1

416

 

88.5

11.5

209

 
  1. Abbreviation: EP=emergency presentation.
  2. aNon-emergency routes included non-urgent GP referrals (colon cancer: 36%; rectal cancer: 45%), ‘two-week wait’ GP referrals (colon cancer: 10%; rectal cancer: 21%) and elective in-/out-patients (20% for both cancers). Screening accounted only for 0.2% of rectal cancers, as the programme started in 2006.
  3. bχ2-Test was used for gender and region. Test for trend was used for age and socio-economic deprivation.