Table 3 HRs (95% CI) for CRC and subsites by quintiles (Q) of PC1 score and for 1 s.d. increase in PC1 score

From: Main nutrient patterns and colorectal cancer risk in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition study

 

Q1

Q2

Q3

Q4

Q5

P -trend

HR (95% CI) per 1 s.d. increase

P -value HR continuous for 1 s.d. increase

Colorectum

N cases

1133

949

916

812

707

   

Basica

1.00 (Ref)

0.97 (0.89–1.07)

1.00 (0.9–1.10)

0.92 (0.83–1.02)

0.95 (0.84–1.06)

0.261

0.96 (0.93–1.00)

0.061

Multivariableb

1.00 (Ref)

0.99 (0.90–1.08)

1.02 (0.92–1.12)

0.94 (0.85–1.05)

0.98 (0.88–1.11)

0.686

0.98 (0.94–1.02)

0.264

Colon

N cases

691

598

581

517

482

   

Basica

1.00 (Ref)

0.96 (0.86–1.08)

0.96 (0.85–1.08)

0.87 (0.76–0.99)

0.95 (0.82–1.10)

0.304

0.96 (0.91–1.01)

0.093

Multivariableb

1.00 (Ref)

0.97 (0.86–1.09)

0.97 (0.86–1.10)

0.89 (0.78–1.01)

0.98 (0.85–1.13)

0.558

0.97 (0.92–1.02)

0.223

Colon, proximal

N cases

324

269

253

241

211

   

Basica

1.00 (Ref)

0.94 (0.80–1.12)

0.92 (0.76–1.10)

0.90 (0.74–1.09)

1.00 (0.80–1.24)

0.971

1.00 (0.93–1.08)

0.979

Multivariableb

1.00 (Ref)

0.96 (0.81–1.14)

0.94 (0.78–1.13)

0.93 (0.77–1.13)

1.04 (0.84–1.29)

0.692

1.02 (0.95–1.10)

0.631

Colon, distal

N cases

320

265

263

218

200

   

Basica

1.00 (Ref)

0.92 (0.78–1.09)

0.95 (0.79–1.13)

0.80 (0.66–0.98)

0.90 (0.72–1.12)

0.168

0.92 (0.86–0.99)

0.0308

Multivariableb

1.00 (Ref)

0.92 (0.78–1.09)

0.95 (0.79–1.14)

0.81 (0.66–0.99)

0.91 (0.74–1.14)

0.226

0.93 (0.86–1.00)

0.05

Rectum

N cases

442

351

335

295

225

   

Basica

1.00 (Ref)

1.00 (0.86–1.15)

1.06 (0.91–1.24)

1.01 (0.85–1.20)

0.92 (0.76–1.13)

0.616

0.97 (0.91–1.04)

0.376

Multivariableb

1.00 (Ref)

1.02 (0.88–1.18)

1.10 (0.93–1.28)

1.05 (0.89–1.25)

0.98 (0.80–1.19)

0.927

0.99 (0.93–1.06)

0.799

  1. Abbreviations: CI=confidence interval; CRC=colorectal cancer; HR=hazard ratio; PC=principal component; Ref=reference.
  2. aBasic model: Cox regression adjusted for total energy intake (log-transformed continuous variable) and for each score, and stratified by age (1-year categories), sex and centre.
  3. bMultivariable model: Cox regression adjusted for total energy intake (log-transformed continuous variable), alcohol (log-transformed continuous variable), smoking status (never, former, smoker, unknown), height (tertiles), weight (tertiles), physical activity level (inactive, moderately inactive, moderately active, active, missing) and for each score, and stratified by age (1-year categories), sex and centre.