Table 6 HRs (95% CI) for CRC and subsites by quintiles (Q) of PC4 score and for 1 s.d. increase in PC4 score

From: Main nutrient patterns and colorectal cancer risk in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition study

 

Q1

Q2

Q3

Q4

Q5

P -trend

HR (95% CI) per 1 s.d. increase

P -value HR continuous for 1 s.d. increase

Colorectum

N cases

831

860

923

931

972

   

Basica

1.00 (Ref)

0.97 (0.88–1.07)

0.99 (0.90–1.09)

0.94 (0.85–1.03)

0.94 (0.85–1.04)

0.172

0.98 (0.94–1.01)

0.155

Multivariableb

1.00 (Ref)

0.96 (0.87–1.05)

0.96 (0.88–1.06)

0.91 (0.82–1.00)

0.90 (0.81–0.99)

0.0192

0.96 (0.93–0.99)

0.015

Colon

N cases

517

563

591

587

611

   

Basica

1.00 (Ref)

1.01 (0.89–1.14)

0.99 (0.88–1.12)

0.92 (0.82–1.04)

0.92 (0.81–1.04)

0.076

0.97 (0.93–1.01)

0.12

Multivariableb

1.00 (Ref)

0.99 (0.88–1.12)

0.97 (0.86–1.10)

0.89 (0.79–1.01)

0.88 (0.77–1.00)

0.013

0.95 (0.91–0.99)

0.022

Colon, proximal

N cases

263

252

259

254

270

   

Basica

1.00 (Ref)

0.91 (0.77–1.09)

0.89 (0.75–1.07)

0.82 (0.68–0.98)

0.84 (0.70–1.01)

0.04

0.95 (0.89–1.01)

0.08

Multivariableb

1.00 (Ref)

0.91 (0.76–1.08)

0.88 (0.74–1.05)

0.80 (0.67–0.98)

0.81 (0.67–0.98)

0.014

0.93 (0.88–0.99)

0.03

Colon, distal

N cases

209

243

275

259

280

   

Basica

1.00 (Ref)

1.06 (0.88–1.28)

1.10 (0.91–1.32)

0.95 (0.78–1.15)

0.95 (0.78–1.16)

0.33

0.97 (0.91–1.03)

0.362

Multivariableb

1.00 (Ref)

1.03 (0.86–1.25)

1.06 (0.88–1.28)

0.91 (0.75–1.10)

0.90 (0.74–1.09)

0.115

0.95 (0.89–1.01)

0.125

Rectum

N cases

314

297

332

344

361

   

Basica

1.00 (Ref)

0.91 (0.78–1.07)

0.98 (0.84–1.15)

0.96 (0.82–1.13)

0.99 (0.84–1.16)

0.94

0.99 (0.94–1.05)

0.76

Multivariableb

1.00 (Ref)

0.89 (0.76–1.05)

0.95 (0.81–1.12)

0.93 (0.79–1.09)

0.93 (0.79–1.10)

0.531

0.97 (0.92–1.03)

0.307

  1. Abbreviations: CI=confidence interval; CRC=colorectal cancer; HR=hazard ratio; PC=principal component; Ref=reference.
  2. aBasic model: Cox regression adjusted for total energy intake (log-transformed continuous variable) and for each score, and stratified by age (1-year categories), sex and centre.
  3. bMultivariable model: Cox regression adjusted for total energy intake (log-transformed continuous variable), alcohol (log-transformed continuous variable), smoking status (never, former, smoker, unknown), height (tertiles), weight (tertiles), physical activity level (inactive, moderately inactive, moderately active, active, missing) and for each score, and stratified by age (1-year categories), sex and centre.