Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Allografting

Uptake and use of recommendations for the diagnosis, severity scoring and management of chronic GVHD: an international survey of the EBMT–NCI Chronic GVHD Task Force

Abstract

In 2005, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) consensus conference published a series of papers recommending methods to improve the conduct of clinical trials in chronic GVHD. Although the NIH recommendations were primarily aimed at strengthening research, several papers addressed issues relevant for clinical practice, particularly diagnosis, severity scoring, and ancillary and supportive care practices. We conducted an international survey to assess the uptake of these recommendations, identify barriers to greater use and document the use and perceived effectiveness of available treatments. The response rate for the American survey of 1387 practitioners was 21.8%, and it was 24.6% for 407 centers surveyed in Europe, Asia, Australia and Africa. Most respondents were familiar with the NIH consensus recommendations (94–96%) and used them in practice. Multiple barriers to greater use were reported. Besides lack of time (55–62%), unfamiliarity with the recommendations, scarcity of evidence supporting the impact of recommendations on outcomes, insufficient training/experience in chronic GVHD management and inaccessibility of subspecialists were also endorsed. Systemic corticosteroids were reported to be the most effective treatment for chronic GVHD, but many others were perceived to have moderate or great success. Therapeutic management of steroid-refractory chronic GVHD was identified as the highest priority for research.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Couriel D, Carpenter PA, Cutler C, Bolanos-Meade J, Treister NS, Gea-Banacloche J et al. Ancillary Therapy and Supportive Care of Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease: National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Project on Criteria for Clinical Trials in Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease: V. Ancillary Therapy and Supportive Care Working Group Report. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2006; 12: 375–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Filipovich AH, Weisdorf D, Pavletic S, Socie G, Wingard JR, Lee SJ et al. National Institutes of Health consensus development project on criteria for clinical trials in chronic graft-versus-host disease: I. Diagnosis and staging working group report. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2005; 11: 945–956.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Martin PJ, Weisdorf D, Przepiorka D, Hirschfeld S, Farrell A, Rizzo JD et al. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Project on Criteria for Clinical Trials in Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease: VI. Design of Clinical Trials Working Group Report. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2006; 12: 491–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Pavletic SZ, Martin P, Lee SJ, Mitchell S, Jacobsohn D, Cowen EW et al. Measuring Therapeutic Response in Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease: National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Project on Criteria for Clinical Trials in Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease: IV. Response Criteria Working Group Report. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2006; 12: 252–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Schultz KR, Miklos DB, Fowler D, Cooke K, Shizuru J, Zorn E et al. Toward biomarkers for chronic graft-versus-host disease: National Institutes of Health consensus development project on criteria for clinical trials in chronic graft-versus-host disease: III. Biomarker Working Group Report. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2006; 12: 126–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Shulman HM, Kleiner D, Lee SJ, Morton T, Pavletic SZ, Farmer E et al. Histopathologic diagnosis of chronic graft-versus-host disease: National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Project on Criteria for Clinical Trials in Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease: II. Pathology Working Group Report. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2006; 12: 31–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Arai S, Jagasia M, Storer B, Chai X, Pidala J, Cutler C et al. Global and organ-specific chronic graft-versus-host disease severity according to the 2005 NIH Consensus Criteria. Blood 2011; 118: 4242–4249.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Baird K, Steinberg SM, Grkovic L, Pulanic D, Cowen EW, Mitchell SA et al. National Institutes of Health chronic graft-versus-host disease staging in severely affected patients: organ and global scoring correlate with established indicators of disease severity and prognosis. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2013; 19: 632–639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jacobsohn DA, Kurland BF, Pidala J, Inamoto Y, Chai X, Palmer JM et al. Correlation between NIH composite skin score, patient-reported skin score, and outcome: results from the Chronic GVHD Consortium. Blood 2012; 120: 2545–2552.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kuzmina Z, Eder S, Bohm A, Pernicka E, Vormittag L, Kalhs P et al. Significantly worse survival of patients with NIH-defined chronic graft-versus-host disease and thrombocytopenia or progressive onset type: results of a prospective study. Leukemia 2012; 26: 746–756.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Greinix HT, Loddenkemper C, Pavletic SZ, Holler E, Socie G, Lawitschka A et al. Diagnosis and staging of chronic graft-versus-host disease in the clinical practice. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2010; 17: 167–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lee SJ, Vogelsang G, Gilman A, Weisdorf DJ, Pavletic S, Antin JH et al. A survey of diagnosis, management, and grading of chronic GVHD. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2002; 8: 32–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Appelbaum FR, Forman SJ, Negrin RS, Blume KG (eds).. Thomas’ Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation,4th edn. Wiley-Blackwell. : Hoboken, NJ, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wolff D, Gerbitz A, Ayuk F, Kiani A, Hildebrandt GC, Vogelsang GB et al. Consensus conference on clinical practice in chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD): first-line and topical treatment of chronic GVHD. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2010; 16: 1611–1628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wolff D, Schleuning M, von Harsdorf S, Bacher U, Gerbitz A, Stadler M et al. Consensus Conference on Clinical Practice in Chronic GVHD: second-line treatment of chronic graft-versus-host disease. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2011; 17: 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Arora M, Nagaraj S, Witte J, DeFor TE, MacMillan M, Burns LJ et al. New classification of chronic GVHD: added clarity from the consensus diagnoses. Bone Marrow Transplant 2009; 43: 149–153.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Jagasia M, Giglia J, Chinratanalab W, Dixon S, Chen H, Frangoul H et al. Incidence and outcome of chronic graft-versus-host disease using National Institutes of Health consensus criteria. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2007; 13: 1207–1215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lee SJ, Joffe S, Kim HT, Socie G, Gilman AL, Wingard JR et al. Physicians’ attitudes about quality-of-life issues in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Blood 2004; 104: 2194–2200.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Pidala J, Craig BM, Lee SJ, Majhail N, Quinn G, Anasetti C . Practice variation in physician referral for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 2013; 48: 63–67.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Pidala J, Lee SJ, Quinn G, Jim H, Kim J, Anasetti C . Variation in management of immune suppression after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2011; 17: 1528–1536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank all the participating practitioners and centers, CIBMTR for providing contact information for the American survey and the EBMT administrative office for their help with survey distribution to EBMT centers. The Center for Global Health provided support for the initial meeting of the EBMT-NCI Chronic GVHD Task Force. This work was in part supported by the Center for Cancer Research, the intramural program of the National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health. The Chronic GVHD Consortium (U54 CA163438) is a part of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Rare Diseases Clinical Research Network (RDCRN), supported through collaboration between the NIH Office of Rare Diseases Research (ORDR) at the National Center for Advancing Translational Science (NCATS), and the National Cancer Institute. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S J Lee.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

DW received a research grant from Novartis and Therakos, lecture fees from Fresenius and serves as consultant for Falk-Pharma. SJL was a consultant for Allergan. The other authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Duarte, R., Greinix, H., Rabin, B. et al. Uptake and use of recommendations for the diagnosis, severity scoring and management of chronic GVHD: an international survey of the EBMT–NCI Chronic GVHD Task Force. Bone Marrow Transplant 49, 49–54 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2013.129

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2013.129

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links