Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Viral Infection

Survey of CMV management in pediatric allogeneic HSCT programs, on behalf of the Inborn Errors, Infectious Diseases and Pediatric Diseases Working Parties of EBMT

Abstract

Human CMV infection is a frequent complication after HSC in children with remarkable morbidity and mortality. Antiviral drugs are relatively efficient but have numerous side effects. They are used as prophylactic, pre-emptive or therapeutic medicines. It is still a matter of debate which option is the best strategy. No uniform procedure has emerged regarding these three options, and new immunologic tools have raised more questions for physicians. To assess the current practice in the management of CMV infection, we sent a questionnaire to the EBMT centers performing hematopoietic SCT (HSCT) in children. Fifty-six out of 196 responded to the questionnaire (28.5%). Quantitative PCR was the most common monitoring tool (44/56). Only 4/56 centers use the pp65 antigenemia alone. All centers used pre-emptive strategy (56/56). 21/56 centers also used prophylactic measures, 13/21 after analysis of donor/receptor serologic status. Ganciclovir was the most common first-line agent for CMV disease (55/56). The most common dose and duration for induction treatment were 5 mg/kg bid (47/55) for 14 days (20/55). There is no uniform procedure for researching resistance strain, antiviral second-line therapy or cell therapy. A harmonization process should enable sound prospective trials to improve prevention, control and cure of CMV disease in children and adolescents.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Boeckh M, Nichols WG . The impact of cytomegalovirus serostatus of donor and recipient before hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in the era of antiviral prophylaxis and preemptive therapy. Blood 2004; 103: 2003–2008.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Broers AE, van Der Holt R, van Esser JW, Gratama JW, Henzen-Logmans S, Kuenen-Boumeester V et al. Increased transplant-related morbidity and mortality in CMV-seropositive patients despite highly effective prevention of CMV disease after allogeneic T-cell-depleted stem cell transplantation. Blood 2000; 95: 2240–2245.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Castagnola E, Cappelli B, Erba D, Rabagliati A, Lanino E, Dini G . Cytomegalovirus infection after bone marrow transplantation in children. Hum Immunol 2004; 65: 416–422.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ljungman P, Brand R, Einsele H, Frassoni F, Niederwieser D, Cordonnier C . Donor CMV serologic status and outcome of CMV-seropositive recipients after unrelated donor stem cell transplantation: an EBMT megafile analysis. Blood 2003; 102: 4255–4260.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ljungman P, Griffiths P, Paya C . Definitions of cytomegalovirus infection and disease in transplant recipients. Clin Infect Dis 2002; 34: 1094–1097.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Miller W, Flynn P, McCullough J, Balfour HH Jr., Goldman A, Haake R et al. Cytomegalovirus infection after bone marrow transplantation: an association with acute graft-v-host disease. Blood 1986; 67: 1162–1167.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Miller-Kittrell M, Sparer TE . Feeling manipulated: cytomegalovirus immune manipulation. Virol J 2009; 6: 4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Nichols WG, Corey L, Gooley T, Davis C, Boeckh M . High risk of death due to bacterial and fungal infection among cytomegalovirus (CMV)-seronegative recipients of stem cell transplants from seropositive donors: evidence for indirect effects of primary CMV infection. J Infect Dis 2002; 185: 273–282.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Baldanti F, Lilleri D, Gerna G . Human cytomegalovirus load measurement and its applications for pre-emptive therapy in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Hematol Oncol 2008; 26: 123–130.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Boeckh M, Ljungman P . How we treat cytomegalovirus in hematopoietic cell transplant recipients. Blood 2009; 113: 5711–5719.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Emery VC, Sabin CA, Cope AV, Gor D, Hassan-Walker AF, Griffiths PD . Application of viral-load kinetics to identify patients who develop cytomegalovirus disease after transplantation. Lancet 2000; 355: 2032–2036.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Pang XL, Fox JD, Fenton JM, Miller GG, Caliendo AM, Preiksaitis JK . Interlaboratory comparison of cytomegalovirus viral load assays. Am J Transplant 2009; 9: 258–268.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Boeckh M, Nichols WG, Papanicolaou G, Rubin R, Wingard JR, Zaia J . Cytomegalovirus in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients: current status, known challenges, and future strategies. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2003; 9: 543–558.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Matthes-Martin S, Lion T, Aberle SW, Fritsch G, Lawitschka A, Bittner B et al. Pre-emptive treatment of CMV DNAemia in paediatric stem cell transplantation: the impact of recipient and donor CMV serostatus on the incidence of CMV disease and CMV-related mortality. Bone Marrow Transplant 2003; 31: 803–808.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Zaia JA . Prevention of cytomegalovirus disease in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Clin Infect Dis 2002; 35: 999–1004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Zaia JA . Prevention and management of CMV-related problems after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 2002; 29: 633–638.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Griffiths P, Whitley R, Snydman DR, Singh N, Boeckh M . Contemporary management of cytomegalovirus infection in transplant recipients: guidelines from an IHMF workshop, 2007. Herpes 2008; 15: 4–12.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Canpolat C, Culbert S, Gardner M, Whimbey E, Tarrand J, Chan KW . Ganciclovir prophylaxis for cytomegalovirus infection in pediatric allogeneic bone marrow transplant recipients. Bone Marrow Transplant 1996; 17: 589–593.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Chou S . Cytomegalovirus UL97 mutations in the era of ganciclovir and maribavir. Rev Med Virol 2008; 18: 233–246.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ljungman P, Deliliers GL, Platzbecker U, Matthes-Martin S, Bacigalupo A, Einsele H et al. Cidofovir for cytomegalovirus infection and disease in allogeneic stem cell transplant recipients. The Infectious Diseases Working Party of the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Blood 2001; 97: 388–392.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ljungman P, Oberg G, Aschan J, Ehrnst A, Lonnqvist B, Pauksen K et al. Foscarnet for pre-emptive therapy of CMV infection detected by a leukocyte-based nested PCR in allogeneic bone marrow transplant patients. Bone Marrow Transplant 1996; 18: 565–568.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Meyers JD, Reed EC, Shepp DH, Thornquist M, Dandliker PS, Vicary CA et al. Acyclovir for prevention of cytomegalovirus infection and disease after allogeneic marrow transplantation. N Engl J Med 1988; 318: 70–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Sharland M, Luck S, Griffiths P, Cotton M . Antiviral therapy of CMV disease in children. Adv Exp Med Biol 2011; 697: 243–260.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Boeckh M . Complications, diagnosis, management, and prevention of CMV infections: current and future. Am Soc Hematol 2011; 2011: 305–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Feuchtinger T, Opherk K, Bethge WA, Topp MS, Schuster FR, Weissinger EM et al. Adoptive transfer of pp65-specific T cells for the treatment of chemorefractory cytomegalovirus disease or reactivation after haploidentical and matched unrelated stem cell transplantation. Blood 2010; 116: 4360–4367.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Guerin V, Dalle JH, Pedron B, Ouachee-Chardin M, Yakouben K, Baruchel A et al. Cellular immune parameters associated with spontaneous control of CMV in children who underwent transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 2010; 45: 442–449.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Peggs KS, Mackinnon S . Augmentation of virus-specific immunity after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation by adoptive T-cell therapy. Hum Immunol 2004; 65: 550–557.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Passweg JR, Baldomero H, Gratwohl A, Bregni M, Cesaro S, Dreger P et al. The EBMT activity survey: 1990-2010. Bone Marrow Transplant 2012; 47: 906–923.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Gimeno C, Solano C, Latorre JC, Hernandez-Boluda JC, Clari MA, Remigia MJ et al. Quantification of DNA in plasma by an automated real-time PCR assay (cytomegalovirus PCR kit) for surveillance of active cytomegalovirus infection and guidance of preemptive therapy for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. J Clin Microbiol 2008; 46: 3311–3318.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Kotton CN . Management of cytomegalovirus infection in solid organ transplantation. Nat Rev Nephrol 2010; 6: 711–721.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Marchetti S, Santangelo R, Manzara S, D'Onghia S, Fadda G, Cattani P . Comparison of real-time PCR and pp65 antigen assays for monitoring the development of Cytomegalovirus disease in recipients of solid organ and bone marrow transplants. N Microbiol 2011; 34: 157–164.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Fryer JF, Heath AB, Anderson R, Minor PD, WHOB Units, Group CS et al. Collaborative Study to Evaluate the Proposed 1st WHO International Standard for Human Cytomegalovirus (HCMV) for Nucleic Acid Amplification (NAT)-Based Assays. World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Avery RK, Adal KA, Longworth DL, Bolwell BJ . A survey of allogeneic bone marrow transplant programs in the United States regarding cytomegalovirus prophylaxis and pre-emptive therapy. Bone Marrow Transplant 2000; 26: 763–767.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Boeckh M, Gooley TA, Myerson D, Cunningham T, Schoch G, Bowden RA . Cytomegalovirus pp65 antigenemia-guided early treatment with ganciclovir versus ganciclovir at engraftment after allogeneic marrow transplantation: a randomized double-blind study. Blood 1996; 88: 4063–4071.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Crough T, Khanna R . Immunobiology of human cytomegalovirus: from bench to bedside. Clin Microbiol Rev 2009; 22: 76–98.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank all the participating centers: Alger CIC 703 (Algeria), Amman CIC 580 (Jordania), Ankara CIC 617 (Turkey), Antalya CIC 618 (Turkey), Barcelona CIC 422 (Spain), Bordeaux CIC 978 (France), Bratislava CIC 684 (Slovakia), Bruxelles CIC 234 (Belgium), Budapest CIC 824 (Hungria), Christchurch CIC 798 (New Zealand), Copenhagen CIC 206 (Denmark), Cracow CIC 507 (Poland), Dresden CIC 808 (Germany), Dublin CIC 774 (Ireland), Erlangen CIC 809-2 (Germany), Thessaloniki CIC 561 (Greece), Firenze (Italy), Frankfurt CIC 138 (Germany), Genova CIC 274 (Italy), GrazCIC 593 (Austria), Halle CIC 654 (Germany), Hanover CIC 295 (Germany), Helsinki CIC 219 (Finland), Idar-Oberstein CIC 592 (Germany), Kiel CIC 256:2 (Germany), Leeds CIC 254 (UK), Leiden CIC 203 (The Netherlands), Leuven CIC 209 (Belgium), Liverpool CIC 773 (UK), LyonCIC 806 (France), Malaga CIC 576 (Spain), Marseille CIC 192 (France), Milano CIC 813 (Italy), Monza CIC 279-1 (Italy), Moscow CIC 694 (Russia), Munich CIC 513-2 (Germany), Paris CIC 631 (France), Pescara CIC 248 (Italy), Petach-Tikva CIC 755 (Israel), Porto CIC 291 (Portugal), Pragha CIC 452.1 (Czech Republic), Reggio-Calbria CIC 587 (Italy), Riyadh CIC 397 (Saudi Arabia), Roma CIC 232 (Italy), Roma CIC 383(Italy), Rouen CIC 941 (France), Saint-Petersburg CIC 725 (Russia), Stockholm CIC 212 (Sweden), Sydney (Australia), Tartu CIC 742 (Estonia), Torino CIC 305 (Italy), Toulouse (France), Turku CIC 225 (Finland), Verona CIC 623 (Italy), Vienna CIC 528 (Austria), Vilnius CIC 508 (Lituania), Wroclaw CIC 817 (Poland).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J-H Dalle.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bontant, T., Sedlaçek, P., Balduzzi, A. et al. Survey of CMV management in pediatric allogeneic HSCT programs, on behalf of the Inborn Errors, Infectious Diseases and Pediatric Diseases Working Parties of EBMT. Bone Marrow Transplant 49, 276–279 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2013.164

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2013.164

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links