Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • CORRESPONDENCE

Eugenics history: university geneticists respond

By
  1. Andrew Pomiankowski

    1. University College London, UK.

  2. Mark G. Thomas

    1. University College London, UK.

  3. Steve Jones

    1. University College London, UK.

  4. Rosemary Ekong

    1. University College London, UK.

  5. Lucy van Dorp

    1. University College London, UK.

  6. Nikolas Maniatis

    1. University College London, UK.

  7. Nick Lane

    1. University College London, UK.

  8. Adam Rutherford

    1. University College London, UK.

  9. Catherine Walker

    1. University College London, UK.

  10. Dallas Swallow

    1. University College London, UK.

Access through your institution
Buy or subscribe

We wish to correct Angela Saini’s misleading claim that University College London’s geneticists were “willing to overlook” their department’s links with the Galton Laboratory, founded for research into eugenics in 1904 (Nature 579, 175; 2020). This undermines several decades of determined effort by us and our predecessors to confront the laboratory’s troubling history.

Access options

Access through your institution

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Learn more

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Nature 580, 321 (2020)

doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-01080-7

Subjects

Latest on:

Nature Careers

Jobs

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing

Search

Advanced search

Quick links