Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • ESSAY

The ‘quantum’ principle that says why atoms are as they are

From strange beginnings, the 100-year-old Pauli exclusion principle has become a gift that keeps on giving for scientists who aim to understand the workings of matter.
By
  1. Olival Freire Jr

    1. Olival Freire Jr is a professor of physics and the history of physics at the Federal University of Bahia, Brazil.

  2. Thiago Hartz

    1. Thiago Hartz is an assistant professor in the Mathematics Institute of the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

A rainbow-colored periodic table of the elements designed in the style of an irregular spiral, from the 1940s.

The Pauli exclusion principle determines the periodic relationships between the chemical elements — however they are depicted. Credit: Courtesy of Science History Institute

What makes matter stable? Why are atoms as they are? Why do different materials vary in their properties, such as electrical conductivity, density, melting temperature or light-absorption spectra?

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Learn more

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Nature 639, 296-299 (2025)

doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-025-00731-x

References

  1. Pauli, W. Z. Phys. 31, 765–783 (1925).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bohr, N. Lond. Edinb. Dublin Phil. Mag. J. Sci. 26, 1–25 (1913).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Duncan, A. & Janssen, M. Constructing Quantum Mechanics Vol. 1 & 2 (OUP, 2019 & 2023).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Enz, C. P. No Time to Be Brief (OUP, 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Heilbron, J. L. Hist. Stud. Phys. Sci. 13, 261–310 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dirac, P. A. M. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 114, 243–265 (1927).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Monaldi, D. in The Oxford Handbook of the History of Quantum Interpretations (ed. Friere, O.) 255–280 (OUP, 2022).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Pauli, W. Phys. Rev. 58, 716–722 (1940).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Borrelli, A. in Compendium of Quantum Physics (eds Greenberger, D., Hentschel, K. & Weinert, F.) 733–736 (Springer, 2009).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dyson, F. J. J. Math. Phys. 8, 1538–1545 (1967).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dyson, F. J. & Lenard, A. J. Math. Phys. 8, 423–434 (1967).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lieb, E. H. & Thirring, W. E. Phys. Rev. Lett. 35, 687–689 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Subjects

Latest on:

Nature Careers

Jobs

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing

Search

Advanced search

Quick links