Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • COMMENT

Why an overreliance on AI-driven modelling is bad for science

Without clear protocols to catch errors, artificial intelligence’s growing role in science could do more harm than good.
By
  1. Arvind Narayanan

    1. Arvind Narayanan is a computer scientist at Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.

  2. Sayash Kapoor

    1. Sayash Kapoor is a computer scientist at the Center for Information Technology Policy, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.

A stylised, futuristic illustration of a blue hand holding a glowing lab flask containing a DNA strand and a pink sphere and surrounded by an atom. It is set against a cosmic, science-themed background with geometric diagrams.

Illustration: Denis Freitas

Access through your institution
Buy or subscribe

The use of artificial intelligence (AI) is exploding across many branches of science. Between 2012 and 2022, the average proportion of scientific papers engaging with AI, across 20 fields, quadrupled (see ‘AI’s rise in research’), including economics, geology, political science and psychology1.

Access options

Access through your institution

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Learn more

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Nature 640, 312-314 (2025)

doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-025-01067-2

References

  1. Duede, E. et al. Preprint at arXiv https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2405.15828 (2024).

  2. Kapoor, S. & Narayanan, A. Patterns 4, 100804 (2024).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Roberts, M. et al. Nature Mach. Intell. 3, 199–217 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Breiman, L. Statist. Sci. 16, 199–231 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Messeri, L. & Crockett, M. J. Nature 627, 49–58 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kapoor, S. et al. Sci. Adv. 10, eadk3452 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Subjects

Latest on:

Nature Careers

Jobs

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing

Search

Advanced search

Quick links