Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • COMMENT

Carbon credits are failing to help with climate change — here’s why

Reforestation of an area destroyed by fires with tree guards protecting saplings near an old tree and mountains in the background.

Tree guards protect saplings in a reforestation project in Chile. Credit: Ashley Cooper/Nature Picture Library

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Nature 646, 543-546 (2025)

doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-025-03313-z

References

  1. Bradford, M. A. et al. Nature Sustain. 2, 1070–1072 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Archer, D. et al. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 37, 117–134 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Trencher, G., Nick, S., Carlson, J. & Johnson, M. Nature Commun. 15, 6863 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. World Bank Group. A Guide to Developing Domestic Carbon Crediting Mechanisms. Partnership for Market Readiness (World Bank, 2021).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Probst, B. S. et al. Nature Commun. 15, 9562 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. West, T. A. P. et al. Science 381, 873–877 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Calel, R., Colmer, J., Dechezleprêtre, A. & Glachant, M. Am. Econ. J. Appl. Econ. 17, 1–40 (2025).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gill-Wiehl, A., Kammen, D. M. & Haya, B. K. Nature Sustain. 7, 191–202 (2024).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Macintosh, A. et al. Rangel. J. 46, RJ24024 (2024).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Barbato, C. T. & Strong, A. L. npj Climate Action 2, 26 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Carbon Pricing Leadership Coalition. Report of the High-Level Commission on Carbon Prices (World Bank, 2017).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Merzian, R., Hemming, P. & Schoo, A. Questionable Integrity: Non-additionality in the Emissions Reduction Fund’s Avoided Deforestation Method (Australian Conservation Foundation, 2021).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water. ACCU Scheme Landfill Gas Method Reforms — Exposure Draft Supplementary Material (Commonwealth of Australia, 2025).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cullenward, D. & Burtraw, B. in 2024 Annual Report of the Independent Emissions Market Advisory Committee Ch. 7 (California Environmental Protection Agency, 2025).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Anderegg, W. R. L. et al. Nature 643, 1214–1222 (2025).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Supplementary Information

  1. Supplementary figure and table
  2. Supplementary table in editable format

Competing Interests

A.M. is a non-executive director of Paraway Pastoral Company Ltd. Paraway Pastoral Company Ltd has offset projects under Australia’s carbon offset scheme. S.B is chief climate scientist at Fortescue, a global metal mining company headquartered in Australia with facilities covered by the Australian Safeguard Mechanism. D.C. is a member of California’s Independent Emissions Market Advisory Committee and the UNFCCC Paris Agreement Article 6.4 mechanism’s Methodological Expert Panel. The views in this commentary are expressed in his personal capacity and do not represent either body.

Subjects

Latest on:

Nature Careers

Jobs

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing

Search

Quick links