Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Short Communication
  • Published:

Pharmacokinetics of daily versus monthly vitamin D3 supplementation in non-lactating women

Abstract

This study compared serum cholecalciferol and 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) concentrations over four weeks in healthy, non-pregnant, non-lactating females aged 18–40 years, who were randomized to oral cholecalciferol 5000 international units (IU) daily for 28 days or a single dose of 150 000 IU. The study was conducted in Rochester, MN in March and April of 2010. We found no difference in mean 25(OH)D between treatment groups on study day 0 or day 28 (P=0.14 and 0.28, respectively). The daily group had 11 more days of detectable serum cholecalciferol than the single-dose group (P<0.001). There was no difference observed in cholecalciferol area under the curve (AUC28) between groups (P=0.49). However, the single-dose group had a significantly greater mean 25(OH)D AUC28 compared with the daily group (P<0.001).

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bischoff-Ferrari HA, Kiel DP, Dawson-Hughes B, Orav JE, Ruifent L, Spiegelman D et al. Dietary calcium and serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D status in relation to BMD among U.S. adults. J Bone Miner Res 2009; 24: 935–942.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Chen P, Hu P, Xie D, Qin Y, Wang F, Wang H . Meta-analysis of vitamin D, calcium and the prevention of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2010; 121: 469–477.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Weisberg P, Scanlon KS, Li R, Cogswell ME . Nutritional rickets among children in the United States: review of cases reported between 1986 and 2003. Am J Clin Nutr 2004; 80 (6 Suppl), 1697S–1705S.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Wagner CL, Greer FR, American Academy of Pediatrics Section on Breastfeeding; American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Nutrition. Prevention of rickets and vitamin D deficiency in infants, children, and adolescents. Pediatrics 2008; 122: 1142–1152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ross AC, Taylor CL, Yaktine AL, Del Valle HB (eds). Dietary Reference Intakes for Calcium and Vitamin D. Food and Nutrition Board, Institutes of Medicine: Washington, DC, USA, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kovacs CS . Vitamin D in pregnancy and lactation: maternal, fetal, and neonatal outcomes from human and animal studies. Am J Clin Nutr 2008; 88: 520S–528S.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hollis BW, Wagner CL . Vitamin D requirements during lactation: high-dose maternal supplementation as therapy to prevent hypovitaminosis D for both the mother and the nursing infant. Am J Clin Nutr 2004; 80 (6 Suppl), 1752S–1758S.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Singh RJ . Quantitation of 25-OH-vitamin D (25OHD) using liquid tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS). Methods Mol Biol 2010; 603: 509–517.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ilahi M, Armas LA, Heaney RP . Pharmacokinetics of a single, large dose of cholecalciferol. Am J Clin Nutr 2008; 87: 688–691.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Heaney RP, Armas LA, Shary JR, Bell NH, Binkley N, Hollis BW . 25-Hydroxylation of vitamin D3: relation to circulating D3 under various input conditions. Am J Clin Nutr 2008; 87: 1738–1742.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This project was supported by NIH/NCRR CTSA Grant Number UL1 RR024150. Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH. This study was partially funded by a research grant from the Mayo Clinic Pharmacy Services Discretionary Fund.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M E Meekins.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Initial results of this study were presented at the poster sessions at the American Society for Nutrition (ASN) Advances and Controversies in Clinical Nutrition Conference held February 25–27, 2011 in San Francisco, CA.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Meekins, M., Oberhelman, S., Lee, B. et al. Pharmacokinetics of daily versus monthly vitamin D3 supplementation in non-lactating women. Eur J Clin Nutr 68, 632–634 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2013.278

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2013.278

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links