Abstract
Current knowledge about the incidence of chromosomal abnormalities in the general population comes from studies in newborns carried out in the 70s, before the era of widespread prenatal diagnosis. In the following years, data on frequency of chromosomal abnormalities in the second trimester of pregnancy have been used in conjunction with the data on the natural history of chromosomally abnormal fetuses to infer maternal age-specific rates of cytogenetic abnormalities in live-born infants. Starting from the data gathered in 1995–1996 from all Italian cytogenetic laboratories (with 92% compliance to the study), we have compared the frequency of chromosomal abnormalities at amniocentesis in cases with maternal age of ≥35 years (51 758 individuals) and cases with maternal age of <35 years (37 207 cases). The comparison confirmed the age-dependency of aneuploidies, whereas none of the structural abnormalities showed age-related differences. Furthermore, among the mosaic aneuploidies, trisomy 21 and 45,X/46,XX were found with a significantly higher incidence in older women. Chromosomal abnormalities that showed no significant difference between the two groups were summed for the overall national cohort, providing a general estimate of the incidence in the second trimester of pregnancy. The data provide critical background information for prenatal genetic counseling and for the planning of health care policy.
Similar content being viewed by others
Log in or create a free account to read this content
Gain free access to this article, as well as selected content from this journal and more on nature.com
or
References
Hook EB, Hamerton JL : The frequency of chromosome abnormalities detected in consecutive newborn studies; difference between studies; results by sex and severity of phenotypic involvement; in Hook EB, Porter IH (eds): Population Cytogenetics: Studies in Humans. New York: Academic Press, 1977, pp 63–79.
Benn PA, Hsu LYF : Prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal abnormalities through amniocentesis; in Milunsky A (ed): Genetic Disorders and the Fetus, 5th edn. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2004, pp 214–296.
Ferguson-Smith MA, Yates JR : Maternal age specific rates for chromosome aberrations and factors influencing them: report of a collaborative european study on 52 965 amniocenteses. Prenat Diagn 1984; 4 (Spec No): 5–44.
Hook EB, Cross PK, Schreinemachers DM : Chromosomal abnormality rates at amniocentesis and in live-born infants. JAMA 1983; 249: 2034–2038.
Wapner R, Thom E, Simpson JL et al: First-trimester screening for trisomies 21 and 18. N Engl J Med 2003; 349: 1405–1413.
Benn PA, Egan JF, Fang M, Smith-Bindman R : Changes in the utilization of prenatal diagnosis. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 103: 1255–1260.
Dallapiccola B, Torrente I, Morena A, Dagna-Bricarelli F, Mingarelli1 R : Genetic testing in Italy, year 2004. Eur J Hum Genet 2006; 14: 911–916.
Santucci S, Ranzi A, D’Ippolito C, Spagnolo A, Forabosco A : Indagine sulla diagnosi citogenetica prenatale in Italia: anni 1995–1996; in Dallapiccola B, Forabosco A, Mazzotti G, Spagnolo A (eds): Rapporti ISTISAN 98/20 1998, pp 37–57.
Associazione Italiana Citogenetica Medica (AICM): Diagnostica citogenetica – consensus 1995. Analysis 1995; 8: 1–20.
Hsu LY, Kaffe S, Jenkins EC et al: Proposed guidelines for diagnosis of chromosome mosaicism in amniocytes based on data derived from chromosome mosaicism and pseudomosaicism studies. Prenat Diagn 1992; 12: 555–573.
ISCN: Report of the Standing Committee on human cytogenetic nomenclature. Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser 1985; 21: 1–117.
ISCN: An international system for human cytogenetic nomenclature (1995); Mitelman F (ed): Basel: S Karger, 1995.
Warburton D : De novo balanced chromosome rearrangements and extra marker chromosomes identified at prenatal diagnosis: clinical significance and distribution of breakpoints. Am J Hum Genet 1991; 49: 995–1013.
Shaffer LG, Bui TH : Molecular cytogenetic and rapid aneuploidy detection methods in prenatal diagnosis. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet 2007; 145: 87–98.
Gosden R, Trasler J, Lucifero D, Faddy M : Rare congenital disorders, imprinted genes, and assisted reproductive technology. Lancet 2003; 361: 1975–1977.
Robinson WP, Binkert F, Bernasconi F, Lorda-Sanchez I, Werder EA, Schinzel AA : Molecular studies of chromosomal mosaicism: relative frequency of chromosome gain or loss and possible role of cell selection. Am J Hum Genet 1995; 56: 444–451.
Uematsu A, Yorifuji T, Muroi J et al: Parental origin of normal X chromosomes in Turner syndrome patients with various karyotypes: implications for the mechanism leading to generation of a 45,X karyotype. Am J Med Genet 2002; 111: 134–139.
Van Dyke DL, Weiss L, Roberson JR, Babu VR : The frequency and mutation rate of balanced autosomal rearrangements in man estimated from prenatal genetic studies for advanced maternal age. Am J Hum Genet 1983; 35: 301–308.
Jacobs PA, Browne C, Gregson N, Joyce C, White H : Estimates of the frequency of chromosome abnormalities detectable in unselected newborns using moderate levels of banding. J Med Genet 1992; 29: 103–108.
Yurov YB, Vorsanova SG, Iourov IY et al: Unexplained autism is frequently associated with low-level mosaic aneuploidy. J Med Genet 2007; 44: 521–525.
Liehr T, Weise A : Frequency of small supernumerary marker chromosomes in prenatal, newborn, developmentally retarded and infertility diagnostics. Int J Mol Med 2007; 19: 719–731.
Shannon NL, Maltby EL, Rigby AS, Quarrell OW : An epidemiological study of Wolf-Hirschhorn syndrome: life expectancy and cause of mortality. J Med Genet 2001; 38: 674–679.
Cerruti Mainardi P, Pastore G, Castronovo C et al: The natural history of Cri du Chat Syndrome. a report from the Italian Register. Eur J Med Genet 2006; 49: 363–383.
Stankiewicz P, Lupski JR : Genome architecture, rearrangements and genomic disorders. Trends Genet 2002; 18: 74–82.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Forabosco, A., Percesepe, A. & Santucci, S. Incidence of non-age-dependent chromosomal abnormalities: a population-based study on 88965 amniocenteses. Eur J Hum Genet 17, 897–903 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/ejhg.2008.265
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ejhg.2008.265
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
Effect of advanced parental age on pregnancy outcome and offspring health
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics (2022)
-
The spectrum of chromosomal translocations in the Arab world: ethnic-specific chromosomal translocations and their relevance to diseases
Chromosoma (2022)
-
The correlation between maternal age and fetal sex chromosome aneuploidies: a 8-year single institution experience in China
Molecular Cytogenetics (2021)
-
A metabolomics-based approach for non-invasive diagnosis of chromosomal anomalies
Metabolomics (2017)
-
Enlarged NT (≥3.5 mm) in the first trimester – not all chromosome aberrations can be detected by NIPT
Molecular Cytogenetics (2016)
