Abstract
Respecting the confidentiality of personal data contributed to genomic studies is an important issue for researchers using genomic sequencing in humans. Although most studies adhere to rules of confidentiality, there are different conceptions of confidentiality and why it is important. The resulting ambiguity obscures what is at stake when making tradeoffs between data protection and other goals in research, such as transparency, reciprocity, and public benefit. Few studies have examined why participants in genomic research care about how their information is used. To explore this topic, we conducted semi-structured phone interviews with 30 participants in two National Institutes of Health research protocols using genomic sequencing. Our results show that research participants value confidentiality as a form of control over information about themselves. To the individuals we interviewed, control was valued as a safeguard against discrimination in a climate of uncertainty about future uses of individual genome data. Attitudes towards data sharing were related to the goals of research and details of participants’ personal lives. Expectations of confidentiality, trust in researchers, and a desire to advance science were common reasons for willingness to share identifiable data with investigators. Nearly, all participants were comfortable sharing personal data that had been de-identified. These findings suggest that views about confidentiality and data sharing are highly nuanced and are related to the perceived benefits of joining a research study.
Similar content being viewed by others
Log in or create a free account to read this content
Gain free access to this article, as well as selected content from this journal and more on nature.com
or
References
Lin Z, Owen AB, Altman RB : Genetics. Genomic research and human subject privacy. Science 2004; 305: 183.
Anderlik MR, Rothstein MA : Privacy and confidentiality of genetic information: what rules for the new science? Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 2001; 2: 401–433.
Anderlik MR, Rothstein MA : Privacy and confidentiality of genetic information: what rules for the new science? Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 2001; 2: 401–433.
Johnson S, Kass NE, Natowicz M : Disclosure of personal medical information: differences among parents and affected adults for genetic and nongenetic conditions. Genetic Testing 2005; 9: 269–280.
Heeney C, Hawkins N, de Vries J, Boddington P, Kaye J : Assessing the privacy risks of data sharing in genomics. Public Health Genomics 2011; 14: 17–25.
Facio FM, Sapp JC, Linn A, Biesecker LG : Approaches to informed consent for hypothesis-testing and hypothesis-generating clinical genomics research. BMC Med Genomics 2012; 5: 45.
Gymrek M, McGuire AL, Golan D, Halperin E, Erlich Y : Identifying personal genomes by surname inference. Science 2013; 339: 321–324.
Tabor HK, Berkman BE, Hull SC, Bamshad MJ : Genomics really gets personal: how exome and whole genome sequencing challenge the ethical framework of human genetics research. Am J Med Genetics A 2011; 155A: 2916–2924.
Biesecker LG, Mullikin JC, Facio FM et al: The ClinSeq Project: piloting large-scale genome sequencing for research in genomic medicine. Genome Res 2009; 19: 1665–1674.
Sapp J, Dong D, Stark C et al: Parental attitudes, values, and beliefs toward the return of results from exome sequencing in children. Clin Genet 2013, e-pub ahead of print 20 August 2013 doi:10.1111/cge.12254.
Bradley EH, Curry LA, Devers KJ : Qualitative data analysis for health services research: developing taxonomy, themes, and theory. Health Serv Res 2007; 42: 1758–1772.
Hayden EC : Geneticists push for global data-sharing. Nature 2013; 498: 16–17.
Katsnelson A : Delays in updates to ethics guidelines for research spark concern. Nature Med 2013; 19: 511.
Carinci F, Di Iorio CT, Ricciardi W, Klazinga N, Verschuuren M : Revision of the European Data Protection Directive: opportunity or threat for public health monitoring? Eur J Public Health 2011; 21: 684–685.
Coppieters Y, Leveque A : Ethics, privacy and the legal framework governing medical data: opportunities or threats for biomedical and public health research? Arch Public Health 2013; 71: 15.
Tabor HK, Stock J, Brazg T et al: Informed consent for whole genome sequencing: a qualitative analysis of participant expectations and perceptions of risks, benefits, and harms. Am J Med Genetics A 2012; 158A: 1310–1319.
Lemke AA, Wolf WA, Hebert-Beirne J, Smith ME : Public and biobank participant attitudes toward genetic research participation and data sharing. Public Health Genomics 2010; 13: 368–377.
Ludman EJ, Fullerton SM, Spangler L et al: Glad you asked: participants' opinions of re-consent for dbGap data submission. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 2010; 5: 9–16.
Hobbs A, Starkbaum J, Gottweis U, Wichmann HE, Gottweis H : The privacy-reciprocity connection in biobanking: comparing German with UK strategies. Public Health Genomics 2012; 15: 272–284.
Kaufman DJ, Murphy-Bollinger J, Scott J, Hudson KL : Public opinion about the importance of privacy in biobank research. Am J Hum Genet 2009; 85: 643–654.
Trinidad SB, Fullerton SM, Bares JM et al: Genomic research and wide data sharing: views of prospective participants. Genet Med 2010; 12: 486–495.
Terry SF, Shelton R, Biggers G, Baker D, Edwards K : The haystack is made of needles. Genet Testing Mol Biomarkers 2013; 17: 175–177.
Trakadis YJ : Patient-controlled encrypted genomic data: an approach to advance clinical genomics. BMC Med Genomics 2012; 5: 31.
O'Doherty KC, Burgess MM, Edwards K et al: From consent to institutions: designing adaptive governance for genomic biobanks. Social Sci Med 2011; 73: 367–374.
Kaye J : The tension between data sharing and the protection of privacy in genomics research. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 2012; 13: 415–431.
Kuehn BM : Groups experiment with digital tools for patient consent. JAMA 2013; 310: 678–680.
Salari K, Karczewski KJ, Hudgins L, Ormond KE : Evidence that personal genome testing enhances student learning in a course on genomics and personalized medicine. PLoS One 2013; 8: e68853.
Acknowledgements
We thank the participants in this study, Lauren Ivey and Toby Emanuel for coordinating the interviews, and Nancy Kass for reviewing an earlier version of this manuscript.The Intramural Research Program of the National Human Genome Research Institute funded this research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
LJ, JCS, KL, TY, FF, and BBB declare no conflicts of interest. LGB is an uncompensated adviser to Illumina Corporation and receives royalties from Genentech.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jamal, L., Sapp, J., Lewis, K. et al. Research participants’ attitudes towards the confidentiality of genomic sequence information. Eur J Hum Genet 22, 964–968 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/ejhg.2013.276
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ejhg.2013.276
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
All you Need it Trust? Public Perspectives on Consenting to Participate in Genomic Research in the Sri Lankan District of Colombo
Asian Bioethics Review (2023)
-
Controlling my genome with my smartphone: first clinical experiences of the PROMISE system
Clinical Research in Cardiology (2022)
-
Sharing genomic data from clinical testing with researchers: public survey of expectations of clinical genomic data management in Queensland, Australia
BMC Medical Ethics (2020)
-
The survey of public perception and general knowledge of genomic research and medicine in Japan conducted by the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development
Journal of Human Genetics (2019)
-
Attitudes of blood donors to their sample and data donation for biobanking
European Journal of Human Genetics (2019)
