Abstract
To encourage the process of harmonization, the biobank community should support and use a common terminology. Relevant terms may be found in general thesauri for medicine, legal instruments or specific glossaries for biobanking. A comparison of the use of these sources has so far not been conducted and would be a useful instrument to further promote harmonization and data sharing. Thus, the purpose of the present study was to investigate the preference of definitions important for sharing biological samples and data. Definitions for 10 terms –[human] biobank, sample/specimen, sample collection, study, aliquot, coded, identifying information, anonymised, personal data and informed consent–were collected from several sources. A web-based questionnaire was sent to 560 European individuals working with biobanks asking to select their preferred definition for the terms. A total of 123 people participated in the survey, giving a response rate of 23%. The result was evaluated from four aspects: scope of definitions, potential regional differences, differences in semantics and definitions in the context of ontologies, guided by comments from responders. Indicative from the survey is the risk of focusing only on the research aspect of biobanking in definitions. Hence, it is recommended that important terms should be formulated in such a way that all areas of biobanking are covered to improve the bridges between research and clinical application. Since several of the terms investigated here within can also be found in a legal context, which may differ between countries, establishing what is a proper definition on how it adheres to law is also crucial.
Similar content being viewed by others
Log in or create a free account to read this content
Gain free access to this article, as well as selected content from this journal and more on nature.com
or
References
Shendure J, Ji H : Next-generation DNA sequencing. Nat Biotechnol 2008; 26: 1135–1145.
Martin JA, Wang Z : Next-generation transcriptome assembly. Nat Rev Genet 2011; 12: 671–682.
Yuille M, van Ommen GJ, Brechot C et al: Biobanking for Europe. Brief Bioinform 2008; 9: 14–24.
Harris JR, Burton P, Knoppers BM et al: Toward a roadmap in global biobanking for health. Eur J Hum Genet 2012; 20: 1105–1111.
Wichmann HE, Kuhn KA, Waldenberger M et al: Comprehensive catalog of European biobanks. Nat Biotechnol 2011; 29: 795–797.
Norlin L, Fransson MN, Eriksson M et al: A minimum data set for sharing biobank samples, information, and data: MIABIS. Biopreserv Biobank 2012; 10: 343–348.
Knoppers BM, Saginur M : The Babel of genetic data terminology. Nat Biotechnol 2005; 23: 925–927.
Rogers FB : Medical subject headings. Bull Med Libr Assoc 1963; 51: 114–116.
Sioutos N, Sd Coronado, Haber MW et al: A semantic model integrating cancer-related clinical and molecular information. J Biomed Inform 2007; 40: 30–43.
The European Parliament and the Council of the European Union (1995). Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council. Available http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:31995L0046:EN:NOT currently under revision, to be turned into a Regulation http://ec.europa.eu/justice/data-protection/ . Accessed 10 December 2013..
Public Population Project in Genomics and Society. Lexicon. Available at http://www.p3gobservatory.org/lexicon/list.htm . Accessed on 20 February 2013.
International Society for Biological and Environmental Repositories (ISBER): Collection, storage, retrieval and distribution of biological materials for research. Cell Preserv Technol 2008; 6: 3–58.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2009) OECD Guidelines for Human Biobanks and Genetic Research Databases. Paris. Available at http://www.oecd.org/science/biotech/44054609.pdf . Accessed on 20 February 2013.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2006) Creation and Governance of Human Genetic Research Databases. Paris.
Biobanking and Biomolecular Resources Research Infrastructure (BBMRI) (2012) Statutes for the Biobanking and Biomolecular Resources Research Infrastructure - European Research Infrastructure Consortium (BBMRI-ERIC). Available at http://www.meduni07.edis.at/files/draft_bbmri_statutes_clean.pdf . Accessed on 20 February 2013..
Deutscher Ethikrat (2010) Human biobanks for research. Berlin. Available at http://www.ethikrat.org/files/der_opinion_human-biobanks.pdf . Accessed on 2 April 2013..
Swedish Association of Local Authorities and Regions (2011) Glossary (In Swedish). Available at http://www.biobanksverige.se/getDocument.aspx?id=50 .Accessed on 20 February 2013..
Oxford English Dictionary (2013) Available at http://www.oed.com/viewdictionaryentry/Entry/36275 . Accessed on 20 February 2013..
EuroBioBank. Available at http://www.eurobiobank.org/en/information/glossary.htm . Accessed on 15 January 2013.
Riegman PHJ, Morente MM, Betsou F, de Blasio P, Geary P : Biobanking for better healthcare. Mol Oncol 2008; 2: 213–222.
Norweigan Ministry of Health and Care Services (2008) Lov om medisinsk og helsefaglig forskning. Available at http://www.lovdata.no/all/tl-20080620-044-001.html#4 . Accessed on 15 January 2013..
Expert group of the European Commission (2012) Biobanks for Europe, a challenge for governance. Available at http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/document_library/pdf_06/biobanks-for-europe_en.pdf . Accessed on 25 June 2013..
The European Commission (2012) Proposal for a new regulation COM(2012) 11 final, 2012/0011 (COD). Accessed on 25 June 2013. To follow up on the revision process see http://ec.europa.eu/justice/data-protection/.
Brochhausen M, Fransson MN, Kanaskar NV et al: Developing a semantically rich ontology for the biobank-administration domain. J Biomed Semantics 2013; 4: 23.
Smith B : From concepts to clinical reality: an essay on the benchmarking of biomedical terminologies. J Biomed Inform 2006; 39: 288–298.
Smith B, Ceusters W : Ontological realism: a methodology for coordinated evolution of scientific ontologies. Appl Ontol 2010; 5: 139–188.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank all the responders who took their time to help us with this survey and the Swedish Research Council for granting the BBMRI.se project (grant agreement 829-2009-6285).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fransson, M., Rial-Sebbag, E., Brochhausen, M. et al. Toward a common language for biobanking. Eur J Hum Genet 23, 22–28 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/ejhg.2014.45
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ejhg.2014.45
This article is cited by
-
History of the largest global biobanks, ethical challenges, registration, and biological samples ownership
Journal of Public Health (2023)
-
The biobank of barretos cancer hospital: 14 years of experience in cancer research
Cell and Tissue Banking (2022)
-
Aspects of Modern Biobank Activity – Comprehensive Review
Pathology & Oncology Research (2018)
-
OBIB-a novel ontology for biobanking
Journal of Biomedical Semantics (2016)
-
Biobanks in the era of personalized medicine: objectives, challenges, and innovation
EPMA Journal (2015)
