Table 2 Summary of multidimensional measure of informed choice

From: Development and validation of a measure of informed choice for women undergoing non-invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy

Measure

Description

Items

Reliability a

Range

Cutoff

Mean (SD)

Outcome

Knowledge scale

Knowledge of NIPT, how it compares with standard DSS, options if the NIPT result is positive, knowledge about Down syndrome

12 questions, multiple choice answers

0.69

0–12

≥9=good knowledge

11.1 (1.5)

Good knowledge: 95%

Attitude scale

Attitude towards having NIPT

Five 5-point Likert items

0.94

0–20

0–6=positive

7–13=neutral

14–20=negative

2.2 (3.7)

Positive: 88%

Negative: 2%

Neutral: 10%

Deliberation scale

Evaluating alternatives, considering consequences, weighing up pros and cons

Six 5-point Likert items

0.84

0–24

0–12=deliberated

5.2 (5.0)

Deliberated: 92%

Uptake

Whether NIPT was accepted or declined

Choice of 4 options: NIPT, no further testing, straight for invasive, invasive and NIPT

—

—

—

—

NIPT: 94%

NIPT and invasive: 4%

No further testing: 2%

Informed choiceb

Good knowledge, deliberated, attitude and behaviour match.

Calculated

—

—

—

—

Informed choice: 89% inc. deliberation

94% excl. deliberation

  1. Abbreviation: DSS, Down syndrome screening.
  2. aReliability was assessed using Cronbach’s alpha.
  3. bCalculation does not include women with a neutral attitude.