Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Genetics in Medicine
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • Log in
  • Content Explore content
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. genetics in medicine
  3. original article
  4. article
Detection of Mosaicism in amniotic fluid cultures: A CYT02000 collaborative study
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Original Article
  • Published: 01 March 1999

Detection of Mosaicism in amniotic fluid cultures: A CYT02000 collaborative study

  • Paul S Ing1,
  • Daniel L Van Dyke2,
  • Samuel P Caudill3,
  • John A Reidy3,
  • Gillian Bice4,
  • Frederick R Bieber5,
  • Phillip D Buchanan6,
  • Andrew J Carroll7,
  • Sau W Cheung8,
  • Gordon Dewald9,
  • Roger P Donahue10,
  • H Allen Gardner11,
  • James Higgins12,
  • Lillian Ye Hsu13,
  • Mehdi Jamehdor14,
  • Elisabeth A Keitges15,
  • Caroline H Laundon6,
  • Frederick W Luthardt15,
  • James Mascarello16,
  • Kristin M May17,
  • Jeanne M Meck18,
  • Cynthia Morton5,
  • Shiva Patil19,
  • David Peakman20,
  • Mark J Pettenati21,
  • Nagesh Rao22 nAff30,
  • Warren G Sanger23,
  • Deborah F Saxe17,
  • Stuart Schwartz24,
  • Gurbax S Sekhon25,
  • Gail H Vance26,
  • Herman E Wyandt27,
  • Cheng W Yu28,
  • Julie Zenger-Hain29 &
  • …
  • Andrew T L. Chen3 

Genetics in Medicine volume 1, pages 94–97 (1999)Cite this article

  • 2151 Accesses

  • Metrics details

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the assumptions on which the American College of Medical Genetics (ACMG) Standards and Guidelines for detecting mosaicism in amniotic fluid cultures are based.

Methods: Data from 653 cases of amniotic fluid mosaicism were collected from 26 laboratories. A chi-square goodness-of-fit test was used to compare the observed number of mosaic cases with the expected number based on binomial distribution theory.

Results: Comparison of observed data from the in situ colony cases with the expected distribution of cases detected based on the binomial distribution did not reveal a significant difference (P = 0.525).

Conclusions: The empirical data fit the binomial distribution. Therefore, binomial theory can be used as an initial discussion point for determining whether ACMG Standards and Guidelines are adequate for detecting mosaicism.

Similar content being viewed by others

Isolation and characterization of human cKIT positive amniotic fluid stem cells obtained from pregnancies with spina bifida

Article Open access 06 June 2025

Amniotic fluid: its role in fetal development and beyond

Article 08 May 2025

Karyotype analysis of amniotic fluid cells and report of chromosomal abnormalities in 15,401 cases of Iranian women

Article Open access 30 September 2021

Article PDF

Author information

Author notes
  1. Nagesh Rao

    Present address: University California, Los Angeles

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Boys Town National Research Hospital, Omaha, Nebraska

    Paul S Ing

  2. Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan

    Daniel L Van Dyke

  3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia

    Samuel P Caudill, John A Reidy & Andrew T L. Chen

  4. Michigan State University, East Lansing

    Gillian Bice

  5. Brigham and Women's Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts

    Frederick R Bieber & Cynthia Morton

  6. GeneCare Medical Genetics Center, Chapel Hill, North Carolina

    Phillip D Buchanan & Caroline H Laundon

  7. University of Alabama, Birmingham

    Andrew J Carroll

  8. Laboratories for Genetic Services, Inc., Houston, Texas

    Sau W Cheung

  9. Mayo Clinics, Rochester, Minnesota

    Gordon Dewald

  10. University of Miami, Florida

    Roger P Donahue

  11. Oshawa General Hospital, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada

    H Allen Gardner

  12. Butterworth Hospital, Grand Rapids, Michigan

    James Higgins

  13. Prenarutal Dragnosis Laboratories of New York City,

    Lillian Ye Hsu

  14. Southern California Permanente, Los Angeles, California

    Mehdi Jamehdor

  15. Dynacare, Seattle, Washington

    Elisabeth A Keitges & Frederick W Luthardt

  16. Children's Hospital, San Diego, California

    James Mascarello

  17. Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia

    Kristin M May & Deborah F Saxe

  18. Georgetown Universrty, Washington, DC

    Jeanne M Meck

  19. University of lowa, lowa City

    Shiva Patil

  20. Reproductive Genetics Center, PC, Denver, Colorado

    David Peakman

  21. Bowman Gray School of Medicine,

    Mark J Pettenati

  22. Bowman Gray School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina

    Nagesh Rao

  23. University of Nebraska, Omaha

    Warren G Sanger

  24. Case Western Reserve University, Clevelund, Ohio

    Stuart Schwartz

  25. University of Wisconsin, Madison

    Gurbax S Sekhon

  26. Indiana University, Indiana

    Gail H Vance

  27. Boston University School of Medicine, Massachusetts

    Herman E Wyandt

  28. University of Mississippi, Jackson

    Cheng W Yu

  29. Oakwood Hospital, Dearborn, Michigan

    Julie Zenger-Hain

Authors
  1. Paul S Ing
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Daniel L Van Dyke
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Samuel P Caudill
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. John A Reidy
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Gillian Bice
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Frederick R Bieber
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Phillip D Buchanan
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Andrew J Carroll
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Sau W Cheung
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Gordon Dewald
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Roger P Donahue
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  12. H Allen Gardner
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  13. James Higgins
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Lillian Ye Hsu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Mehdi Jamehdor
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Elisabeth A Keitges
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Caroline H Laundon
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  18. Frederick W Luthardt
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  19. James Mascarello
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  20. Kristin M May
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  21. Jeanne M Meck
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  22. Cynthia Morton
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  23. Shiva Patil
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  24. David Peakman
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  25. Mark J Pettenati
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  26. Nagesh Rao
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  27. Warren G Sanger
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  28. Deborah F Saxe
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  29. Stuart Schwartz
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  30. Gurbax S Sekhon
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  31. Gail H Vance
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  32. Herman E Wyandt
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  33. Cheng W Yu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  34. Julie Zenger-Hain
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  35. Andrew T L. Chen
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ing, P., Van Dyke, D., Caudill, S. et al. Detection of Mosaicism in amniotic fluid cultures: A CYT02000 collaborative study. Genet Med 1, 94–97 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1097/00125817-199903000-00006

Download citation

  • Issue date: 01 March 1999

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00125817-199903000-00006

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • prenatal diagnosis
  • cytogenetics
  • chromosomal mosaicism
  • guidelines
  • binomial distribution
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Current issue
  • Collections
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Genetics in Medicine (Genet Med)

ISSN 1530-0366 (online)

ISSN 1098-3600 (print)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2025 Springer Nature Limited