Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Genetics in Medicine
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • Log in
  • Content Explore content
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. genetics in medicine
  3. abstracts
  4. article
Newborn screening for sickle cell disease: assessing program effectiveness
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Abstracts
  • Published: 01 January 2000

Abstract

Newborn screening for sickle cell disease: assessing program effectiveness

  • S S Wang1,
  • R Olne2,
  • K Harris3,
  • K Pass3,
  • F Lorey4,
  • R Choi4,
  • S Kling5,
  • C Moore2 &
  • …
  • M J Khoury1 

Genetics in Medicine volume 2, page 67 (2000)Cite this article

  • 246 Accesses

  • Metrics details

Abstract

Children affected with sickle cell disease (SCD) are at increased risk for morbidity and mortality, especially in the first three years of life. Newborn screening programs for SCD currently operate in over 40 states. To assess the effectiveness of newborn screening in providing early medical interventions and in reducing morbidity and mortality, a three-year follow-up study was conducted in 1998 in three states (California, Illinois, and New York), where universal newborn screening for SCD is offered.

1042 children born in 1992 and 1993 were diagnosed with SCD in California (n=265), Illinois (n=254), and New York (n=523). 61% (n=634) of children were diagnosed with SS disease, and 32% with SC disease (n=328). Of children born and diagnosed with SCD in 1992 and 1993, fourteen were deceased at the time of the study. A parental survey and provider survey were administered for each child to examine genetic factors, medical care and compliance, and sociodemographic factors. Provider surveys were completed for 72% (n=752) of the children and parental surveys were completed for 24% (n=252) of the children. Data from both surveys were merged; both parental and provider surveys were completed for 18% (n=184) of the children. Preliminary results indicate that 44% of respondents were informed of SCD services available for their child with 27% having utilized these services. Penicillin was taken regularly by 93% of respondents; 75% had received pneumonia vaccine or pneumovax, and 65% had received a full series of HIB/tetramune. Finally, 44% of SCD children reported compliance with prophylactic antibiotic regimen. Associations of these and other factors with various morbidity measures are currently being assessed in the entire population as well as by state.

This study utilized two methods for ascertaining follow-up and made repeated attempts to locate the children. Poor response rates for both provider and parental surveys demonstrate the need for on-going systematic collection of follow-up data on children with sickle cell disease to identify the extent and gaps of delivering proper medical services and interventions.

Article PDF

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Office of Genetics and Disease Prevention, CDC, Atlanta, GA

    S S Wang & M J Khoury

  2. Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, CDC, Atlanta, GA

    R Olne & C Moore

  3. Wadsworth Center Albany, New York

    K Harris & K Pass

  4. California Department of Health Services, Berkeley

    F Lorey & R Choi

  5. Illinois Department of Public Health, Springfield

    S Kling

Authors
  1. S S Wang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. R Olne
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. K Harris
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. K Pass
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. F Lorey
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. R Choi
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. S Kling
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. C Moore
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. M J Khoury
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wang, S., Olne, R., Harris, K. et al. Newborn screening for sickle cell disease: assessing program effectiveness. Genet Med 2, 67 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1097/00125817-200001000-00067

Download citation

  • Issue date: 01 January 2000

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00125817-200001000-00067

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Current issue
  • Collections
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Genetics in Medicine (Genet Med)

ISSN 1530-0366 (online)

ISSN 1098-3600 (print)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2025 Springer Nature Limited