Table 2 Summary of diagnoses and detection methods in the 454 diagnosed probands

From: Making new genetic diagnoses with old data: iterative reanalysis and reporting from genome-wide data in 1,133 families with developmental disorders

Variant type

Analysis method

No. of diagnoses

Chromosomal aneuploidy

Chromosome read-depth counter

2

Copy-number variants

CNsolidate/CoNVex/CIPHER

50

De novo SNVs/indels in known genes

DeNovoGear

232

De novo SNVs/indels in new DDD genes

DeNovoGear/Discovery

58

De novo SNVs/indels in new external genes

DeNovoGear/DDD Research Variant Track

5

De novo indels in known genes

GATK candidate de novo variant

4

Inherited SNVs/indels in known genes

GATK Mendelian filter

82

Inherited SNVs/indels in new DDD genes

GATK Mendelian filter/Discovery

4

Large insertions/deletions

Soft-clipped reads

4

Mosaic structural variants

triPOD

5

Mosaic inherited SNVs/indels

Parental mosaicism

4

Nonessential splice variants

Splicing analysis

4

Uniparental disomy

UPDio

6

Total a

All

460

  1. DDD, Deciphering Developmental Disorders study; GATK, Genome Analysis Toolkit; indel, insertion/deletion; SNV, single-nucleotide variant.
  2. Reported variants that were considered by our clinical teams to explain all or part of a patient’s phenotype are summarized here; the variants themselves are available with associated phenotypes through DECIPHER (https://decipher.sanger.ac.uk). All variants are in published developmental disorder genes with sufficient evidence to merit inclusion on our clinician-curated gene-to-phenotype database (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/gene2phenotype/). Note that although most variants have been analytically validated in an accredited diagnostic laboratory, functional studies have not been systematically performed to confirm clinical pathogenicity. Discovery indicates that a new developmental gene was found and published by the DDD study.12,13,31
  3. aIncludes six dual diagnoses.