Table 2 Summary of results for outcomes in MPSII patients treated with ERT

From: Treatment of mucopolysaccharidosis type II (Hunter syndrome): results from a systematic evidence review

Outcome

Participants (studies)

Effect

P value

SOE

Comments

Urinary GAG level (μg/mg creatinine) reduction

Critical outcome for effectiveness

103

(6)

Percent reduction from baseline at 1 yr (0.5 mg/kg W):

weighted average 60%

(range 43 to 80%)

 

Moderate

Consistent in attenuated phenotype regardless of dose or age

 

32 W

32 EOW

32 Placebo

(1)

Percent reduction from baseline at 1 yr (0.5 mg/kg):

W and EOW effects >placebo;

W larger effect than EOW

<0.0001

0.039

Single study

 
 

32 W

32 EOW

32 Placebo

(2)

Mean difference W and EOW from placebo at 1 yr:

W: −207.4 (95% CI −284.8, −129.9);

EOW: −173.2 (95% CI −240.8, −105.6)

 

Single study

 

Liver volume

Important outcome for effectiveness

130

(3)

Percent reduction from baseline at 1 yr

(0.5 mg/kg W):

weighted average −25% (range −24% to −33%)

<0.002 all studies

Moderate

Remained constant for next 2 years

No observed dosage association

 

32 Tx/

32 placebo

(1)

Mean difference 1 yr: W: −24.5 (−28.9, −20.1);

EOW: −23.2 (−27.8, −18.6)

 

Single study

No observed dosage association

Harm: development of antibodies

Critical outcome for safety

IgG 1 yr, 74 (4);

2–4 yrs, 150 (4)

Neutralizing antibodies

1–2 yrs, 98 (4)

Increase in IgG at 1 and 2–4 yr (0.5 mg/kg W) by meta-analysis:

1 yr: 58% (95% CI 46–69);

2–4 yr: 33% (95% CI 20–49)

Subset developing

Neutralizing antibody at 0.5 mg/kg at 1–2 years

(range 41–100%)

0.019

Moderate

More evidence is needed on specific clinical effects of different antibodies and the potential covariates (e.g., genotype)

Harm: rates of IRRs and SAEs

Critical outcomes for safety

IRR 213 (6);

SAE 182 (5)

Rates of IRRs at 1 y (0.5 mg/kg):

63% (range 32–75%);

Rates of SAEs at 1y (0.5 mg/kg):

13% (range 2–25%)

 

Low

 

6-MWT (meters)

Less important outcome for effectiveness

32 W

32 EOW

32 Placebo

(1)

Grp 1 (W) increased from 392 to 436 m (44 m) compared to placebo

Grp 2 (EOW) increased 401 to 431 m (30 m) compared to placebo

0.013

0.073

Single Study

Other smaller studies (3) found longer distances, but were not statistically significant. 3-year follow-up of the RCT had 40% dropout

Growth: height

Important patient-centered outcome

216

(5)

Impact of ERT on the slope of age-adjusted z-score of height expressed as a change in z-score/month (0.023, 0.038, 0.040, and −0.007)

<0.001

0.004

<0.001

NS

Low

Fifth study provided only slope after ERT with no comparator

Pulmonary function (FVC%, normalized for age and sex)

Critical outcome for effectiveness

32 W

32 EOW

32 Placebo

(4)

FVC% change 1 yr:

Grp 1 (W): 55.3% increased by 2.8%

Grp 2 (EOW): 55.1% increased by <0.1%

FVC% change 3 yr:

Study 2: 39.3% increased by 3.8%

0.065

0.95

NS

Low

Of 3 other studies, one reported on only 4 of 11 patients, another did not test Elaprase-naive patients, and the last was a long-term follow-up of an RCT reporting only FVC

JROM

Important outcome for effectiveness/QoL

(3)

Nine measurements reported:

Shoulder flexion: 94° to 110°

Shoulder extension: 44° to 44°

Shoulder abduction: 75° to 95°

Knee flexion: 104° to 117°

Knee extension: −11° to −10°

Hip flexion: 89° to 103°

Hip extension: 3.1° to 1.9°

Elbow flexion: 121° to 122°

Elbow extension: −43° to −35°

0.07

0.94

0.13

0.47

0.88

0.03

0.75

0.83

0.63

Insufficient

Example from Okuyama 2010.

Most other studies reported only statistically significant results or specific measures that were statistically significant. Two studies apparently used different units/methods of measurements that were not compatible. Issues of multiple comparisons. Challenge to measure.

Benefit and harm: physical disability/quality of life

Critical patient-centered outcomes

81

27

22

(4)

Improved (parents) 1.50 to 1.37

+2.9% social, −0.6% fine motor, and −2.3% language, −7% gross motor

77% progressed, 14% stable, 9% improved

0.047

NS

Insufficient

3 patients unable to complete

Each study used completely different survey instrument(s), one of which was not previously validated.

Cardiac function

Critical outcome for effectiveness

6

10

(3)

LVMI (g/m2): 140 to 133

LVEF%: 57 to 64%

0.56

0.24

Insufficient

One other study was not in Elaprase-naive patients and another reported no significant changes

Sleep apnea

Important outcome for effectiveness

7 of 12

10

(2)

O2 desaturation events/hour: 19.2 to 2.4

O2 desaturation events/hour: 18 to 22

NS

NS

Insufficient

Although the average events/hour was reduced in one study, the change in the proportion with sleep apnea was not reported

Long-term outcomes

Critical outcomes for effectiveness

 

No studies addressed long-term measurable ERT outcomes

 

None

Examples include causes and durations of hospitalizations, common quantifiable measures of progression (e.g., frequency/severity of respiratory infections, progressive need for additional treatment or support); repeated testing for patient-centered outcomes (e.g., function, pain, quality of life); and survival

  1. 6-MWT, 6-minute walk test; EOW, every other week; ERT, enzyme replacement therapy; FVC, forced vital capacity, GAG, glycosaminoglycans; IRR, infusion-related reaction; JROM, joint range of motion; LVEF, left ventricle ejection fraction; LVMI, left ventricle mass index; NS, not significant; QoL, quality of life; RCT, randomized controlled trial; SAE, severe adverse event; SOE, strength of evidence; W, weekly.