Table 1 The spectrum of neurodevelopmental disabilities in adolescents and adults with HPE

From: In-depth investigations of adolescents and adults with holoprosencephaly identify unique characteristics

Subjects

HPE type

Developmental disability category

VINELAND Adaptive Behavior Scales

Full Scale IQ or estimate range

ASHA swallow outcome scale

ASHA diet restrictions scale

Subject 1

MIH

Intermediate

–

Moderate ID

–

4

Subject 2

Semilobar

Severe

20–21

–

6

4

Subject 3a

Semilobar

Severe

20–21

–

6

4

Subject 4

Semilobar

Severe

24

Profound ID

1

1

Subject 5

Semilobar

Severe

24

Profound ID

6

2

Subject 6

Lobar

Severe

–

–

–

2

Subject 7

MIH

Mild

53

Moderate ID

6

6

Subject 8

Semilobar

Severe

23

Profound ID

–

2

Subject 9

MIHb

Intermediate

36

–

–

4

Subject 10

MIH

Mild

55

Mild ID

6

6

Subject 11

Septopreopticc

Mild

72

Average

6

6

Subject 12

Lobar

Intermediate

–

–

–

3

Subject 13

semilobar

Severe

–

–

–

1

Subject 14

Lobar

Intermediate

28

Profound ID

–

4

Subject 15

Alobard

Severe

–

–

–

2

Subject 16

Semilobar

Severe

–

–

–

3

Subject 17

Semilobar

Severe

–

–

–

2

Subject 18

MIH

Mild

–

–

–

6

Subject 19

Semilobar

Severe

–

–

–

2

Subject 20

Semilobar

Severe

–

–

–

2

  1. ASHA, American Speech Language Hearing Association; HPE, holoprosencephaly; ID, intellectual disability; IQ, intelligence quotient; MIH, middle interhemispheric.
  2. The WASI-II was administered to subject 10; the Mullen was administered to subjects 4, 5, 8, and 14; the WAIS-IV was administered to subjects 7 and 10. The WISC-IV was administered to subject 1, who was not able to complete the test. His score is based on the general ability index. Full Scale IQ or estimate ranges: average=average range (85–115); borderline=71–84; mild ID=55–70; moderate ID=40–55; severe ID=26–39; profound ID=<25.
  3. ASHA diet restriction scale: 1=individual unable to swallow anything safely by mouth; 2=individual not able to swallow safely by mouth for nutrition and hydration; 3=individual taking less than 50% of nutrition and hydration by mouth; 4=swallowing is safe but moderate cues are required to use compensatory strategies, or the individual has moderate diet restrictions, or requires some gastrostomy-tube feeding; 5=swallowing is safe with minimal diet restriction and cueing, all nutritional needs are met per mouth; 6=swallowing is safe and the individual eats and drinks independently and requires cueing rarely. They may need to avoid specific foods or require additional time; 7=Swallowing is safe and efficient.
  4. aSibling of subject 2;
  5. bwith dysplastic cortex;
  6. cpatient was previously described by Hahn et al.;17
  7. dbased on a computed tomography scan.