Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Heredity
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • Log in
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. heredity
  3. original article
  4. article
The organisation of the incompatibility factors in higher fungi: The effect of structure and symmetry on breeding
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Original Article
  • Published: 01 February 1973

The organisation of the incompatibility factors in higher fungi: The effect of structure and symmetry on breeding

  • Judith Stamberg1 &
  • Y Koltin1 

Heredity volume 30, pages 15–26 (1973)Cite this article

  • 795 Accesses

  • 25 Citations

  • Metrics details

Summary

An evaluation of the structure of incompatibility systems in the higher fungi and its effect on inbreeding and outbreeding indicates that: In unifactorial systems a one-locus structure, which permits 50 per cent, inbreeding, is preferable to a two-locus structure, which would permit inbreeding to rise above 50 per cent. In bifactorial systems a two-locus structure for each factor is advantageous because it makes possible a high outbreeding potential with a small number of alleles. The two-locus structure also confers flexibility on the inbreeding potential. A symmetrical distribution of alleles among the four loci of a two-locus bifactorial system allows for maximal outbreeding. The advantage of symmetry is most pronounced when the total number of allelic specificities is not large. The asymmetrical distribution of alleles among the four incompatibility loci of Schizophyllum commune suggests that its incompatibility system evolved from a one-locus unifactorial system. The Aß locus, with 32 alleles, is assumed to be the oldest locus; the remaining three loci, with 9 alleles each, are assumed to have come into operation within a short time of each other, at a later stage.

Similar content being viewed by others

Developmental validation of a novel all-in one assay of X chromosomal multi-insertion/deletion loci for forensic genetics

Article Open access 28 December 2024

Breakdown of self-incompatibility due to genetic interaction between a specific S-allele and an unlinked modifier

Article Open access 09 June 2023

Long-term exhaustion of the inbreeding load in Drosophila melanogaster

Article Open access 16 August 2021

Article PDF

References

  • Burnett, J H. 1965. The natural history of recombination systems. In Incompatibility in Fungi (K. Esser and J. R. Raper, eds.), pp. 98–113. Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Day, P R. 1960. The structure of the A mating-type locus in Coprinus lagopus. Genetics, 45, 641–651.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Day, P R. 1963. The structure of the A mating-type factor in Coprinus lagopus: wild alleles. Genet Res, Camb, 4, 323–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky, T, and Wright, S. 1941. Genetics of natural populations. V. Relations between mutation rates and accumulation of lethals in populations of Drosophila pseudo-obscura. Genetics, 26, 23–52.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Flexer, A S. 1963. Bipolar incompatibility in Polyporus palustris. Thesis, Harvard Univ., Cambridge, Mass.

  • Flexer, A S. 1965. Bipolar incompatibility in Polyporus palustris. (Abstr.) Amer Jour Bot, 52, 634.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fries, N, and Jonasson, L. 1941. Über die Interfertilität verschiedener Stamme von Polyporus abietinus. Svensk Bot Tidskr, 35, 177–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koltin, Y, Raper, J R, and Simchen, G. 1967. The genetic structure of the incompatibility factors of Schizophyllum commune: The B factor. Proc Natl Acad Sci, US, 57, 55–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mather, K. 1942. Heterothally as an outbreeding mechanism in fungi. Nature, 149, 54–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neuhauser, K S, and Gilbertson, R L. 1971. Some aspects of bipolar heterothallism in Fomes cajanderi. Mycologia, 63, 722–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papazian, H P. 1951. The incompatibility factors and a related gene in Schizophyllum commune. Genetics, 36, 441–459.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Parag, Y, and Koltin, Y. 1971. The structure of the incompatibility factors of Schizophyllum commune: Constitution of the three classes of B factors. Molec Gen Genetics, 112, 43–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prévost, G. 1962. Étude génétique d'un Basidiomycète: Coprinus radiatus. Thesis, Univ. de Paris, Paris.

  • Raper, J R. 1966. Genetics of Sexuality in Higher Fungi. Ronald Press, New York. viii + 283 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raper, J R, Baxter, M G, and Ellingboe, A H. 1960. The genetic structure of the incompatibility factors of Schizophyllum commune: The A-factor. Proc Natl Acad Sci, US, 46, 833–842.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Raper, J R, Baxter, M G, and Middleton, R B. 1958. The genetic structure of the incompatibility factors in Schizophyllum commune. Proc Natl Acad Sci, US, 44, 889–900.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Raper, J R, Krongelb, G S, and Baxter, M G. 1958. The number and distribution of incompatibility factors in Schizophyllum commune. Amer Nat, 92, 221–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaap, T, and Simchen, G. 1971. Genetic control of recombination affecting mating factors in a population of Schizophyllum, and its relation to inbreeding. Genetics, 68, 67–75.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Simchen, G. 1967. Genetic control of recombination and the incompatibility system in Schizophyllum commune. Genet Res, Camb, 9, 195–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stamberg, J. 1968. Two independent gene systems controlling recombination in Schizophyllum commune. Molec Gen Genetics, 102, 221–228.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stamberg, J. 1969. Genetic control of recombination in Schizophyllum commune: The occurrence and significance of natural variation. Heredity, 24, 361–368.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stamberg, J, and Simchen, G. 1970. Specific effects of temperature on recombination in Schizophyllum commune. Heredity, 25, 41–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takemaru, T. 1961. Genetic studies on fungi. X. The mating system in Hymenomycetes and its genetical mechanism. Biol Jour Okayama Univ, 7, 133–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terakawa, H. 1960. The incompatibility factors in Pleurotus ostreatus. Scientific papers of the College of Gen Education, Univ. Tokyo, 10, 65–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehouse, H L K. 1949. Heterothallism and sex in fungi. Biol Rev, 24, 411–447.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Genetics Unit, Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel

    Judith Stamberg & Y Koltin

Authors
  1. Judith Stamberg
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Y Koltin
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stamberg, J., Koltin, Y. The organisation of the incompatibility factors in higher fungi: The effect of structure and symmetry on breeding. Heredity 30, 15–26 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1973.2

Download citation

  • Received: 16 February 1972

  • Issue date: 01 February 1973

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1973.2

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

This article is cited by

  • Evolution of uni- and bifactorial sexual compatibility systems in fungi

    • B P S Nieuwenhuis
    • S Billiard
    • T Giraud

    Heredity (2013)

  • The breeding biology of biotypes of the witches' broom pathogen of cocoa, Crinipellis perniciosa

    • G W Griffith
    • J N Hedger

    Heredity (1994)

  • Only one of the paired Schizophyllum commune Aα mating-type, putative homeobox genes encodes a homeodomain essential for Aα-regulated development

    • Yehung Luo
    • Robert C. Ullrich
    • Charles P. Novotny

    Molecular and General Genetics MGG (1994)

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Podcasts
  • Current issue
  • Collections
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Journal Information
  • Open access publishing
  • About the Editors
  • Contact
  • About the Partner
  • For Advertisers
  • Subscribe

Publish with us

  • For Authors & Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Heredity (Heredity)

ISSN 1365-2540 (online)

ISSN 0018-067X (print)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited