Summary
Darwin's model of sexual selection by variations in fitness at breeding time is generalised to allow for the sexual advantage of the favoured males to be only partial and not complete. If the earlier breeding pairs are the fitter, as Darwin assumed, then the favoured males will always gain a selective advantage; computer simulations show that this selection is frequency-dependent. If a female mating preference determines the sexual advantage of the males, then the proportion α of the females who exercise the mating preference will determine whether the frequency dependence is positive or negative. When α is less than 0·3, the overall selective advantage of the favoured males declines as they increase in frequency: the selection is thus negatively frequency-dependent. Polymorphic equilibria may also become established if natural selection is acting against the sexually favoured character of the males. When α is greater than 0·7, the selective advantage increases rapidly as the favoured males increase in frequency. When earlier pairs are not fitter and fitness at breeding time is distributed symmetrically round the optimum, males favoured as a result of a female mating preference can still gain an advantage even though a proportion of these males will be chosen by the earlier females and form pairs with low fitnesses. This model of sexual selection does not therefore depend on Darwin's assumption that the earlier pairs are the fitter.
Similar content being viewed by others
Article PDF
References
Coppinger, R P. 1970. The effect of experience and novelty on avian feeding behavior with reference to the evolution of warning coloration in butterflies. II. Reaction of naive birds to novel insects. Amer Natur, 104, 323–335.
Darwin, C. 1859. The Origin of Species, by Means of Natural Selection. Murray, London.
Darwin, O. 1871. The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex. Murray, London.
Ehrman, L. 1967. Further studies on genotypic frequency and mating success in Drosophila. Amer Natur, 101, 415–424.
Ehrman, L. 1968. Frequency dependence of mating success in Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genet Res, Camb, 11, 135–140.
Faugères, A, Petit, C, and Thibout, E. 1971. The components of sexual selection. Evolution, 25, 265–275.
Fisher, R A. 1930. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Clarendon, Oxford.
O'Donald, P. 1962. The theory of sexual selection. Heredity, 17, 541–552.
O'Donald, P. 1967. A general model of sexual and natural selection. Heredity, 22, 499–518.
O'Donald, P. 1972a. Natural selection of reproductive rates and breeding times and its effect on sexual selection. Amer Natur, 106, 368–379.
O'Donald, P. 1972b. Sexual selection by variations in fitness at breeding time. Nature, 237, 349–351.
Smith, J M. 1956. Fertility, mating behaviour and sexual selection in Drosophila subobscura. J Genet, 54, 261–279.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
O'Donald, P. Frequency-dependent sexual selection as a result of variations in fitness at breeding time. Heredity 30, 351–368 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1973.44
Received:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1973.44
This article is cited by
-
Genetic models of sexual and natural selection in monogamous organisms
Heredity (1980)
-
Geographic variation in body size and its relation to the mating structure of Tetraopes populations
Heredity (1979)
-
Some population genetic models combining sexual selection with assortative mating
Heredity (1978)
-
Mating preferences and sexual selection in the Arctic Skua
Heredity (1977)
-
Estimation of assortative mating preferences in the Arctic Skua
Heredity (1976)


