Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Heredity
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • Log in
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. heredity
  3. original article
  4. article
Frequency-dependent sexual selection as a result of variations in fitness at breeding time
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Original Article
  • Published: 01 June 1973

Frequency-dependent sexual selection as a result of variations in fitness at breeding time

  • Peter O'Donald1 

Heredity volume 30, pages 351–368 (1973)Cite this article

  • 1083 Accesses

  • 21 Citations

  • Metrics details

Summary

Darwin's model of sexual selection by variations in fitness at breeding time is generalised to allow for the sexual advantage of the favoured males to be only partial and not complete. If the earlier breeding pairs are the fitter, as Darwin assumed, then the favoured males will always gain a selective advantage; computer simulations show that this selection is frequency-dependent. If a female mating preference determines the sexual advantage of the males, then the proportion α of the females who exercise the mating preference will determine whether the frequency dependence is positive or negative. When α is less than 0·3, the overall selective advantage of the favoured males declines as they increase in frequency: the selection is thus negatively frequency-dependent. Polymorphic equilibria may also become established if natural selection is acting against the sexually favoured character of the males. When α is greater than 0·7, the selective advantage increases rapidly as the favoured males increase in frequency. When earlier pairs are not fitter and fitness at breeding time is distributed symmetrically round the optimum, males favoured as a result of a female mating preference can still gain an advantage even though a proportion of these males will be chosen by the earlier females and form pairs with low fitnesses. This model of sexual selection does not therefore depend on Darwin's assumption that the earlier pairs are the fitter.

Similar content being viewed by others

Genomic evidence that a sexually selected trait captures genome-wide variation and facilitates the purging of genetic load

Article 18 July 2022

Disentangling the causes of temporal variation in the opportunity for sexual selection

Article Open access 22 February 2023

Transient polymorphisms in parental care strategies drive divergence of sex roles

Article Open access 26 October 2023

Article PDF

References

  • Coppinger, R P. 1970. The effect of experience and novelty on avian feeding behavior with reference to the evolution of warning coloration in butterflies. II. Reaction of naive birds to novel insects. Amer Natur, 104, 323–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C. 1859. The Origin of Species, by Means of Natural Selection. Murray, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, O. 1871. The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex. Murray, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrman, L. 1967. Further studies on genotypic frequency and mating success in Drosophila. Amer Natur, 101, 415–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrman, L. 1968. Frequency dependence of mating success in Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genet Res, Camb, 11, 135–140.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Faugères, A, Petit, C, and Thibout, E. 1971. The components of sexual selection. Evolution, 25, 265–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R A. 1930. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Clarendon, Oxford.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • O'Donald, P. 1962. The theory of sexual selection. Heredity, 17, 541–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O'Donald, P. 1967. A general model of sexual and natural selection. Heredity, 22, 499–518.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • O'Donald, P. 1972a. Natural selection of reproductive rates and breeding times and its effect on sexual selection. Amer Natur, 106, 368–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O'Donald, P. 1972b. Sexual selection by variations in fitness at breeding time. Nature, 237, 349–351.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J M. 1956. Fertility, mating behaviour and sexual selection in Drosophila subobscura. J Genet, 54, 261–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Genetics, University of Cambridge,

    Peter O'Donald

Authors
  1. Peter O'Donald
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

O'Donald, P. Frequency-dependent sexual selection as a result of variations in fitness at breeding time. Heredity 30, 351–368 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1973.44

Download citation

  • Received: 06 June 1972

  • Issue date: 01 June 1973

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1973.44

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

This article is cited by

  • Genetic models of sexual and natural selection in monogamous organisms

    • P O'Donald

    Heredity (1980)

  • Geographic variation in body size and its relation to the mating structure of Tetraopes populations

    • David E McCauley

    Heredity (1979)

  • Some population genetic models combining sexual selection with assortative mating

    • Samuel Karlin
    • Peter O'Donald

    Heredity (1978)

  • Mating preferences and sexual selection in the Arctic Skua

    • P O'Donald

    Heredity (1977)

  • Estimation of assortative mating preferences in the Arctic Skua

    • J W F Davis
    • P O'Donald

    Heredity (1976)

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Podcasts
  • Current issue
  • Collections
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Journal Information
  • Open access publishing
  • About the Editors
  • Contact
  • About the Partner
  • For Advertisers
  • Subscribe

Publish with us

  • For Authors & Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Heredity (Heredity)

ISSN 1365-2540 (online)

ISSN 0018-067X (print)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited