Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Heredity
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • Log in
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. heredity
  3. original article
  4. article
Genetic differences between the Chinese and European races of the common carp
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Original Article
  • Published: 01 June 1975

Genetic differences between the Chinese and European races of the common carp

I. Analysis of genotype-environment interactions for growth rate

  • Rom Moav1,
  • G Hulata1 &
  • G Wohlfarth2 

Heredity volume 34, pages 323–340 (1975)Cite this article

  • 1387 Accesses

  • 79 Citations

  • Metrics details

Summary

Growth rate of 12 groups of common carp was measured at five experimental environments. Three of the 12 tested groups were strains of the domesticated European race of the common carp, one group was a representative of the Big-Belly Chinese race, and the remaining eight groups were F1 crossbreds among the European strains and between the European and the Chinese races. The average growth rate over the five environments of the Chinese Big-Belly was considerably poorer than that of the European carp. All the inter-race crossbreds and the crossbreds among the European strains showed heterosis. When the genotype-environment interaction was presented as a linear function of the quality of the environment, the regression coefficient (the overall responsiveness parameter) assumed relatively low values in the Big-Belly and two to two-and-a-half fold higher values in the European carp. The overall responsiveness of crossbreds was, on the average, intermediate between the two parents. When, however, it was partitioned into a scale function of the average genotype and specific independent responsiveness, the two components showed a high degree of heterosis but in opposite directions. An explanation of this genetic system in terms of adaptive evolution to the diverse modes of carp domestication in Europe and China was given.

Similar content being viewed by others

Uncovering genomic diversity and signatures of selection in red Angus × Chinese red steppe crossbred cattle population

Article Open access 15 April 2025

Genome-wide signatures of synergistic epistasis during parallel adaptation in a Baltic Sea copepod

Article Open access 12 July 2022

Genome-wide identification of the TGF-β superfamily and their expression in the Chinese mitten crab Eriocheir sinensis

Article Open access 13 April 2025

Article PDF

References

  • Alikunhi, K H. 1966. Synopsis of biological data on common carp, Cyprinus carpio L. 1758, Asia and the Far East. FAQ Fisheries Synopsis 31.1.

  • Bardach, J E, Ryther, J H, and McLarney, W O. 1972. Aquaculture The Farming and Husbandry of Freshwater and Marine Organisms, 868 pp. J. Wiley, N.Y.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentram, G. 1946. Carp farming in Palestine. Emp J Exp Agr, 14, 187–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bucio-Alanis, L. 1966. Environmental and genotype-environmental components of variability. I. Inbred lines. Heredity, 21, 387–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bucio-Alanis, L, Perkins, Jean M, and Jinks, J L. 1969. Environmental and genotype-environmental components of variability. V. Segregating generations. Heredity, 24, 115–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickerson, G E. 1962. Implications of genetic-environmental interactions in animal breeding. Anim Prod, 4, 47–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finlay, K W, and Wilkinson, G N. 1963. The analysis of adaptation in a plant breeding programme. Aust J Agric Res, 14, 742–754.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, G H. 1973. Statistical methods for the analysis of genotype-environment interactions. Heredity, 31, 339–354.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, G H, and Perkins, Jean M. 1971. Environmental and genotype-environmental components of variability. VIII. Relations between genotypes grown in different environments and measures of the environments. Heredity, 27, 15–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fripp, Yvonne J. 1972. Genotype-environmental interactions in Schizophyllum commune. II. Assessing the environment. Heredity, 28, 223–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fripp, Yvonne J, and Caten, C E. 1971. Genotype-environmental interactions in Schizophyllum commune. I. Analysis and character. Heredity, 27, 393–407.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hardwick, R C, and Wood, J T. 1972. Regression methods for studying genotype-environment interactions. Heredity, 28, 209–222.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hickling, C. 1962. Fish Culture, 287 pp. Faber and Faber, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, J, and Samuel, C J A. 1971. Measurement and inheritance of environmental response amongst selected material of Lolium perenne. Heredity, 27, 265–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, W E. 1934. Preliminary notes on the fresh-water fish industry of South China, especially Kwangtung province. Lingnan University Science Bulletin No 5, 70 pp. Lingnan Univ., Canton, China.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirpichnikov, V. 1971. Genetics of the common carp and other edible fish. Seminar/Study Tour in the USSR on genetic selection and hybridization of cultivated fishes. Rep FAOIUNDP(TA) (2926), 186–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, R. 1973. The relation between hybrid vigour and genotype-environment interactions. Theor Appl Genet, 43, 311–318.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moav, R, and Wohlfarth, G. 1970. Genetic correlation between seine escapability and growth capacity in carp. J Hered, 61, 153–157.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moav, R, and Wohlfarth, G. 1973. Fish breeding in Israel. In: Agricultural Genetics—Selected Topics (ed. R. Moav), 352 pp. J. Wiley, N.Y.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moav, R, and Wohlfarth, G. 1974. Magnification through competition of genetic differences in yield capacity in carp. Heredity, 33, 181–202.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moav, R, Wohlfarth, G, and Lahman, M. 1960a. Genetic improvement of carp. II. Marking fish by branding. Bamidgeh, 12, 49–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moav, R, Wohlfarth, G, and Lahman, M. 1960b. An electric instrument for brandmarking fish. Bamidgeh, 12, 92–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moav, R, Wohlfarth, G, and Lahman, M. 1964. Genetic improvement of carp. VI. Growth rate of carp imported from Holland relative to Israeli carp and some crossbred progeny. Bamidgeh, 16, 142–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paroda, R S, and Hayes, J D. 1971. An investigation of genotype-environment interactions for rate of ear emergence in spring barley. Heredity, 26, 157–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, Jean M, and Jinks, J L. 1968. Environmental and genotype-environmental components of variability. III. Multiple lines and crosses. Heredity, 23, 239–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, J M, and Jinks, J L. 1973. The assessment and specificity of environmental and genotype-environmental components of variability. Heredity, 30, 111–126.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tal, S, and Sheluvski, M. 1952. A review of the fish farming industry in Israel. Trans Am Fish Soc, 81, 218–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tukey, J W. 1949. One degree of freedom of non-additivity. Biometrics, 5, 232–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wohlfarth, G, and Moav, R. 1970. The effects of variation in spawning time on subsequent relative growth rate and viability in carp. Bamidgeh, 22, 42–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wohlfarth, G, and Moav, R. 1972. The regression of weight gain on initial weight in carp. I. Methods and results. Aquaculture, 1, 7–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wohlfarth, G, Lahman, M, Moav, R, and Ankorion, Y. 1965. Activities of the Carp Breeders Union in 1964. Bamidgeh, 17, 9–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yashouv, A. 1955. The Punten carp and its attributes. Bamidgeh, 7, 46–55.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Genetics, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel

    Rom Moav & G Hulata

  2. Fish and Aquaculture Research Station, Dor, Israel

    G Wohlfarth

Authors
  1. Rom Moav
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. G Hulata
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. G Wohlfarth
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Moav, R., Hulata, G. & Wohlfarth, G. Genetic differences between the Chinese and European races of the common carp. Heredity 34, 323–340 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1975.42

Download citation

  • Received: 20 June 1974

  • Issue date: 01 June 1975

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1975.42

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

This article is cited by

  • Genetic parameter estimates and genotype by environment interaction analyses for early growth traits in grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella)

    • Jianjun Fu
    • Yubang Shen
    • Jiale Li

    Aquaculture International (2015)

  • Performance of different tench, Tinca tinca (L.), groups under semi-intensive pond conditions: it is worth establishing a coordinated breeding program

    • Martin Kocour
    • David Gela
    • Martin FlajÅ¡hans

    Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries (2010)

  • Genetic diversity and population structure inferred from the partially duplicated genome of domesticated carp, Cyprinus carpio L.

    • Lior David
    • Noah A. Rosenberg
    • Jossi Hillel

    Genetics Selection Evolution (2007)

  • Genetic differences between the Chinese and European races of the common carp

    • G. W. Wohlfarth
    • R. Moav

    Theoretical and Applied Genetics (1990)

  • Genetic differences between the Chinese and European races of common carp

    • G. W. Wohlfarth
    • R. Moav
    • G. Hulata

    Theoretical and Applied Genetics (1986)

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Podcasts
  • Current issue
  • Collections
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Journal Information
  • Open access publishing
  • About the Editors
  • Contact
  • About the Partner
  • For Advertisers
  • Subscribe

Publish with us

  • For Authors & Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Heredity (Heredity)

ISSN 1365-2540 (online)

ISSN 0018-067X (print)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited