Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Heredity
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • Log in
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. heredity
  3. original article
  4. article
A model for the evolution of translocation heterozygosity
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Original Article
  • Published: 01 December 1979

A model for the evolution of translocation heterozygosity

  • Marina de Waal Malefijt1 nAff2 &
  • Brian Charlesworth1 

Heredity volume 43, pages 315–331 (1979)Cite this article

  • 2541 Accesses

  • 21 Citations

  • 3 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

Summary

This paper uses algebraic analysis and computer simulation to examine the contribution of homozygote disadvantage created by mutational load to selection for translocation heterozygosity in selfing populations. It is shown first that in structurally homozygous populations mutation pressure can lead to the accumulation of deleterious mutations, as opposed to the establishment of a stable equilibrium between mutational input and selective elimination. The speed of accumulation depends on the mutation rate and inversely on the selection coefficients against deleterious alleles, the population size and the amount of recombination. It is also shown that translocations can be selected, given a sufficiently high rate of mutation per chromosome and provided that crossing-over is suppressed in structural heterozygotes. Incomplete dominance of deleterious mutations lowers the strength of selection for translocations, compared with the case of complete recessivity. In all cases when translocations are selected there is accumulation of deleterious genes in structural heterozygotes, so that the final population consists entirely of structural heterozygotes, the homozygotes behaving effectively as recessive lethals.

The model is discussed in relation to what is known about translocation heterozygosity in natural populations, and about mutation rates and selection coefficients for deleterious genes. It is concluded that an unrealistically high mutation rate is probably needed for this mechanism to be the sole factor involved in initiating the evolution of complex heterozygosity in largely self-fertilising plants. It may, however, be an important contributary factor, and we show that it is likely to be more important, the larger the number of interchanges already established in the population.

Similar content being viewed by others

Hybrid adaptation is hampered by Haldane’s sieve

Article Open access 28 November 2024

Fitness consequences of hybridization in a predominantly selfing species: insights into the role of dominance and epistatic incompatibilities

Article 07 August 2021

Long-term exhaustion of the inbreeding load in Drosophila melanogaster

Article Open access 16 August 2021

Article PDF

References

  • Bhaduri, A. 1942. Further cytological investigations in the genus Gaura. Ann Bot, 6, 229–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charlesworth, B. 1979. Selection for gamete lethals and S-alleles in complex heterozygotes. Heredity, 43, 154–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charlesworth, B, and Charlesworth, B. 1973. Selection of new inversions in multi-locus genetic systems. Genet Res, 21, 167–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charlesworth, D, and Charlesworth, B. 1979. Selection on recombination in partially self-fertilising populations. Submitted to Genetics.

  • Charlesworth, D, Charlesworth, B, and Strobeck, C. 1977. Effects of selfing on selection for recombination. Genetics, 86, 213–226.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Cleland, R E. 1972. Oenothera Cytogenetics and Evolution. Academic Press, London and New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darlington, C D. 1958. Evolution of Genetic Systems. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky, T. 1931. The decrease of crossing over observed in translocations and its probable explanation. Amer Nat, 65, 214–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, M W. 1972. Selection for linkage modification. 1. Random mating populations. Theor Pop Biol, 3, 324–346.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, M W, and Balkau, B. 1972. Some results in the theory of three gene loci. In Population Dynamics, ed. T. R. E. Greville. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felsenstein, J. 1974. The evolutionary advantage of recombination. Genetics, 78, 737–756.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Haigh, J. 1978. The accumulation of deleterious genes in a finite population—Muller's ratchet. Theor Pop Biol, 14, 251–267.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Haldane, J B S. 1937. The effect of variation on fitness. Amer Nat, 71, 337–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haldane, J B S. 1950. The association of characters as a result of inbreeding and linkage. Ann Eugen, 15, 15–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heller, R, and Maynard Smith, J. 1979. Muller's ratchet with selling. Genet Res, 32, 289–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoar, C S. 1931. Meiosis in Hypericum punctatum. Bat Gaz, 92, 396–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holden, L R. 1979. New properties of the two-locus partial selfing model with selection. Genetics, in press.

  • James, S H. 1965. Complex hybridity in Isotoma petraea. I. The occurrence of interchange heterozygosity, autogamy and a balanced lethal system. Heredity, 20, 341–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, S H. 1970. Complex hybridity in Isotoma petraea. II. Components and operation of a possible evolutionary mechanism. Heredity, 25, 53–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • John, B, and Lewis, K R. 1958. Studies on Periplaneta americana. III. Selection for heterozygosity. Heredity, 12, 185–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • John, B, and Lewis, K R. 1959. Selection for interchange heterozygosity in an inbred culture of Blaberus dixoidalis (Serville). Genetics, 44, 251–267.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, H, and Szweykowski, J. 1964. The genus Gayophytum. Brittonia, 16, 343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, K R, and John, B. 1957. Studies on Periplaneta americana. II. Interchange heterozygosity in isolated populations. Heredity, 11, 11–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, K R, and John, B. 1963. Chromosome Marker. Churchill, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith, J, and Haigh, J. 1974. The hitch-hiking effect of a favourable gene. Genet Res, 23, 23–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mooring, J. 1958. A cytogenetic study of Clarkia unguiculata. Amer J Bat, 47, 233–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muller, H J. 1964. The relation of recombination to mutational advance. Mut Res, 1, 2–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nei, M, Kojima, K, and Schaefer, H. 1967. Frequency changes of new inversions under mutation-selection equilibria. Genetics, 57, 741–750.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Rana, R S, and Jain, H K. 1965. Adaptive role of interchange heterozygosity in the annual Chrysanthemum. Heredity, 20, 21–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raven, P H, and Gregory, D P. 1972. Observations of meiotic chromosomes in Gaura (Onagraceae). Brittonia, 24, 71–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sax, K. 1931. Chromosome ring formation in Rhoeo discolor. Cytologia, 3, 36–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sax, K. 1935. Chromosome structure in meiotic chromosomes of Rhoeo discolor Hance. J Arnold Arb, 16, 216–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlising, R A. 1976. Reproductive proficiency in Paeonia calfornica. Amer J Bot, 63, 1095–1103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simmons, M J, and Crow, J F. 1977. Mutations affecting fitness in Drosophila populations. Ann Rev Genet, 11, 49–78.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stebbins, G L. 1971. Chromosomal Evolution in Higher Plants. Edward Arnold, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stebbins, G L, and Ellerton, S. 1939. Structural hybridity in Paeonia calfornica and P. brownii. J Genet, 38, 1–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, E. 1956. New aspects of the balanced lethal mechanism in Oenothera.brownii. Genetics, 41, 486–500.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Walters, J L. 1942. Distribution of structural hybrids in Paeonia calffornica. Amer J Bot, 29, 270–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wedberg, H L, Lewis, H, and Venkatesh, C S. 1968. Translocation heterozygotes in Clarkia. Evolution, 22, 93–107.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • White, M J D. 1973. Animal Cytology and Evolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, S. 1941. On the probability of fixation of reciprocal translocations. Amer Nat, 75, 513–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes
  1. Marina de Waal Malefijt

    Present address: Vakgroep populatie-en evolutiebiologie, Rijksuniversiteit Utrecht, Padualaan 8, Postbus 80.055, 3508 TB, Utrecht, Holland

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Biological Sciences, University of Sussex, Brighton, BN1 9QG, Sussex, England

    Marina de Waal Malefijt & Brian Charlesworth

Authors
  1. Marina de Waal Malefijt
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Brian Charlesworth
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

de Waal Malefijt, M., Charlesworth, B. A model for the evolution of translocation heterozygosity. Heredity 43, 315–331 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1979.85

Download citation

  • Received: 26 March 1979

  • Issue date: 01 December 1979

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1979.85

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

This article is cited by

  • Platypus and echidna genomes reveal mammalian biology and evolution

    • Yang Zhou
    • Linda Shearwin-Whyatt
    • Guojie Zhang

    Nature (2021)

  • Complex hybridity in Isotoma petraea. VII. Assembly of the genetic system in the O6 Pigeon Rock population

    • S H James
    • J F Sampson
    • J Playford

    Heredity (1990)

  • Selection for gamete lethals and S-alleles in complex heterozygotes

    • Brian Charlesworth

    Heredity (1979)

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Podcasts
  • Current issue
  • Collections
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Journal Information
  • Open access publishing
  • About the Editors
  • Contact
  • About the Partner
  • For Advertisers
  • Subscribe

Publish with us

  • For Authors & Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Heredity (Heredity)

ISSN 1365-2540 (online)

ISSN 0018-067X (print)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2025 Springer Nature Limited