Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Heredity
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • Log in
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. heredity
  3. original article
  4. article
Sexual selection by female choice in a monogamous bird: Darwin's theory corroborated
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Original Article
  • Published: October 1980

Sexual selection by female choice in a monogamous bird: Darwin's theory corroborated

  • P O'Donald1 

Heredity volume 45, pages 201–217 (1980)Cite this article

  • 2107 Accesses

  • 32 Citations

  • Metrics details

Summary

The Arctic Skua is a seabird that is polymorphic for dark, intermediate and pale phenotypes of plumage. The melanic, dark and intermediate males can find mates sooner in the breeding season than the non-melanic, pale males. When males are looking for new mates, melanic males find mates on average four days sooner than non-melanic males. There is no difference in the breeding dates of the females, nor in the breeding dates of males who have not changed their mates. The difference in the males' breeding dates is found only on change of mate. Finding a new mate takes about six days for a dark male, about eight days for an intermediate male, and about eleven days for a pale male. These differences give the melanic males an advantage by sexual selection: exactly as Darwin had postulated in his theory of sexual selection of monogamous birds, the earlier pairs are more successful in terms of the numbers of chicks they rear to fledging. The overall disadvantage of intermediates and pales relative to darks is given by the sexual selective coefficients

The melanic males gain their advantage because the females prefer to mate with them. Models of female preference entail distributions of breeding dates that fit the data better than models of male competition. The earlier breeding of melanic males can be satisfactorily explained if 38 per cent of females prefer to mate with melanics rather than with non-melanics. In the model which fits the data best, 4 per cent of females prefer dark males and 34 per cent prefer either dark or intermediate males. Further evidence, which strongly supports the theory of female choice, is provided by the stability of the polymorphism, the existence of assortative mating, and the absence of any effect of male experience on the chances of finding a mate. The data of the Arctic Skua corroborate Darwin's theory of sexual selection by female choice in monogamous birds.

Similar content being viewed by others

Fight or flight alternative mating tactics may explain the iconic male polymorphism of the European stag beetle

Article Open access 21 October 2024

Male attractiveness in fruit flies is influenced by previous exposure of females to males of different attractiveness

Article Open access 16 July 2024

Male and female contributions to diversity among birdwing butterfly images

Article Open access 01 July 2024

Article PDF

References

  • Charlesworth, D, and Charlesworth, B. 1975. Sexual selection and polymorphism. Amer Natur, 109, 465–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C R. 1871. The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex. John Murray, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J W F, and O'Donald, P. 1976a. Estimation of assortative mating preferences in the Arctic Skua. Heredity, 36, 235–244.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J W F, and O'Donald, P. 1976b. Territory size, breeding time and mating preference in the Arctic Skua. Nature, 260, 774–775.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, A W F. 1972. Likelihood. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrman, L, and Spiess, E B. 1969. Rare type mating advantage in Drosophila. Amer Natur, 103, 675–680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O'Donald, P. 1972. Natural selection of reproductive rates and breeding times and its effect on sexual selection. Amer Natur, 106, 368–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O'Donald, P. 1974. Polymorphisms maintained by sexual selection in monogamous species of birds. Heredity, 32, 1–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • O'Donald, P. 1976. Mating preferences and their genetic effects in models of sexual selection for colour phases of the Arctic Skua. Population Genetics and Ecology, ed. S. Karlin and E. Nevo, pp. 411–430. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Donald, P. 1977a. Theoretical aspects of sexual selection. Theor Pop Biol, 12, 298–334.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • O'Donald, P. 1977b. Mating preferences and sexual selection in the Arctic Skua. II. Behavioural mechanisms of the mating preferences. Heredity, 39, 111–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O'Donald, P. 1978a. Theoretical aspects of sexual selection: a generalized model of mating behaviour. Theor Pop Biol, 13, 226–243.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • O'Donald, P. 1978b. Rare male mating advantage. Nature, 272, 189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O'Donald, P. 1979. Theoretical aspects of sexual selection: variation in threshold of female mating response. Theor Pop Biol, 15, 191–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O'Donald, P. 1980a. Genetic Models of Sexual Selection. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Donald, P. 1980b. Genetic models of sexual and natural selection in monogamous organisms. Heredity, 44, 391–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O'Donald, P, and Davis, J W F. 1975. Demography and selection in a population of Arctic Skuas. Heredity, 35, 75–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O'Donald, P, and Davis, J W F. 1977. Mating preferences and sexual selection in the Arctic Skua. III. Estimation of parameters and tests of heterogeneity. Heredity, 39, 121–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O'Donald, P, Wedd, N S, and Davis, J W F. 1974. Mating preferences and sexual selection in the Arctic Skua. Heredity, 33, 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spiess, E B, and Ehrman, L. 1978. Rare male mating advantage. Nature, 272, 188–189.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Genetics, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge, CB2 3EH, England

    P O'Donald

Authors
  1. P O'Donald
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

O'Donald, P. Sexual selection by female choice in a monogamous bird: Darwin's theory corroborated. Heredity 45, 201–217 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1980.61

Download citation

  • Received: 19 February 1980

  • Issue date: October 1980

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1980.61

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

This article is cited by

  • Phenotypic assortative mating and genetic population structure in the crab Trapezia digitalis

    • M. E. Huber

    Marine Biology (1987)

  • Female choice contributes to offspring fitness in the field cricket, Gryllus bimaculatus (De Geer)

    • L. W. Simmons

    Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology (1987)

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Podcasts
  • Current issue
  • Collections
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Journal Information
  • Open access publishing
  • About the Editors
  • Contact
  • About the Partner
  • For Advertisers
  • Subscribe

Publish with us

  • For Authors & Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Heredity (Heredity)

ISSN 1365-2540 (online)

ISSN 0018-067X (print)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2025 Springer Nature Limited