Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Heredity
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • Log in
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. heredity
  3. original article
  4. article
Genome size variation among north american minnows (Cyprinidae). I. distribution of the variation in five species
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Original Article
  • Published: 01 June 1985

Genome size variation among north american minnows (Cyprinidae). I. distribution of the variation in five species

  • John R Gold1 &
  • H James Price1 

Heredity volume 54, pages 297–305 (1985)Cite this article

  • 706 Accesses

  • 32 Citations

  • Metrics details

Abstract

Genome sizes (nuclear DNA contents) were examined spectrophotometrically from ten individuals of each of five species of North American cyprinid fishes (minnows). The distributions of DNA values both within and between the five species were essentially continuous and normal. Differences between individuals within populations were significant and contributed to approximately 16 per cent of the total variation. Variation between individuals within species ranged from 4·7–13·5 per cent and averaged ca. 7·4 per cent. Variation between species ranged from 0–9·5 per cent and the average difference between any species pair was ca. 4·per cent. Statistical analyses showed that the methodology used was sufficient to detect significant differences in genome size as small as 2–3 per cent. Consideration of these data lead to the following tentative conclusions: (i) changes in genome size in cyprinids appear small in amount, frequent in occurrence, to involve both gains and losses of DNA, and to be cumulative and independent in effect; (ii) differences within and between cyprinid taxa are likely the result of accumulations of small changes in DNA quantity; and (iii) the primary focus of quantitative DNA variation in cyprinids is between individuals within populations. The extent of DNA quantity variation which occurs within species would appear to preclude any direct relationship between genome size variation and many of the organismal parameters (including speciation) which differentiate the five species. In short, the data suggest that a significant fraction of the cyprinid genome, perhaps more than 10 per cent, is free to vary quantitatively without phenotypic constraint or biological consequence. This fraction is considerably larger than that theoretically needed for the structural gene component.

Similar content being viewed by others

Chromosome-scale genome assembly and annotation of Xenocypris argentea

Article Open access 04 April 2025

Linking genome size variation to population phenotypic variation within the rotifer, Brachionus asplanchnoidis

Article Open access 19 May 2021

Genome sequencing and assembly of near threatened Clarias dussumieri (Valenciennes, 1840), an endemic catfish of peninsular India

Article Open access 19 December 2024

Article PDF

References

  • Bachmann, K, Goin, O B, and Goin, C J. 1972. Nuclear DNA amounts in vertebrates. Brookhaven Symp Biol, 23, 419–450.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, M D. 1971. The duration of meiosis. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B, 178, 277–299.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, M D. 1972. Nuclear DNA content and minimum mitotic time in herbaceous plants. Proc R Soe Lond SerB, 181, 109–135.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, M D. 1976. DNA amount, latitude, and crop plant distribution. Envir Exptl Bot, 16, 93–108.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, M D, and Smith, J B. 1976. Nuclear DNA amounts in angiosperms. Phil Trans R Soc London Ser B, 274, 227–274.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cavalier-Smith, T. 1978. Nuclear volume control by nucleoskeletal DNA, selection for cell volume and growth rate, and the solution of the DNA C-value paradox. J Cell Sci, 34, 247–278.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cavalier-Smith, T. 1980. r- and K-tactics in the evolution of protist developmental systems: cell and genome size, phenotype diversifying selection and cell cycle patterns. BioSystems, 12, 43–59.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cavalier Smith, T. 1982. Skeletal DNA and the evolution of genome size. Ann Rev Biophys Bioeng, 11, 273–302.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Doolittle, W F, and Sapienza, C. 1980. Selfish genes, the phenotypic paradigm and genome evolution. Nature, 284, 601–603.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ebeling, A W, Atkin, N B, and Setzer, P Y. 1971. Genome sizes of teleostean fishes: increases in some deep-sea species. Amer Nat, 105, 549–561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fand, S B. 1970. Environmental conditions for optimal Feulgen hydrolysis. In Wied, G. L. and Bahr, G. F. (eds.) Introduction to Quantitative Cytochemistry, II Academic Press, New York and London, pp. 209–221.

  • Flavell, R B, Bennett, M D, Smith, J B, and Smith, D B. 1974. Genome size and the proportion of repeated nucleotide sequence DNA in plants. Biochem Genet, 12, 257–269.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia, A M. 1970. Stoichiometry of dye binding versus degree of chromatin coiling. In Wied, G. L. and Bahr, G. F. (eds.) Introduction to Quantitative Cytochemistry, II Academic Press, New York and London, pp. 153–170.

  • Gibbs, R H, Jr.. 1957. Cyprinid fishes of the subgenus Cyprinella, with a key to the species exclusive of the lutrensisornatus complex. Copeia, 185–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gold, J R, Bennett, L F, and Gall, G A E. 1975. A set of tables for determining minimum sample sizes necessary to show statistically significant differences among treatment groups using analysis of variance. Div Agric Sci, Univ. California, Spec. Pub. #3051, pp. 1–9, with Tables I-XII.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gold, J R, Karel, W J, and Strand, M R. 1980. Chromosome formulae of North American Fishes. Progr Fish-Cult, 42, 10–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatch, F T, Bodner, A J, and Mazrimas, J A. 1976. Satellite DNA and cytogenetic evolution. Chromosoma, 58, 155–168.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hinegardner, R. 1974. Cellular DNA content of the Mollusca. Comp Biochem Physiol, 47A, 447–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinegardner, R. 1976. Evolution of genome size. In Ayala, F. J. (ed.) Molecular Evolution, Sinauer, Sunderland, MA, pp. 179–199.

  • Hinegardner, R, and Rosen, D. 1972. Cellular DNA content and the evolution of teleostean fishes. Amer Nat, 106, 621–644.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hubbs, C L. 1955. Hybridization between fish species in nature. Syst Zool, 4, 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hubbs, C L, and Black, J D. 1947. Revision of Ceratichthys, a genus of American cyprinid fishes. Misc Pub Mus Zool, Univ. Michigan, 66, 1–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humason, G L. 1979. Animal Tissue Techniques. Freeman and Sons, San Francisco, CA.

  • Hutchinson, J, Narayan, R K J, and Rees, H. 1980. Constraints on the composition of supplementary DNA. Chromosoma, 78, 137–145.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman, S. 1971. Gene regulation networks: a theory for their global structures and behaviors. In Moscona, A. A. and Monroy, A. (eds.) Current Topics in Developmental Biology, Academic Press, New York and London, pp. 145–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, A. 1981. A reevaluation of the relationship between genome size and genetic variation. Amer Nat, 118, 119–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, D S, Gilbert, C R, Hocutt, C H, Jenkins, R E, McCallister, D E, and Stauffer, J R. 1980. Atlas of North American Freshwater Fishes. Pub. #1980–12, North Carolina Biol. Surv., North Carolina St. Mus. Nat. Hist., Raleigh, N.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazin, A L. 1980. Amounts of nuclear DNA in anurans of the USSR. Experientia, 36, 190–191.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mettler, L E, and Gregg, T G. 1969. Population Genetics and Evolution. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R R. 1959. Origin and affinities of the freshwater fish fauna of western North America. Zoogeography, Amer.Assoc. Adv. Sci. Pub., 51, 187–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mizuno, S, and MacGregor, H C. 1974. Chromosomes, DNA sequences, and evolution in salamanders of the genus Plethodon. Chromosoma, 48, 239–296.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, M G, Peters, D L, and Thompson, W F. 1981. Ancient repeated sequences in the pea and mung bean genomes and implications for genome evolution. J Mol Evol, 17, 31–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Narayan, R K J. 1982. Discontinuous DNA variation in the evolution of plant species: the genus Lathyrus. Evolution, 36, 877–891.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ohno, S. 1972. So much “junk” DNA in our genome. Brookhaven Symp Biol, 23, 366–370.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Orgel, L E, and Crick, F H C. 1980. Selfish DNA: the ultimate parasite. Nature, 284, 604–607.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, E D, Jr., and Kreitman, M. 1982. On the relationship between heterozygosity and DNA content. Amer Nat, 119, 749–752.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, B A, and Mitton, J B. 1980. The relationship between genome size and genetic variation. Amer Nat, 116, 850–861.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price, H J. 1976. Evolution of DNA content in higher plants. Bot Rev, 42, 27–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Price, H J, Chambers, K L, and Bachmann, K. 1981a. Geographic and ecological distribution of genomic DNA content variation in Microseris douglasii (Asteraceae). Bot Gaz, 142, 415–426.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Price, H J, Chambers, K L, and Bachmann, K. 1981b. Genome size variation in Microseris bigelovii (Asteraceae). Bot Gaz, 142, 156–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasch, E M, Barr, H J, and Rasch, R W. 1971. The DNA content of sperm of Drosophila melanogaster. Chromosoma, 33, 1–18.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rees, H, and Jones, G H. 1972. The origin of the wide species variation in nuclear DNA content. Int Rev Cytol, 32, 53–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sherwood, S W, and Patton, J L, 1982. Genome evolution in pocket gophers (genus Thomomys). II. Variation in cellular DNA content. Chromosoma, 85, 163–179.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shuter, B J, Thomas, J E, Taylor, W D, and Zimmerman, M. 1983. Phenotypic correlates of genomic DNA contents in unicellular eukaryotes and other cells. Amer Nat, 122, 26–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stebbins, G L. 1966. Processes of Organic Evolution. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal, R R, and Rohlf, F J. 1969. Biometry. W. J. Freeman and Sons, San Francisco, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparrow, A H, Price, H J, and Underbrink, A G. 1972. A survey of DNA content per cell and per chromosome of prokaryotic and eukaryotic organisms: some evolutionary considerations. Brookhaven Symp Biol, 23, 451–494.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Szarski, H. 1974. Cell size and nuclear DNA content in vertebrates. Int Rev Cytol, 44, 93–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Wildlife and Fisheries Sciences and Department of Soil and Crop Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, 77843

    John R Gold & H James Price

Authors
  1. John R Gold
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. H James Price
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gold, J., Price, H. Genome size variation among north american minnows (Cyprinidae). I. distribution of the variation in five species. Heredity 54, 297–305 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1985.40

Download citation

  • Received: 13 August 1984

  • Issue date: 01 June 1985

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1985.40

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

This article is cited by

  • Genome-size variation in bivalve molluscs determined by flow cytometry

    • A. M. Rodr�guez-Ju�z
    • M. Torrado
    • J. M�ndez

    Marine Biology (1996)

  • Nuclear genome characterization of the carrageenophyteAgardhiella subulata (Rhodophyta)

    • Donald F. Kapraun
    • Julie A. Dutcher
    • Juan Lopez-Bautista

    Journal of Applied Phycology (1992)

  • Intraspecific variation in nuclear DNA content among world populations of a mosquito, Aedes albopictus (Skuse)

    • A. Kumar
    • K. S. Rai

    Theoretical and Applied Genetics (1990)

  • Chromosomes and constitutive heterochromatin distribution in Arctic charr, Salvelinus alpinus (L.) (Pisces: Salmonidae)

    • S. E. Hartley

    Genetica (1989)

  • A thermal denaturation study of genomic DNAs from North American minnows (Cyprinidae: Teleostei)

    • W. J. Karel
    • J. R. Gold

    Genetica (1987)

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Podcasts
  • Current issue
  • Collections
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Journal Information
  • Open access publishing
  • About the Editors
  • Contact
  • About the Partner
  • For Advertisers
  • Subscribe

Publish with us

  • For Authors & Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Heredity (Heredity)

ISSN 1365-2540 (online)

ISSN 0018-067X (print)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2025 Springer Nature Limited