Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Heredity
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • Log in
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. heredity
  3. original article
  4. article
On the choice of mathematical models for the estimation of lethal gene equivalents in man
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Original Article
  • Published: 01 December 1986

On the choice of mathematical models for the estimation of lethal gene equivalents in man

  • E Makov1 nAff3 &
  • A H Bittles2 

Heredity volume 57, pages 377–380 (1986)Cite this article

  • 601 Accesses

  • 7 Citations

  • Metrics details

Abstract

A range of mathematical models and error distributions was used to examine the validity of linear regression methods for the calculation of lethal gene equivalents. Because of the restricted span of inbreeding coefficient F values available in human studies and the limited number of data points, equivalent results were obtained with all combinations tested. It was concluded that linear regressions should be employed only for the detection of significant inbreeding effects in man and that their application to the estimation of lethal gene equivalents was not warranted.

Similar content being viewed by others

Improving gene isoform quantification with miniQuant

Article Open access 03 June 2025

Comparison of transformations for single-cell RNA-seq data

Article Open access 10 April 2023

Interventions to support patients with sharing genetic test results with at-risk relatives: a synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM)

Article Open access 21 June 2023

Article PDF

References

  • Azevedo, E S, Freire-Maia, N, Azevedo, M C C, Weiner, T A, and Souza, M M M. 1980. Inbreeding in a Brazilian general hospital. Ann Hum Genet 43, 255–264.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, R J, and Nelder, J A. 1978. GLIM Manual, (release 3), Numerical Algorithms Group, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bemiss, S M. 1958. Report on influence of marriages of consanguinity upon offspring. Trans Amer Med Assoc 11, 319–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bittles, A H, and Makov, E. 1985. Linear regressions in the calculation of lethal gene equivalents in man. Ann Hum Biol 12, 287–289.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cavallisforza, L L, and Bodmer, W F. 1971. The Genetics of Human Populations, W. H. Freeman, San Francisco, pp. 360–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakraborty, R, and Chakravarti, A. 1977. On consanguineous marriage and the genetic load. Hum Genet. 36, 47–54.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dobson, A J. 1983. Introduction to Statistical Modelling, Chapman and Hall, London.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Freire-Maia, N. 1984. Effects of consanguineous marriages on morbidity and precocious mortality: genetic counselling. Amer J Med Genet. 18, 401–406.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McCullagh, P, and Nelder, J A. 1983. Generalized Linear Models, Chapman and Hall, London.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Morton, N E, Crow, J F, and Muller, H J. 1956. An estimate of the mutational damage in man from data on consanguineous marriages. Proc Natl Acad Sci (USA) 42, 855–863.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Neel, J V, and Schull, W J. 1962. The effect of inbreeding on mortality and morbidity in two Japanese cities. Proc Natl Acad Sci (USA) 48, 573–582.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rao, P S S, and Inbaraj, S G. 1979. Trends in human reproductive wastage in relation to long-term practice of inbreeding. Ann Hum Genet 42, 401–413.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schull, W J. 1958. Empirical risks in consanguineous marriages: sex ratio, malformation and viability. Amer J Hum Genet 10, 294–343.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C A B. 1967. Note on a paper by S. Kumar, R. A. Pai and M. S. Swaminathan. Ann Hum Genet 31, 146–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C A B. 1969. Corrigenda. Ann Hum Genet 32, 419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spiess, E B. 1977. Genes in Populations, John Wiley, New York, pp. 604–608.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutter, J, and Tabah, L. 1952. Effets de la consanguinité et de l'endogamie. Une enquete en Morbihan et Loir et Cher. Population 7, 249–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutter, J, and Tabah, L. 1953. Structure de la mortalité dans les familles consanguines. Population 8, 511–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamaguchi, M, Yanase, T, Nagano, H, and Nakamoto, N. 1970. Effects of inbreeding on mortality in Fukuoka population. Amer J Hum Genet 22, 145–159.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes
  1. E Makov

    Present address: Department of Statistics, University of Haifa, Mount Carmel, Haifa, Israel, 31999

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer Science and Statistics, Queen Mary College, Mile End Road, London, E14 NS, UK

    E Makov

  2. Department of Anatomy and Human Biology, King's College, Strand, London, WC2R 2LS, UK

    A H Bittles

Authors
  1. E Makov
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A H Bittles
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Makov, E., Bittles, A. On the choice of mathematical models for the estimation of lethal gene equivalents in man. Heredity 57, 377–380 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1986.136

Download citation

  • Received: 19 February 1986

  • Issue date: 01 December 1986

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1986.136

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Podcasts
  • Current issue
  • Collections
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Journal Information
  • Open access publishing
  • About the Editors
  • Contact
  • About the Partner
  • For Advertisers
  • Subscribe

Publish with us

  • For Authors & Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Heredity (Heredity)

ISSN 1365-2540 (online)

ISSN 0018-067X (print)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited