Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Heredity
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • Log in
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. heredity
  3. original article
  4. article
Heredity of rover/sitter: Alternative foraging strategies of Drosophila melanogaster larvae
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Original Article
  • Published: 01 August 1987

Heredity of rover/sitter: Alternative foraging strategies of Drosophila melanogaster larvae

  • J Steven de Belle1 &
  • Marla B Sokolowski1 

Heredity volume 59, pages 73–83 (1987)Cite this article

  • 6605 Accesses

  • 113 Citations

  • Metrics details

Abstract

The heredity of rover/sitter, a naturally occurring polymorphism in the locomotory component of Drosophila melanogaster third instar larval foraging behaviour was analysed by comparing 16 reciprocal crosses made using isogenic rover and sitter parental strains. Results from both male and female data sets indicated that rover/sitter differences have an autosomal basis, with rover showing complete dominance over sitter. The Y-chromosome, permanent cytoplasmic factors, transient maternal factors and interactions between them made no significant contributions to rover/sitter inheritance. A minor X-chromosome effect was observed in the female data. Rover/sitter ratios in both males and females of the 16 reciprocal crosses were not significantly different from those expected assuming a one gene, complete dominance model of autosomal inheritance.

Similar content being viewed by others

Y chromosome-linked variation affects locomotor activity in male Drosophila melanogaster and is robust to differences in thermal environment

Article Open access 13 March 2023

Mating increases Drosophila melanogaster females’ choosiness by reducing olfactory sensitivity to a male pheromone

Article 21 June 2021

Large-scale characterization of sex pheromone communication systems in Drosophila

Article Open access 06 July 2021

Article PDF

References

  • Anderson, V, and Nusslein-Volhard, C. 1984. Information for the dorsal-ventral pattern of the Drosophila embryo is stored as maternal mRNA. Nature, 311, 223–227.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, S J, and Sokolowski, M B. 1984. Larval foraging behaviour in isofemale lines of Drosophila melanogaster and D. pseudoobscura. J Heredity 75, 131–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, S J, and Sokolowski, M B. 1985. A genetic analysis of path length and pupation height in a natural population of Drosophila melanogaster. Can J Genet Cytol, 27, 334–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, S J, and Sokolowski, M B. 1987. Autosomal and maternal effects on pupation behavior in Drosophila melanogaster. Behav Genet, (in press).

  • Bownes, M. 1982. Embryogenesis. In Ranson, R. (ed.) A Handbook of Drosophila Development, Elsevier Biomedical Press, New York, pp. 67–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, E H. 1976. Gene Activity in Early Development, 2nd ed. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrman, L, and Parsons, P A. 1981. Behaviour Genetics and Evolution. McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falconer, D S. 1981. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics, 2nd ed. Longman, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godoy-Herrera, R, Burnet, B, Connolly, K, and Gogarty, J. 1984. The development of locomotor activity in Drosophila melanogaster larvae. Heredity, 52, 63–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grun, P. 1976. Cytoplasmic Genetics and Evolution. Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J C. 1985. Genetic analysis of behavior in insects. In Kerkut, G. A. and Gilbert, L. I. (eds.) Comprehensive Insect Physiology Biochemistry and Pharmacology, 9, Pergamon, New York, pp. 287–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hays, W L. 1981. Statistics, 3rd ed. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manning, M, and Markow, T. 1981. Light-dependent pupation site preferences in Drosophila. II. Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans. Behav Genet, 11, 557–563.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mensua, J. 1967. Some factors affecting pupation height of Drosophila. D.I.S., 42, 76.

  • Muller, H, and Oster, I. 1963. Some mutational techniques in Drosophila. In Burdette, W. J. (ed.) Methodology in Basic Genetics, Holden-Day, San Francisco, pp. 249–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, P A. 1979. Polygenic variation in natural populations of Drosophila. In Thompson, J. N. Jr. and Thoday, J. M. (eds.) Quantitative Genetic Variation, Academic Press, New York, pp. 61–79.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sameoto, D, and Miller, R. 1968. Selection of pupation site by Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans. Ecology. 49, 177–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sas Institute Inc. 1985. SAS User's Guide: Statistics, Version 5 ed., SAS Institute, Cary. NC.

  • Sewell, D, Burnet, B, and Connolly, K. 1975. Genetic analysis of larval feeding behavior in Drosophila melanogaster. Genet Res Camb, 24, 163–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sokal, R, Ehrlich, P, Hunter, P, and Schlager, G. 1960. Some factors affecting pupation site of Drosophila. Ann Entom Soc Am, 53, 174–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sokolowski, M B. 1980. Foraging strategies of Drosophila melanogaster: A chromosomal analysis. Behav Genet, 10, 291–302.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sokolowski, M B, and Hansell, R. 1983. Elucidating the behavioral phenotype of Drosophila melanogaster larvae: Correlations between larval foraging strategies and pupation height. Behav Gent, 13, 267–280.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sokolowski, M B, Hansell, R, and Rotin, D. 1983. Drosophila larval foraging behavior: II. Selection in the sibling species Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans. Behav Genet, 13, 169–172.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sokolowski, M B, Kent, C, and Wong, J. 1984. Drosophila larval foraging behaviour: Developmental stages. Anim Behav, 32, 645–651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J N. Jr. 1975. Quantitative variation and gene number. Nature, 258, 665–668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J N. Jr, and Thoday, J M. 1976. The number of segregating genes implied by continuous variation. Genetica, 46, 335–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wahlsten, D. 1979. A critique of the concepts of heritability and heredity in behavioural genetics. In Royce, J. R. and Mos, L. (eds.) Theoretical Advances in Behavioral Genetics, Sijthoff and Nordhoff, Germantown. MD, pp. 426–481.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winer, B J. 1971. Statistical Principles in Experimental Design, 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zalokar, M, Audit, C, and Erk, I. 1975. Developmental defects of female-sterile mutants of Drosophila melanogaster. Develop Biol, 47, 419–432.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zar, J H. 1984. Biostatistical Analysis, 2nd ed. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs NJ.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biology, York University, North York, Ontario, M3J 1P3, Canada

    J Steven de Belle & Marla B Sokolowski

Authors
  1. J Steven de Belle
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Marla B Sokolowski
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

de Belle, J., Sokolowski, M. Heredity of rover/sitter: Alternative foraging strategies of Drosophila melanogaster larvae. Heredity 59, 73–83 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1987.98

Download citation

  • Received: 17 September 1986

  • Issue date: 01 August 1987

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1987.98

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

This article is cited by

  • Direct and correlated responses to artificial selection on foraging in Drosophila

    • Manuel Sevenello
    • Pedro Luna
    • Palestina Guevara-Fiore

    Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology (2023)

  • Polygene control and trait dominance in death-feigning syndrome in the red flour beetle Tribolium castaneum

    • Kentarou Matsumura
    • Takahisa Miyatake

    Behavior Genetics (2022)

  • Genetic architecture underlying morning and evening circadian phenotypes in fruit flies Drosophila melanogaster

    • K M Vaze
    • K L Nikhil
    • V K Sharma

    Heredity (2013)

  • Response of a complex foraging phenotype to artificial selection on its component traits

    • Punya Nachappa
    • David C. Margolies
    • Theodore J. Morgan

    Evolutionary Ecology (2010)

  • Which evolutionary processes influence natural genetic variation for phenotypic traits?

    • Thomas Mitchell-Olds
    • John H. Willis
    • David B. Goldstein

    Nature Reviews Genetics (2007)

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Podcasts
  • Current issue
  • Collections
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Journal Information
  • Open access publishing
  • About the Editors
  • Contact
  • About the Partner
  • For Advertisers
  • Subscribe

Publish with us

  • For Authors & Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Heredity (Heredity)

ISSN 1365-2540 (online)

ISSN 0018-067X (print)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited